The Implementation of Omnibus Law in Indonesia Law Making Process on Philosophy Review

Putu Eva Ditayani Antari

Abstract


The omnibus law is a method of law-making in Indonesia that began to be applied when the creation of the Job Creation Act was established. The adaptation of this method is controversial because in addition to aiming to simplify Indonesian regulations, it also violates the provisions of the formation of laws regulated in the law. The implementation of this omnibus law is the focus of research studies that lead to discourses based on schools of legal philosophy, especially the Positivism and Legal Realism schools which lead to contradictory conclusions. In order to answer this question, a juridical literature research will be carried out based on an understanding of the various schools of law based on philosophy, using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The results of the study conclude that legal positivism requires omnibus law to be stipulated in law as a method of law formation before it is implemented, so that it can provide legitimacy to its position in Indonesian legislation. Meanwhile, legal realism views that the presence of omnibus law is the will of the community and must be responded to in a responsive manner to overcome the excess regulations that occur in Indonesia and tend to overlap.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad Ulil Aedi, Sakti Lazuardi, Ditta Chandra Putri. “ARSITEKTUR PENERAPAN OMNIBUS LAW MELALUI TRANSPLANTASI HUKUM NASIONAL PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG (Architecture of the Application of Omnibus Law Through National Legal Transplantation Formation of Law).” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 14, no. 1 (2020): 1–18.

Ali, Achmad. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group, 2009.

Anggono, Bayu Dwi. “Omnibus Law Sebagai Teknik Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Peluang Adopsi Dan Tantangannya Dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 9, no. 1 (2020): 17. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i1.389.

Ansari, Muhammad Insa. “Omnibus Law Untuk Menata Regulasi Penanaman Modal.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 9, no. 1 (2020): 71. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i1.378.

Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani. “Implementasi Fugsi Pengawasan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Dalam Upaya Memperkuat Sistem Presidensial Di Indonesia.” Refleksi Hukum 4, no. 2 (2020): 247. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v4i2.17065.

Ardiansyah, Mohammad Kamil. “PEMBARUAN HUKUM OLEH MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MENGISI KEKOSONGAN HUKUM ACARA PERDATA DI INDONESIA (Legal Reform by The Supreme Court of Indonesia Facing the Legal Vacuum in Civil Procedure Law).” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 14, no. 2 (2020): 361–84.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. “Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia.” Jimly.com, 2011. http://jimly.com/makalah/namafile/57/ Konsep_Negara_Hukum_Indonesia.pdf.

———. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Atmadja, I Dewa Gede. Hukum Konstitusi Problematika Konstitusi Indonesia Sesudah Perubahan UUD 1945. Malang: Setara Press, 2010.

Austin, John. “John Austin’s Province of Jurisprudence.Pdf.” London: John Murray, 1832.

Budiono, Arief, and Wafda Vivid Izziyana. “THEISTIC LEGAL REALISM (Suatu Pilihan Radikal Bagi Pengembangan Hukum).” In Hukum Rasendental Pengembangan Dan Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 367–83, 2018.

Busroh, Firman Freaddy. “Konseptualisasi Omnibus Law Dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Regulasi Pertanahan.” Arena Hukum 10, no. 2 (2017): 227–50. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2017.01002.4.

Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif Dan Empiris). Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2016.

F Kurniawan. “Problematika Pembentukan RUU Cipta Kerja Dengan Konsep Omnibus Law Pada Klaster Ketenagakerjaan Pasal 89 Angka 45 Tentang Pemberian Pesangon Kepada Pekerja Yang Di PHK.” Jurnal Panorama Hukum 5, no. 1 (2020): 64.

Gahar, Affan. Politik Indonesia: Transisi Menuju Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.

Hart, H.L.A. The Concept of Law. Second Edi. New York: Oxford University Press Inc., 1961. https://doi.org/10.1201/b22212-8.

Hermanto, A B. “Ajaran Positivisme Hukum Di Indonesia: Kritik Dan Alternatif Solusinya.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis (Selisik) 2, no. 4 (2016): 108–21. http://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/selisik/article/view/650.

