Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

J-MPI (Jurnal Managemen Pendidikan Islam) focuses on the publication of scientific research result related to : 

  1. Islamic Education Management 
  2. Islamic Education Leadership
  3. Islamic School Management
  4. School Supervision and
  5.  Education management covering textual investigation and field investigation with the perspective of education, philosophy, history, theology, sociology, anthroplogy, political science related to Islamic Education Management etc. 

 

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

  1. Every article sent by author to J-MPI (Jurnal manajemen Pendidikan Islam) will be checked by editor for early screening. 
  2. Manuscript which are not suitable with the journal criteria based on the screening by editor will be rejected.
  3. Manuscript which are suitable with the criteria of the journal will be sent to two reviewers with the method of double-blind.
  4. Then, Editor makes decision based on the recommendation from reviewer with these possibilities : rejected, need revision or accepted. Editor has the right to decide article which will be published. 
  5. Editor informs the decision to author. 

 

Publication Frequency

J-MPI (Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam) mempunyai frekuensi terbit 2 kali dalam setahun, yaitu pada bulan Juni dan Desember.

 

Open Access Policy

this journal is an open access journal which provides immediate, worldwide, barrier-free access to the full text of all published article without change readers or their institutions for access. readers have right to read, download, copy, distributes, print, search or link to the full texts of all article in Journal Managemen Pendidikan Islam.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. 

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Hasil gambar untuk committee on publication ethics logo

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Screening for Plagiarism

J-MPI (Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam) sangat menentang plagiarisme. J-MPI berkomitmen untuk memblokir plagiarisme, termasuk self-plagiarisme.

Penulis harus memastikan bahwa mereka telah menulis karya asli sepenuhnya, dan jika penulis telah menggunakan karya dan / atau kata-kata orang lain yang telah dikutip atau dikutip dengan tepat. Makalah yang ditemukan dengan masalah seperti itu secara otomatis ditolak dan penulis sangat menyarankan. Juga, bagian penting dari pekerjaan belum dipublikasikan. Penulis juga menghormati penulisan dalam Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam dari publikasi, duplikat, atau penipuan yang berlebihan.

Sebelum penulis mengajukan naskah ke Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam setidaknya untuk terlebih dahulu memeriksa penggunaan plagiarisme. Ketika mengirimkan artikel yang diterbitkan untuk pemeriksaan keaslian,Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam merekomendasikan penggunaan Turnitin, Scanner dari http://turnitin.com/. Sebelum menggunakan Plagiarisme Turnitin untuk pertama kalinya, kami sangat menyarankan agar penulis membaca petunjuk untuk menggunakan pendeteksi plagiarisme ini. Sistem plagiarisme detektor untuk Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam menggunakan dan berafiliasi dengan Turnitin.

Harap dicatat bahwa Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam berafiliasi dengan Turnitin.

Artikel belum pernah dipublikasikan di media lain dan tidak mengandung plagiarisme. Sebaiknya penulis harus menggunakan perangkat lunak manajemen referensi, misalnya untuk Mendeley atau Zotero. Bibliografi dan sistem referensi untuk Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam menggunakan Mendeley dan Zotero

 

Review Guidelines

Umum

  1. Berikan tanda pada bagian atau bagian yang salah yang perlu diubah
  2. Berikan tanda di sisi kanan garis atau garis yang salah yang perlu diubah

Detail

  1. Judul: Efektivitas, Spesifikasi, dan kejelasan
  2. Abstrak: Menyelesaikan dan mendeskripsikan esensi artikel
  3. Kata kunci: Menggambarkan konsep penting dari artikel
  4. Pendahuluan: Up-to-date, orisinalitas, relevansi Topik, kompatibilitas alasan penting dari objek penelitian
  5. Metode Penelitian: Harus menekankan pada prosedur dan analisis data untuk studi empiris
  6. Hasil dan Pembahasan: Temuan terbaru, relevansi dengan para peneliti yang saling terkait, dan kontribusi kontribusi ilmiah dari temuan/ide untuk pengembangan praktik dan keilmuan.
  7. Kesimpulan: Logis, valid, singkat, dan jelas
  8. Saran: Untuk tindakan praktis, pengembangan teori baru, dan penelitian selanjutnya / lanjutan
  9. Gambar / Tabel: Pusat terletak, Tidak dipotong, Kualitas bagus untuk dilihat, Gambar / judul tabel, Direferensikan dengan huruf kapital
  10. Daftar Pustaka: Derajat terbaru dan referensi ke sumber buku utama. Aturan: minimum 80% dari jurnal atau peneliti ilmiah yang saling terkait, di atas 2007 (tahun); jumlah sumber buku minimum 10; minimum 80% dalam teks / bahan seni.

Proses Peninjauan Lengkap Manuskrip

  1. Menulis: Apakah naskah mudah diikuti, yaitu, memiliki perkembangan logis dan organisasi yang jelas?
  2. Apakah naskahnya ringkas dan mudah dipahami? Setiap bagian yang harus dikurangi,
  3. Dihilangkan / diperluas / ditambahkan?
  4. Perhatikan jika ada masalah besar dengan mekanika: tata bahasa, tanda baca, ejaan. (Jika hanya ada beberapa tempat yang tidak terucap dengan baik atau benar, buat catatan untuk memberi tahu penulis tempat-tempat tertentu. Jika ada masalah yang konsisten di seluruh, hanya pilih satu atau dua contoh jika perlu - jangan mencoba dan edit semuanya).
  5. Singkatan: Dipakai dengan bijaksana dan disusun sedemikian rupa sehingga pembaca tidak akan kesulitan mengingat apa yang diwakilkan oleh singkatan.
  6. Mengikuti gaya, format dan aturan jurnal lainnya.
  7. Kutipan disediakan saat memberikan informasi berbasis bukti dari sumber luar.

Keputusan Kategori

  • Publikasikan: Tidak Perlu Revisi
  • Minor: Revisi dapat dilakukan oleh Editor-In-Chief atau mereka yang membantu
  • Mayor: Revisi hanya dapat dilakukan oleh penulis
  • Ditolak: Tidak ilmiah atau terlalu banyak