CONVENTIONAL INDIRECTNESS STRATEGIES ON REQUEST USED BY MALE AND FEMALE SPEAKERS IN SPOKEN BRITISH NATIONAL CORPUS

Tantri Refa Indriarti, Yulia R. Mawarni

Abstract


This study aims at analysing conventional indirectness strategies on request used by British English speakers as shown in spoken British National Corpus (BNC). Conventional indirect strategy is often rated as the most polite expression of politeness. In this case, male and female obviously have different strategies for making the request, which may be influenced by some factors. A qualitative approach was employed to conduct this study since the data are the utterances produced by male and female speakers in spoken BNC. The study revealed that there were 187 utterances that contain Conventional Indirectness Strategies on request used by male and female speakers in spoken BNC. Ability conditions was the strategy of conventional indirect request that mostly used by the male and female speakers. Then, the three factors (i.e. gender, age, and social class) have an effect and significant role on the speaker’s choice of strategies employed by British English speakers. As this study is focused on the indirect request strategies, thus it is suggested to the next researchers who are interested in the same study could be expected to conduct the indirect request strategies by adding more factors.

 


Keywords


conventional indirectness strategies; request strategies; sociolinguistics; British National Corpus

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ary, D., Lucy Cheser, Jacobs and Asghar, Razavieh.(2010). Introduction to research in education. New York: Wadiworth, Thomson Learning.

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. (1987). Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different?.Journal of pragmatics 11(2), (pp.131-146). North-Holland: Elsevier Science.

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. (1992). Themetapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society. In R. Watts, S. Ide and K. Ehlich (Eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice (pp.255-280). Berlin: Mouton.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987).Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cameron, D. (1997). Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity.In S. Johson and U.H. Meinhof (Eds.), Language and masculinity (pp.47-64). Oxford: Blackwell.

Chambers, J. K. (2002). Studying language variation: An informal epistemology. In J. K. Chambers et al. (Eds.), The handbook of language variation. Oxford: Blackwell.

Clark, L. V. (2010). What do we mean by politeness?.Academic journals research paper. https://www.academia.edu/289238/What_do_we_mean_by_Politeness

Coulmas, F. (2005).Sociolinguistics: the study of speaker’s choices. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (1980). A first dictionary of linguistics and phonetics.Great Britain: Andre Deush.

Eckert, P., McConnel-Ginnet S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Fishman, Pamela. (1978). What do couples talk about when they’re alone?.In D. Butturf and E.L.Epstein (Eds.), Women’s language and style (pp. 11-22). Akron: Ohio.

Fishman, Pamela. (1980). Conversational insecurity.In H. Giles, P. Robinson and P. Smith (Eds.), Language: social psychological perspectives (pp.127-132). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Gray, B., &Biber, D. (2011). Corpus approaches to the study of discourse. In K. Hyland and B. Paltridge (Eds.), Continuum companion to discourse analysis (pp. 138-154). New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Hickerson, N.P., (1980). Linguistic anthropology.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston

Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness.London: Longman.

Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics. In G. Leech & M. Short (Eds.) Lancaster University: Routledge.

Hunston, S. (2002).Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ishikawa, Y. (2013). Gender differences in request - A statistical analysis of American English in the NICT JLE corpus.International journal of humanities and management sciences (pp.57-62).Nagoya Institute of Technology: Japan.

Jay, T. (1992).Cursing in America: a psycholinguistics study of dirty language in the courts, in the movies, in the schoolyards, and on the streets. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Keith, G &Shuttleworth, J. (2000).Living language and literature. London United: Kingdom.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper and Row. Lancaster BNC web. http://bncweb.lancs.ac.uk

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics.London: Longman.

Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Newmeyer, F. (1988). Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey Vol. IV. Language: The socio-cultural context. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind and knowledge.University of Minnesota press.

Šeškauskaitė, L. (2014).Usage variation of politeness markers: a corpus-based study of spoken academic discourse. (Master of Arts Thesis).Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Sunarso.(1997). Variabel kelas sosial, umur, dan jenis kelamin penutur dalam penelitian sosiolinguistik. Humaniora/IV, (pp.82-85).

Trask, R. L. (2004). Key concepts in language and linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.

Trosborg, Anna. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Tsuda, S. (1993). Indirectness in Discourse: What Does It Do in Conversation?.Journal of Intercultural Communication Studies Vol. III (1), (pp.63-74).

Urbanová, L, & Oakland, A. (2002).Úvod do anglickéstylistiky. Brno: Barrister & Principal.

Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, M. M. (2015) An introduction to sociolinguistics, Seventh Edition. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Watts, R. (2003). Politeness: Key topics in sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/prdg.v2i1.6711

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 

Editorial Office

English Letters Department

Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Phone (+62) 341 551354, Facsimile (+62) 341 572533
e-mail: paradigm@uin-malang.ac.id