Limas House Horizontal Proportion and Dulang Module: The Collectivism of Austronesian, Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, and Islam in Palembang History
Abstract
The development of Palembang city is progressing rapidly while traditional limas houses are increasingly rare. As a result, the local context regarding the rules for building limas has become rare and not documented. This is unfortunate considering that limas have architectural and cultural records related to the history of Palembang City, starting from the Austronesian, Hindu-Buddhist, and Taoist to the Islamic period. This study seeks to find the rules of horizontal proportion used in the construction of limas and their relation with the cultural values of society. Researchers explored the dulang,a circular container that holds plates for serving food to eight people, as the base module that builds the floor area of a limas. Data were collected from 50 limas in Palembang City, consisting of 20 four-bengkilas limas (4BL) and 30 three-bengkilas limas (3BL). The results show that 3BL is generally made with four dulang on the front and seven dulang on the side. In comparison, 4BL are built with five dulang on the semi-public side of the bengkilas, three dulang on the back, and seven dulang on the side. Furthermore, the researcher shows that this proportion rule is changed across time in line with the smaller house size. This change signifies the decline of collectivism from a concrete principle to a merely symbolic one. This decline is associated with an increase in the individual's economy and standard of living. This research has implications for efforts to standardize the Palembang limas house model for conserving the city's cultural heritage.
Keywords
Full Text:
pdfReferences
M. Khamdevi, “The Characteristics Linkage Among Austronesian Houses: The Traditional Houses in Luhak Agam, Rokan, and Mandailing,” AMERTA, Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Arkeologi, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 147–162, 2021.
M. P. Leadbetter, "The fluid city, urbanism as process," World Archaeology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 137–157, Jan. 2021, doi:
1080/00438243.2021.2001367.
D. H. Purnama, M. Mulyanto, and Y. Yulasteriyani, “Representation of Cultural Identity in Limas House Palembang,” dimensi, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 47–54, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.9744/dimensi.48.1.47‐54.
G. A. H. Sibarani and A. S. Ekomadyo, “Penguraian Tanda (Decoding) Pada Rumah Limas Dengan Pendekatan Semiotika,” Journal of Architectural Discourses, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 51, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.24167/tesa.v19i1.3123.
S. Rashid, N. Baharuddin, K. Alauddin, and K. Alauddin, "Architectural Characteristics of Malay Traditional Houses Through Decorative Elements: A Comparison between Perak Limas' House (PLH) and Johor Limas' House (JLH),"MySE, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 87–102, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.24191/myse.v8i1.12662.
M. S. A. Rashid, M. N. Baharuddin, K. Alauddin, and I. A. H. Choo, “Decorative Elements of Traditional Malay House: Comparative Study of Rumah Limas Bumbung Perak (RLBP) and Rumah Limas Johor (RLJ),” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 385, no. 1, p. 012022, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1755‐1315/385/1/012022.
B. Wicaksono, A. Siswanto, S. Kusdiwanggo, and W. F. F. Anwar, "Functional Changes of Under Stilt House as an Effort of Adaptation and Adjustment in Settlement," IJEAT, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3543–3551, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.35940/
ijeat.A2684.109119.
W. F. F. Anwar, "The Building Performance of Limas House; Dealing with Current Context," J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1198, no. 8, p. 082029, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742‐6596/1198/8/082029.
I. Aziz, A. Siswanto, N. P. Sueca, and D. H. Purnama, “The Facade Proportion of Three‐Bengkilas Limas House in Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia,” 2020, pp. 81–87.
Glottolog, "Malayic Language Tree," Glottolog. 2020.
T. Alvin and Y. Gunawan, "Joglo Architecture Development for Post Earthquake Temporary Shelter," Junal RISA (Riset Arsitektur), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 205–221, 2019.
J. Chandra and J. H. Y. Sihotang, "Sopo Batak Toba Resilience Tectonics toward Earthquake: Study Object ‐ Sopo Nagari Sihotang," Jurnal RISA (Riset Arsitektur), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 222–239, 2019.
N. Arsyi, I. I. Rappun, V. Vausia, and M. Hasyim, "The concept of equilibrium of tough objects in saoraja lapinceng traditional house in barru regency," J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1899, no. 1, p.012123, May 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742‐6596/1899/1/012123.
