THE REACTUALIZATION OF ‘IṢMAH AL-A’IMMAH CONCEPT: Analysis on the Interpretation of al- Ṭabatabâ’î

Suraya Attamimi, Nurhayati Nurhayati

Abstract


‘Imah al-a’immah issue has been a polemic among the theology community of Sunni-Shia, particularly in the internal Shia. The Shia Ismâ’ilîyah and Ithnâ ‘Asyarîyah communities believe in the absolute ma’ûm character of their leaders/imam. Meanwhile, some Shia Zaidîyah communities limit the character, and the rest totally refuses it. Al-abatabâ’î, a Shia Ithnâ Asyarîyah ulama known to be moderate and is accepted in Sunni community, has similar opinion with his mazhab’s doctrine regarding ‘imah al-a’immah. However, al- abatabâ’î tried not to dwell on a never-ending ‘imah issue, but interpreted it contextually instead. This article reveals the ‘imah al-a’immah concept of al-abatabâ’î by applying qualitative research and analytic descriptive method. According to al- abatabâ’î, an imam/leader must be ma’ûm before guiding people toward devotion. The ma’ûm level is achieved through knowledge, irâdah and ikhtiyar of imam in obeying Allah and staying away from immorality. Their obedience makes Allah grant them with a well-absorbed special insight (‘ilm uûrî) to form a character that later becomes a self-controller from sinful acts, with which they eventually achieve the ma’ûm level. Al-abatabâ’î then tried to escape from further theological debate by interpreting ‘imah as a potential which is achievable by ordinary people to protect human values.


Keywords


al-Ṭabatabâ’î, ‘Iṣmah al-A’immah, reactualization

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, A. Z. 2014. Akidah Imāmah Shīah dalam Konteks Doktrin Wilāyah al-Faqīh Khomeini: Suatu Analisis Simbiotik. Afkar-Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam, 37-66. Edisi Khas dan Kerjasama UM USM

al-Awsî, ‘Alî. 1985. Al-al- Ṭabatabâ’î Manhajuh fi Tafsîrih al-Mîzân. Teheran: al-Jumhûriyah al-Islâmiyah.

Attamimi, S. 2015. Tradisi Keberagamaan Syiah Fatimiyah di Kota Palu. Istiqra, 3(1): 102-135. DOI: https://jurnal.iainpalu.ac.id/index.php/ist/article/view/211.

Attamimi, S., Aswadi, A., & Syafaq, H. 2022. Telaah Tematik Esensi Makna ‘Ismah dalam al-Qur’an. al Quds: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan Hadis, 6(2): 447-470.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i2.3861.

Aziz, A. 2020. Imamah dalam Pemikiran Politik Syi’ah. Humanistika: Jurnal Keislaman, 6(2): 124-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36835/humanistika.v6i2.367.

Darajat, Z. 1983. Islam dan Kesehatan Mental. Jakarta: Gunung Agung.

Habib, Z. 2018. Epistimology of Ḥudûrî in Suhrawardi al-Maqtûl’s Ḥikmat Ishraqiyyah. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam, 19(2):209-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v19i2.5507.

Hillî. 1413. Kasyf al-Murâd. Qom: Muassasah Nasyre Islami.

Khairudin, F. 2016. Makna Imam Menurut al-Thabataba’i dalam Kitab al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an. Jurnal Syahadah, 5(01): 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32520/syhd.v5i1.

Khoshraftar, A., & Ehteshaminia, M. 2016. The Ismahof Prophets and Shiiate Imams and Its Effects on the Understanding of Verses and Religious Hadiths from Qutbal-din Ravandi’s Perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS), 1(1): 1594-1606.

Kurniawan, M. I. 2020. Analisis Kritis Gerakan Syiah Zaidiyah dan Rafidhah. Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 4(2): 119-144. DOI: http://doi.org/10.21111/tasfiyah.v4i2.4196

al-Mawardi. t.th. Al-Ahkâm al-Sult{âniyah. Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr.

Mas’od, M. A., & Hamat, M. F. 2019. Pemikiran Skeptikal Syiah Terhadap Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jama‘ah dalam Karya-Karya Syiah Melayu: Satu Kritikan. Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam, 21(1): 1-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol21no1.1.

al-Muzaffar, M. R. 2000. Al-Shî’ah wa al-Imâmah. Teheran: Maktabah Niyni al-Hadîthah.

Marjuni, K. N. n.d.. Konseptualisasi Doktrin Kemaksuman Imam Aliran-Aliran Syiah (Zaidiyah, Imamiyah, Ismailiyah). Malaysia: USIM Associate Professor of Islamic Philosphi Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia.

Marjuni, K. N. 2020. Konsep Kepemimpinan dalam Perspektif Teologi Syiah. Transformasi: Jurnal Kepemimpinan & Pendidikan Islam, 3(2): 42-51. DOI: http://doi.org/10.47945/transformasi.v3i2.337.

Marjuni, K. N., & Wardi, F. 2017. Al-Nizâ’ al-Siyâsî bayn al-Firaq al-Shî’iyyah. ‘Abqari Journal, 11(1): 181-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/abqari.vol11no1.118.

