THE FUNCTIONS OF HUMOROUS DISCOURSE IN MIND YOUR LANGUAGE

Muhammad Masqotul Imam Romadlani, I Dewa Putu Wijana

Abstract


The primary purpose of this study is to reveal the function of humorous discourse identified in the Mind Your Language situation comedy series. The researcher adopted a descriptive qualitative approach to complete this humor research. The data were obtained from the script of that sitcom. The function of humorous discourse found in that sitcom was then classified based on Hay's framework, which divides the function of humor into three main functions: the function of solidarity, the function of power, and the function of psychology. The findings demonstrate that teasing and satire humor in Mind Your Language sitcom are utilized to express solidarity. Meanwhile, humorous discourses that trigger conflict, harm, threaten others or show disagreement are created to express the function of power. Furthermore, humorous discourse to gain an advantage, protect oneself, entertain, or boast is used to express the function of psychology. The context of the conversation given is highly significant in identifying the function of humor. The same humorous discourse provided in different contexts potentially implicates different functions of humor which indicates that determining the function of humor is heavily grounded by the context. 


Keywords


humorous discourse; Mind Your Language; the function of humor

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asyura, M., Effendy, C., and Martono. (2014). Makna dan fungsi humor dalam kumpulan cerita Abu Nawas. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa 3(4), 1-15.

Balmores-Paulino, R. S. (2018). An exploration of the schema and function of humor. Israeli Journal for Humor Research 7(2), 43-63.

Billing, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique humor. London: SAGE Publications.

Buxman, K. (1998). Humor as a cost-effective means of stress management. Managing Employee Benefits 6(2), 74-78.

Goldman, N. (2013). Comedy and democracy: The role of humor in social justice. Animating Democracy, 1-10.

Hasan, S. (2005). India and Pakistan: Common identity and conflict. Refugee Survey Quarterly 24(4), 74-80.

Hay, J. (2000). Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 709-742.

Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.

Hurley, M. M., Dennett, D. C., and Adams Jr., R. B. (2011). Inside jokes: Using humor to reverse-engineer the mind. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Kholidah, N. N., Widodo, S. T., dan Saddhano, K. (2020). Traditional stage as a medium of social criticism: The role of humor in ludruk performance art. Journal of Critical Reviews 7 (7), 1-5.

Kuipers, G. (2009). Humor styles and symbolic boundaries. Journal of Literary Theory 3(2), 219-240.

Lewis, J. P. (2016). “Forbidden words." Torch magazine, p. 2-6.

Malphurs, R. A. (2010). People did sometimes stick things in my underwear: The function of laughter at the U. S. supreme court. Communication Law Review 10(2), 48-75.

Marmysz, J. (2003). Laughing at nothing. New York: State University of New York.

Martin, D. M., Rich, C., and Gayle, B. M. (2004). Humor works: Communication style and humor functions in manager/subordinate relationships. Southern Communication Journal 69(3), 206-222.

Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310-331.

Mir, M. A. 2014. India-Pakistan: The history of unsolved conflicts. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 19(4), 101-110.

Puri, A. D. dan Baskara, F. X. R. (2019). The function of humor applied in Margaret Cho’s stand-up comedy: PsyCHO. Journal of Language and Literature 19(1), 137-144.

Rahmanadji, D. (2007). Sejarah, teori, jenis, dan fungsi humor. BAHASA DAN SENI, 35(2), 213-221.

Rohmadi, M. (2010). “Strategi penciptaan humor dengan pemanfaatan aspek-aspek kebahasaan”. Humaniora 22, 285-298.

Ross, A. (2005). The language of humor. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis e-Library.

Sen, A. (2012). Humor analysis and qualitative research. Social Research Update, 63, 1-4.

Suaib, E., Rafli, Z., dan Muliatuti, L. (2019). Tipe dan fungsi humor dalam acara Indonesia Lawak Klub di Trans 7. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra 10(1), 123-136.

Trianda, A. (2014). “Analisis wacana humor verbal dalam film kill the messanger”, Tesis Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Linguistik, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Utami, I. I. (2018). Strategi humor pada acara stand-up comedy. Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra 2(2), 219–245.

Wangsomchok, C. (2016). A linguistic strategy to express humor in Thai. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 6(6), 462-465.

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Yaseen, Z., Jathol, I., and Muzaffar, M. (2016). Pakistan and India relations: A political analysis of conflicts and regional security in South Asia. Global Political Review 1(1), 1-9.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v16i2.11528



Copyright (c) 2021 LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Member of:

Crossref

Indexed by:

Dimension Google Scolar  Sinta Sinta   Journal TOCS     

Editorial Office:
Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Email: jurnallingua@gmail.com
Phone: +62 (0)341 570872


Creative Commons License
LiNGUA by Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/humbud/index.