Hukum Online. “Menelusuri Asal-Usul Konsep Omnibus Law.” hukumonline.com, 2020. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5e2c1e4de971a/menelusuri-asal-usul-konsep-omnibus-law.

Irawan Febriansyah, Ferry. “Konsep Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Perspektif 21, no. 3 (2016): 220–29. http://jurnal-perspektif.org/index.php/perspektif/article/view/586.

Izzaty, Risdiana. “URGENSI KETENTUAN CARRY-OVER DALAM PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG DI INDONESIA ( The Urgency of Carry-Over Provision in Law-Making in Indonesia ).” Jurnal HAM 11, no. 1 (2020): 85–98.

Kristiyanto, Eko Noer. “Urgensi Omnibus Law Dalam Percepatan Reformasi Regulasi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 2 (2020): 233–44. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.233-244.

Kunjana, Gora. “11 Klaster Omnbus Law Ciptaker.” Investor Daily, 2020. https://investor.id/business/11-klaster-omnbus-law-ciptaker.

Nadir, and Win Yuli Wardani. “PERCIKAN PEMIKIRAN TIGA ALIRAN HUKUM: SEJARAH HUKUM, SOCIOLOGICAL JURISPRUDENCE, DAN LEGAL REALISME DALAM KHASANAH HUKUM INDONESIA.” Yustisia 20, no. 1 (2019): 41–51.

Nurbaningsih, Enny. “Hirarkhi Baru Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.Pdf.” Mimbar Hukum X, no. 48 (2004): 24–37.

Nurita, Dewi. “UU Terdampak Omnibus Law Cipta Lapangan Kerja Bertambah Jadi 81.” Tempo.Co, 2020. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1299382/uu-terdampak-omnibus-law-cipta-lapangan-kerja-bertambah-jadi-81/full&view=ok.

Prabowo, Adhi Setyo, Andhika Nugraha Triputra, and Yoyok Junaidi. “Politik Hukum Omnibus Law Di Indonesia.” Pamator Journal 13, no. 1 (2020): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v13i1.6923.

Prasetyo, Teguh, and Abdul Hakim Barkatullah. Ilmu Hukum Dan Filsafat Hukum. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2007.

Putra, Antoni. “Penerapan Omnibus Law Dalam Upaya Reformasi Regulasi.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 17, no. 12 (2020): 1–10.

Ramadhan, Gilang. “OMNIBUS LAW SEBAGAI SARANA UTAMA PENATAAN REGULASI.” Yurispruden 3, no. 2 (2020): 172–85.

Ratnapala, Suri. Jurisprudence. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Soeprapto, Maria Farida Indrati. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan (Proses Dan Teknik Pembentukannya). Jakarta: Kanisius, 2020.

———. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan 1 : Jenis, Fungsi Dan Materi Muatan. Edisi Revi. Yogyakarta: PT. Kanisius, 2020.

Sudiyana, Sudiyana, and Suswoto Suswoto. “Kajian Kritis Terhadap Teori Positivisme Hukum Dalam Mencari Keadilan Substantif.” Qistie 11, no. 1 (2018): 107–36. https://doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v11i1.2225.

Sunarto. “Prinsip Checks and Balances Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 45, no. 2 (2016): 157. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.2.2016.157-163.

Syamsuddi, Aziz. Proses Dan Teknik Penyusunan Undang-Undang. Cetakan Pe. Jakarta: PT. Sinar Grafika, 2011.

Tamanaha, Brian Z. A Realistic Theory of Law. A Realistic Theory of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979778.

Wibowo, Mardian. “Problem Penemuan Kebenaran Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi The Problems of Truth Discovery in Constitutional Court Decision.” Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 1 (2016): 145–70.

Yusnani, Hasyimzoem, M. Iwan Satriawan, Ade Arif Firmansyah, and Siti Khoiriyah. Hukum Pemerintahan Daerah. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2017.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v14i1.15757

Copyright (c) 2022 Putu Eva Ditayani Antari

Published By:

Shariah Faculty Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia

 


De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar'iah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International