Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa SMA pada Topik Usaha dan Energi

Devi Ayu Nur'aini, Parlindungan Sinaga

Abstract


Argumentation skills related to critical thinking skills that are important for 21st century students. This study aims to identify differences argumentation skills based on gender of senior high school students in Tangerang Regency. This research method is quantitative descriptive utilizing a sample of 110 high school students consisting of 44 male students and 66 female students. The sample was utilized purposive sampling technique. The research instrument consisted of 8 essay items on the topic Works and Energy with a reliability coefficient α=0,778. The argumentation components that were measured are claims, warrant, backing, and rebuttal. The results of this study showed that 19% answers of students were only claims, 81% answers of students were warrant and backing, and 11% answers of students were rebuttal. The results of the Mann Whitney test were no differences the argumentation skill among male and female students. However, male students have a slightly higher skill to make either weak rebuttal or identifiable rebuttal.


Keywords


Argumentation Skills; Work and Energy; Gender

Full Text:

PDF

References


Davies, M., & Barnett, R. (2015). The palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education. In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057

Demirbag, M., & Gunel, M. (2014). Integrating Argument-Based Science Inquiry with Modal Representations: Impact on Science Achievement, Argumentation, and Writing Skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 386–391. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.1632

Eemeren, F. H. Van, & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge University Press.

Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., Bakar, A., & Harizon. (2020). Skills to argue: Using argument-based learning (AbL) and socio-scientific issues to promote university students’ argumentation skills in chemistry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022042

Ekanara, B., & Isfiani, I. R. (2020). High School Students’ Argumentation Skills: A Study of Sundanese High School Students’ Opinion-forming Skills about Human Cloning Issues. Scientiae Educatia, 9(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v9i2.7327

Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012

Faiqoh, N., Khasanah, N., Astuti, L. P., Prayitno, R., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Profil Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Kelas X dan XI MIPA di SMA Batik 1 Surakarta pada Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(3), 174. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v7i3.10122

Foong, C. C., & Daniel, E. G. S. (2013). Students’ Argumentation Skills across Two Socio-Scientific Issues in a Confucian Classroom: Is transfer possible? International Journal of Science Education, 35(14), 2331–2355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.697209

Fung, D. C.-L., & Liang, T. W. (2018). Fostering Critical Thinking Through Collaborative Group Work. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2411-6

Hasnunidah, N., & Wiono, W. J. (2019). Argument-Driven Inquiry, Gender, and Its Effects on Argumentation Skills. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 4(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v4i2.4676

Herlanti, Y. (2014). Analisis argumentasi mahasiswa pendidikan biologi pada isu sosiosainfik konsumsi genetically modified organism (GMO). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v3i1.2901

Higgins, S. (2014). Critical thinking for 21st-century education: A cyber-tooth curriculum? Prospects, 44(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9323-0

Hsu, P. S., Dyke, M. Van, Lee, E. M., & Smith, T. J. (2017). The effect of varied gender groupings on science knowledge and argumentation skills among middle level students. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL, 2(2), 781–782. http://scholarworks.uvm.edu/mgreview/vol3/iss2/4

Khaira, N. (2018). Pengaruh Pembelajaran STEM Terhadap Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran IPA. Seminar Nasional MIPA IV, 233–237.

Lestari, A. B., & Djukri. (2019). The problem-solving skills of senior high school students on biology in temanggung. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012019

Lin, Y. (2018). Developing Critical Thinking in EFL Classes. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7784-5

Rahman, D. F. (2018). Analisis Argumentasi dalam Isu Sosiosaintifik Siswa SMP. Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 01(01), 9–13.

Songsil, W., Pongsophon, P., Boonsoong, B., & Clarke, A. (2019). Developing scientific argumentation strategies using revised argument-driven inquiry (rADI) in science classrooms in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0035-x

Sukardi, R. R., & Agustrianti, Y. V. (2017). Analysis of Students’ Argumentation Skill and Conceptual Knowledge in Friction Force Lesson through Argumentative Task. International Conference of Mathematics and Science Education, 57, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.2991/icmsed-16.2017.18

Sulaiman, D., Kusairi, S., & Latifah, E. (2019). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Dan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Sma Negeri 1 Tarakan Dinamika Gerak Rotasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 7(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.7.1.2019.55-63

Suminar, I., Muslim, & Liliawati, W. (2017). Integrated argument-based inquiry with multiple representation approach to promote scientific argumentation skill. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983958

Tiruneh, D. T., De Cock, M., Weldeslassie, A. G., Elen, J., & Janssen, R. (2017). Measuring Critical Thinking in Physics: Development and Validation of a Critical Thinking Test in Electricity and Magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 663–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9723-0

Wang, J. (2020). Scrutinising the positions of students and teacher engaged in argumentation in a high school physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 42(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1700315

Wardani, A. D., Yuliati, L., & Taufiq, A. (2016). Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah dan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika SMA pada Materi Gaya dan Gerak. In Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM (pp. 13–16).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/experiment.v5i1.32690

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Experiment: Journal of Science Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

INDEXED & SUPPORTED BY:

                       

EDITORIAL OFFICE
Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan 
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang 65144, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Telp/Fax: +62341-552398    
Email: experiment@uin-malang.ac.id / Website: http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/experiment