THE FUNCTIONS OF ILLOCUTIONARY SPEECH ACTS USED BY TEACHERS IN THE CLASSROOM INTERACTIONS

Petra Armistany, Zamzani Zamzani

Abstract


This research aims to describe the functions of illocutionary speech acts used by teachers in learning interactions in class. The research method used in this study is qualitative descriptive. The data collection techniques in this study are observing and taking notes. The source of data in this study is teachers’ speech acts in learning interactions at State Vocational High School (SMK Negeri) 1 Klaten. The data used is the teachers’ oral speech on Mathematics, Science, History, and Accounting subjects in thelearning interactions at SMK Negeri 1 Klaten which has one conception or main idea. According to the results of the study, there are five functions of illocutionary speech acts used by the teacher in the learning interactionsin the class. The five functions include assertive functions in the form of stating and complaining; directive function in the form of commanding and advising; expressive function in the form of greeting and praising; commissive function in the form of promising and offering something; declarative function in the form of giving a name. Of the five functions, directive function is used most frequently, in which the teachers giving more commands.

Keywords


speech acts; illocution; learning interactions;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do thing with words. Oxford: Oxford Unviersity Press

Austin, J. L. (2009). Soylemek ve yapmak. R. Levent Aysever, Trans. Istanbul: Metis.

Bach, K. and Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, fourth edition. Sage Publication.

Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. Guru dan siswa dalam interaksi edukatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Emmiyati, Nuri. Illocutionary Acts In “Midnight In Paris” Movie. English and Literature Department, Faculty of Adab and Humanities: Alauddin State Islamic University of Makassar. Journal UIN Alauddin. Retrieved from http://journal.uinalauddin.ac.id/index.php/elite/article/ download/3385/3192

Grundlingh, L. (2017). Memes as speech acts. Journal of Social Semiotics Vol 28, No 2 Page 147-168. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330. 2017.1303020

Huth, Thorsten. (2011). Conversation analysis and language classroom discourse. Journal Language and Linguistisc Compass Vol 5, No 5. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1749818X.2011.00277x/full

Ifantidou, E. (2011). Genres and pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 43,.327346. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal /03782166/43/1

Lofland, John&Lyn H.Lofland. (1984). Analysing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis, Belmont. Cal: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Mahsun. 2005. Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahap Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.

Mey, Jacob L. (2004). Pragmatic an introduction. USA: Blackwell Publishing

Milleret, Margo. (2007). Teaching speech acts. Journal of the Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages. Retrieved from http://www.ncolctl.org/ files/Teaching-speech-act.pdf.

Nadar, Franciscus Xaverius. (2009). Pragmatik dan penelitian pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Parker. Frank. (1986). Linguistics for Non-Linguists. Little, Brown and Company: University of California.

Rahardi. Kunjana. (2009). Sosiopragmatik. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sari, F.D.P. (2013). Tindak Tutur dan Fungsi Tuturan Ekspresif dalam Acara Galau Nite di Metro TV: Suatu Kajian Pragmatik. Skriptorium: Journal Universitas Airlangga, 1(2), 1-14. Retrieved from http://www.journal.unair. ac.id/download-fullpapers scriptorium882d24b 95efull.pdf

Sbisa, Marina. (2002). Speech acts in context. Journal Language & Communication, 22, 421-436. Retrieved from http://www.elsevier.com/ locate/langcom.

Searle, John R. (1969). Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Penerbit CV. Alfabeta: Bandung.

Wardhaugh, Roland. (1972). Introduction to linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

Witek, Maciej. (2015). Linguistic underdeterminacy: a view from speech act theory. Journal of Pragmatics , Volume 76. Retrieved from https://philpap ers.org/rec/WITLUA

Zamzani. (2007). Kajian sosiopragmatik. Cipta Pustaka: Yogyakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v14i1.6444

Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2019 LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Member of:

Crossref

Indexed by:

Dimension Google Scolar  Sinta Sinta   Journal TOCS     

Editorial Office:
Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Email: jurnallingua@gmail.com
Phone: +62 (0)341 570872

Creative Commons License
LiNGUA by Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/humbud/index.