THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SITIHINGGIL OF THE PALACES IN CIREBON WITH MAJAPAHIT ARCHITECTURE BASED ON SHAPE AND SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION

Rahadhian Prajudi Herwindo

Abstract


There is an important old element in Kasepuhan and Kanoman Palaces called Sitihinggil. The Sitihinggil complex refers to Majapahit relics located deep in East Java. This research aims to recognize Majapahit architectural patterns in Sitihinggil Keraton in Cirebon, so it is expected that architectural relationships from the Pre-Islamic-Majapahit to the Islamic period will be identified, especially in residential buildings. The research method is carried out through a typological comparison between relics of Majapahit buildings and Sitihinggil in their architectural transformation. The study has been conducted by examining the shape transformation and the spatial pattern of the mass-spatial arrangement, figure, and ornamentation through the real form of reconstruction results and the relief picture of the Majapahit temple. This study shows a strong architectural relationship between the Sitihinggil in Kasepuhan and the architectural patterns of Majapahit era. At the same time, the Kanoman palace has changed more dynamically. Both show an architectural transformation, but Majapahit traces can still be recognized by persistent patterns such as mass patterns, figures, ornaments, and gates. This phenomenon illustrates the spirit of preservation of the past, even though the religious orientation has changed.


Keywords


Sitihinggil; Kasepuhan; Kanoman; Majapahit; Transformation

Full Text:

PDF

References


R. P. Herwindo, M. Sutrisno, Virtual Rekonstruksi Dalem Agung Pakungwati Keraton Kasepuhan di Cirebon, Laporan Penelitian Balai Arkeologi Jawa Barat, 2019.

T. Roesmanto, “A Study of Traditional House of Northern Central Java - A Case Study of Demak and Jepara”, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 219-226, 2002, doi: 10.3130/ jaabe.1.2_219.

Lasmiyati, “Keraton Kanoman di Cirebon (Sejarah dan Perkembangannya)”, Jurnal Patanjala, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 131-147, Maret 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.30959/ patanjala.v5i1.184.

Rully, “Perwujudan Simbolisme Sitihinggil Utara Keraton Kasunanan Surakarta Hadiningrat (Analisis pada Aspek Arsitektur Secara Makro)”, Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Arsitektur, Vol. 11, No. 15, 2012.

I. Adrisijanti, Arkeologi Perkotaan Mataram Islam, Yogyakarta: Jendela, 2000.

R. P. Herwindo, Representasi Candi dalam DInamika Arsitektur di Indonesia, Disertasi Doktor, Unpar, Bandung, 2011.

T. P. Galestin, Houtbouw Op Oost-Javaansche Tempelreliefs, Belanda: Gravenhage, 1936.

G. Amrit, A. Haag, and P. Carey, “The Archaeological Identification of the Majapahit Royal Palace: Prapañca's 1365 Description Projected onto Satellite Imagery”, Journal of the Siam Society, Vol. 102, 2014.

R. P. Herwindo, Data Data penelitian Hibah Ristek Dikti, 2015-2019.

G. Tjahjono, Indonesian Heritage - Architecture, Singapore: Editions Didier Millet, 1998.

R. P. Herwindo, Kajian Estetika Desain Asitektur Majapahit, LPPM Unpar, 2003.

W. P. Groeneveldt, Nusantara dalam Catatan Tionghoa, Jakarta: Komunitas Bambu, 2009.

D. Rosmalia, “Pola Ruang Lanskap Keraton Kasepuhan Cirebon”, Prosiding Semarnusa IPLBI, B074-082, Maret 2018, Surabaya: Laboratorium Perkembangan Arsitektur, Departemen Arsitektur ITS, 2018 https://doi.org/10.32315/sem.2.b074.

I. Purnama, “Konsep Tata Ruang dan Bangunan Keraton Kasepuhan Cirebon”, Seminar Nasional SCAN#6, 2015.

H. I. Dewi, Anisa, “Akulturasi Budaya pada Perkembangan Kraton Kasepuhan Cirebon”, Proceeding PESAT (Psikologi, Ekonomi, Sastra, Arsitektur & Sipil), Vol.3, Depok: Universitas Gunadarma, Oct 2009.

I. H. Agustina, A. M. Ekasari, I. Fardani, “Sistem Ruang Keraton Kanoman dan Keraton Kacirebonan”, Ethos (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat), Vol 6, No. 1, pp. 68-81, Januari 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.29313/ ethos.v6i1.3543.

LPPM Unpar, Data-Data Pendokumentasian Keraton-Keraton di Cirebon tahun 2016-2019.

M. M. Rahman, “Islamic Architecture and Arch”, International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 8-16, 2015, DOI: 10.11113/ijbes.v2.n1.52.

D. Cruickshank, Sir Banister Fletcher's: A History of Architecture Twentieth Edition, Oxford: Architectural Press, 1996.

I G. N. W. Hardy, “Aplimon Jerobisonif, Makna Simbolis Kori Agung Dalam Kehidupan Ritual Masyarakat Hindu di Bali”, Jurnal Gewang, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 16-22, April, 2020.

M. Fathurrahman, Tata ruang dan ornamen Masjid Agung Sang Cipta Rasa dan Makam Sunan Gunung Jati ditinjau dari relasinya dengan arsitektur Hindu-Majapahit, Cina, Jawa-Islam, dan Kolonial, Skripsi Arsitektur, Unpar, 2017

F. Paramarini, “Wadasan as an Architectural Element in Gua Sunyaragi Water Park, Cirebon”, Jurnal RISET ARSITEKTUR "RISA", Vol 3, No 01, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.26593/risa.v3i01.3177.51-70

Y. Mandiri, “Ekspresi Majapahit dalam Ornamen Bangunan Masjid Sang Cipta Rasa Cirebon”, Prosiding Seminar Heritage IPLBI, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.32315/sem.1.a117.

A. E. Wahby, The Architecture of the Early Mosques and Shrines of Java: Influences of the Arab Merchants in the 15th and 16th Centuries, Dissertation in der Fakultät Geistes und Kulturwissenschaften (GuK) der Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, 2007.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/jia.v7i1.13211

Refbacks