THE DESIGN ARGUMENT FOR GOD’S EXISTENCE: Ayatullâh Ja’far Subḥânî’s Criticism of David Hume’s Thoughts

Mukhammad Zamzami, Ghorbanali Karimzadeh Gharamaleki, Abdullah Hosseinieskandian, Fikri Mahzumi

Abstract


The design argument is one of the strongest arguments to prove God's existence. It has been analyzed by various thinkers throughout the history in defense of God’s existence. However, some empiricist philosophers who do not believe in God’s existence criticized and questioned this argument. David Hume (1711-1776) is one of those who made a tremendous effort to deny God’s existence. He also criticized the design argument. Hume’s critiques have always been challenged by philosophers and God-believing theologians. This article is made to criticize Hume’s critiques on the design argument from Ayatullâh Subḥânî’s perspective using descriptive-analytical method. Hume’s objection was due to misunderstanding of the argument’s purpose and function. It should be acknowledged that this argument can easily prove God’s essence along with other arguments such as ḥudûth, necessity, and possibility. The design argument pushes us to the supernatural limits. Also, this argument is supported by experimental sciences because every new discovery made in natural sciences provides us with a new sign to prove God.

Keywords


The Existence of God; The Design Argument; Ja‘far Subhani; David Hume; Atheism; Theism.

Full Text:

PDF

References


‘Abduh, M. 1987. Nahj al-Balâghah li al-Imâm ’Ali ibn Abî T{âlib. Mu’assasat al-Nashr al-Islâmî.

Amoli, A. J. 1985. Explanation of the Arguments of Proof of God. Isra.

Arshadnejad, S. 2016, June 15. A Critique of Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Research Gate. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 13140/RG.2.1.4890.9683.

Boudry, M., & Leuridan, B. 2011. Where the Design Argument Goes Wrong: Auxiliary Assumptions and Unification. Philosophy of Science, 78(4): 558-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/661753.

De Dijn, H. 2012. Spinoza and Hume on Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. Hume Studies, 38(1): 3-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2012.0008.

Faghfoory, M. H. 2003. Doctrines of Shi’i Islam: A Compendium of Ima mi Beliefs and Practices Ayatullâh Ja'far Subh{ânî. in Reza Shah Kazemi (Eds.) (London and New York: l B. Tauris Publishers and the Institute of Isma’ili Studies, 2001. 240 pages). American Journal of Islam and Society, 20(2): 119-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v20i2.1861

Golpaygani, A. R. 2004. Argumentative Opinions. Sanabôl Publications.

Grave, S. A. 1976. Hume’s Criticism of the Argument from Design. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 30 (115/116 (1/2): 64-78.

Hick, J. 1993. Philosophy of Religion (Trans. B. Rad). al-Hadi Publications.

Lingier, H. 2021. Hume’s Dialogues: A Natural Explanation of Natural Religion? International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 82(3): 233-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2021.2014938.

Maftukhin, M., & Khamami, A. 2018. Metode dan Pendekatan Pembuktian Wujud Tuhan: Studi Pemikiran Muhammad Iqbal dan Bediuzzaman Said Nursi. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam, 19(2): 290-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v19i2.5418.

al-Majlisî, M. B. 2008. Bih}âr al-Anwâr (First Edition). al-Tûrâth al-‘Arabî.

Malekian, M. 1993. New Theology Lessons (First Edition). Imam Sadiq Institute.

Motahhari, M. 1978. The Reasons of Tendency towards Materialism (Eighth Edition). Sadra.

Motahhari, M. 1985. Wisdom (Ninth Edition). Sadra.

Motahhari, M. 2008. Collection of Works (Ninth Edition). Sadra.

Musivand, M. 2014. Reflection on the Design Argument. Ma'rifat Falsafi. Nidham Burhan Dar Taammuli- Musayundi Muhsin- falsafi Ma'rifat (nashriyat.ir)

Popkin, R. H., & Stroll, A. 1993. Philosophy Made Simple (2nd rev. ed). Doubleday.

Purrusta, J. 2010. The Argument from Design According to the Contemporary Islamic Thinkers. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 11(43-44): 51-74.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22091/pfk.2010.153.

Saemi & Razavi H. 2019. Hume’s Objection to the Design Argument Based on the Existence of Evil and Skeptical Theism. Journal for Philosophy of Religion 18(1).

DOI: https://civilica.com/doc/1126113.

Sober, E. 2018. The Design Argument (Elements in the Philosophy of Religion). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108558068.

Subh{ânî, J. 1983. Allah Khâliq al-Kawn. Seyyed al-Shûhâda Institute.

Subhânî, J. 1989. Mas}dar al-Wujûd bayn al-‘Ilm wa al-Falsafa (First Editiom). Imam Sadiq Institute.

Subhânî, J. 1990. Questions and Answers. Seyyed al-Shûhâda Institute.

Subhânî, J. 1991. Al-Ilâhiyyât (Fourth Edition). Seyyed al-Shûhâda Institute.

Subhânî, J. 1992. God’s Path. Imam Sadiq Institute.

Subhânî, J. 1999. Islamic Philosophy and Dialectics Principles. Imam Sadiq Institute.

Subhânî, J. 2003. Introduction to New Issues in Theology (Second Edition). Imam Sadiq Institute.

Subhânî, J. 2005. Muh}âdarât fî Ilâhiyyât (S. Behbahani, Penerj.). Bostan-e Kitab.

Subhânî, J. 2008. Knowing the Principles of Islam (Third Edition). Imam Sadiq Institute.

al-Tabatabâî, M. H. 2003. Nihâyat al-H{ikmah. al-Nashâr al-Islâmî Institute.

Tarrant, J. 2018. Hume's Belief in God. Philosophy, 93(1): 91-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819117000419.

Temple, D. 1992. Hume’s Logical Objection to the Argument from Design Based on the Uniqueness of the Universe. Religious Studies, 28(1): 19-30.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v24i1.20698

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Tools:

image host  image hostimage host image host

Indexed By:

image host image host image hostimage hostimage hostimage hostimage host image host

All publication by Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam, P-ISSN : 1858-4349, E-ISSN : 2442-5249