Mooezi, A. 2021. The Shi’is and the Qur’an: Between Apocalypse, Civil Wars, and Empire. Religions, 13(1): 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13010001.

Musbikin, I. 2016. Istantiq al-Qur’an; Pengenalan Studi al-Qur’an Pendekatan Interdisipliner. Yogyakarta: Jaya Star Nine.

Mut}ahhari, M. 1995. Falsafah Akhlaq. Bandung: Pustaka Hidayah.

Nafiuddin, N., & Bahri, S. 2022. Kemaksuman Imam Perspektif Syiah Imamiyah. Waratsah: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Dan Sosiolinguistik, 8(2): 21-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21202/waratsah.v8i2.48

Otta, Y. A. 2018. Dimensi-dimensi Mistik Tafsir al-Mizan (Studi atas Pemikiran Thabathaba’i dalam Tafsir Al-Mizan). Potret Pemikiran, 19(2): 77-105 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30984/pp.v19i2.733

Rajani, K. 2021. Between Qum and Qayrawān: Unearthing early Shii ḥadı̄ th sources. Bulletin of SOAS, 84(3): 419–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X2100077X

Razaki, A. Q. n.d.. Pengantar Kepada Tafsir Al-Mizan. Al-Hikmah.

Rijal, T. S., & Palangkey, R. D. (n.d.). Metamorposis Syi’ah: Antara Politik, Mazhab, Teologi dan Konsep Negara Teokrasi. Uniqbu Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2): 148-159 DOI:https://doi.org/10.47323/ujss.v2i2.146

Rusli, R. 2009. Kontroversi Akhbarî dan Uṣûlî dalam Pemikiran Syiah Imamiyah. Ulumuna; Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 8(1): 141-169.

al-Salûs, A. A. 2001. Ensiklopedi Sunnah dan Syiah; Studi Perbandingan Akidah dan Tafsir (Pnj. Bisri Abdusshomad dkk). Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar.

Shihab, M. Q. 2007. 'Ilm" In Ensiklopedia Al-Qur’an: Kajian Kosakata: Vol. 3. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.

Syafi’i, I. 2019. Imamah dalam Pemikiran Politik Syi’ah. Asy-Syari’ah : Jurnal Hukum Islam, 5(1): 35-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36835/assyariah.v5i1.112.

Syarifah, Umaiyatus & Fahimah, Siti. 2020. Zaghlûl Râghib Muhammad al-Najjâr’s Methods and Principles of Scientific Exegesis: A Review of Tafsîr al-Âyât al-Kawniyyah fî al-Qur’ân al-Karîm. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam, 21(2): 289-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v21i2.10227.

al-Syahrastani. 1993. Al-Milal wa al-Nihal. Beirut: Dâr al-Ma'rifah.

al- Ṭabatabâ’î, Muhammad. Husayn. 1989. Islamic Teachings: An Overview, Inilah Islam: Upaya Memahami Seluruh Konsep Islam Secara Mudah (Pnj. A. Muhammad). Jakarta: Pustaka Hidayah.

al- Ṭabatabâ’î, M. H. 1995. Bidâyat al-Ḥikmah. Qom: Muassasah al-Ma’ârif al-Islâmiyyah.

al- Ṭabatabâ’î, M. H. 1997. al- Mîzân fî Tafsîr al- Qur’ân (Vol. 1, 5, 11 & 16). Beirut: Muassasah al-A’lamî li al-Mat{bû’ât.

al- Ṭabatabâ’î, M. H. 2002. Al-‘Aqâ’id al-Islâmiyah. Beirut: Muassasah A’lamî li al-Mat{bû’ât.

al-Ṭabatabâ’î, M. H. 2006. Tafsîr al-Bayân fî al-Muwâfaqat bayna al- Ḥadîth wa al-Qur’ân. Beirut: Dâr al-Ta’âruf li al-Mat{bû’ât.

Tamrin, T. T. 2019. Tafsir al-Mizan: Karakteristik dan Corak Tafsir. Al-Munir: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 1(1): 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24239/al-munir.v1i1.21

Tim Riset Majelis Tinggi Urusan Islam Mesir. 2015. Ensiklopedi Aliran dan Mazhab di Dunia Islam. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar.

Umar, N. 2021. Menyelami Seluk Beluk Makrifat. Jakarta: Grasindo.

al Walid, K. 2020. Husuli and Huduri un The Wisdom Philosophy of Muta’aliyyah Context. Jurnal Yaqzhan, 6(2): 163-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24235/jy.v6i2.7117.

Yunus, M. 2020. Pemikiran Politik Imam al-Mawardi tentang Penganggkatan Imam (Khalifah). Humanistika: Jurnal Keislaman, 6(2): 191–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55210/humanistika.v6i2.368.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v24i1.20750

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Tools:

image host image host image host image host

Indexed By:

image host image host image hostimage hostimage hostimage hostimage host image host

All publication by Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam, P-ISSN : 1858-4349, E-ISSN : 2442-5249