A. Ali, “Kajian Bentuk Dan Makna Simbolik Rumah Adat Gorontalo (Studi Kasus Bangunan Hasil Rekonstruksi Rumah Adat Bantayo Po’Boide Kabupaten Gorontalo),” Universitas Komputer Indonesia, 2019.
G. C. Kiasif, "The Effects of Natural Environmental Data in the Traditional Japanese House Design," IJAR, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 361–371, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.21474/IJAR01/7370.
Z. A. Wazir and I. Indriani, “Vernacular Answers to Spatial Needs of Human Activities: Indonesian Houses,” dimensi, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 141–154, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.9744/dimensi.46.2.141‐154.
Fitriah, “Nilai Kearifan Lokal dalam Tradisi ‘Ngobeng’ di Desa Seri Bandung Kecamatan Tanjung Batu Kabupaten Ogan Ilir,” Tamaddun: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Sastra Islam, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 39–49, 2019.
Wirdanengsih, “Makna dan Tradisi‐Tradisi dalam Rangkaian Tradisi Khatam Qur’an Anak‐Anak di Nagari Balai Gurah Sumatera Barat,”Gender Equality: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 9–24, 2019.
L. Kamarudin and U. Jayadi, “Budaya Bereqe Sasak Lombok sebagai Upaya Melestarikan Nilai Religius dan Jati Diri Masyarakat Montong Baan Kecamatan Sikur Lombok Timur,” Berajah Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–49, 2021.
T. Teffera, Ethiopian Magnificent Holidays: A Case Study of the Ašända Feast. Timkehet Teffera, 2019.
S. Bhudiharty, K. Ratnasari, and D. Marizka, “Analisis Potensi Wisata Bahari dan Budaya di Belitung, Kab. Belitung Barat,” Jurnal Industri Pariwisata, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 36–51, 2019.
L. S. Kasih, G. W. Bayu, and I. N. L. Jayanta, “The Ethnopedagogy Study on the ‘Megibung’ Tradition in Karangasem,” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 103–109, 2019.
A. Mardiana, M. Idris, and Wandiyo, “Konsep Batanghari Sembilan dalam Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Melayu Sumatera Selatan sebagai Sumber Pembelajaran Sejarah Lokal,”Kalpataru: Jurnal Sejarah dan Pembelajaran
Sejarah, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2022.
J. C. Jackson, J. Watts, J.‐M. List, C. Puryear, R. Drabble, and K. A. Lindquist, "From Text to Thought: How Analyzing Language Can Advance Psychological Science," Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2022.
J. Tan, J. Leng, X. Zeng, D. Feng, and P. Yu, "Digital Twin for Xiegong's Architectural Archaeological Research: A Case Study of Xuanluo Hall, Sichuan, China," Buildings, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1053, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12071053.
D. Yu, "Why Do I Buy Number 8? A Sequential Mixed Methods Study on Auspicious Consumption in China," Iowa State University, 2020.
R. Heine‐Geldern, Conceptions of state and kingship in Southeast Asia. Cornell University Press, 2018.
S. J. Kassim and Z. Kamaruddin, "Urban Syncretism: Conscious and Unconscious Architectural Formation of National Identity,"in Modernity, Nation and Urban‐Architectural Form, S. J. Kassim, Ed. Kuala Lumpur, 2018, pp. 209–234. doi: 10.1007/978‐3‐319‐66131‐5.
S. M. Baqi, Shahih Bukhari Muslim. Penerbit Jabal, 2020.
Y. Han, H. Li, Y. Xiao, A. Li, and T. Zhu, "Influential Path of Social Risk Factors toward Suicidal Behavior—Evidence from Chinese Sina Weibo Users 2013–2018," IJERPH, vol. 18, no. 5, p. 2604, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052604.
Z. Gong, C. Li, X. Jiao, and Q. Qu, "Does Resilience Help in Reducing Burnout Symptoms Among Chinese Students? A Meta‐Analysis,"Front. Psychol., vol. 12, p. 707792, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.707792.
F. Li, Y. Liu, and T. Meng, "Discursive strategy of opinion expression and government response in China: Text analysis based on online petitions," Telematics and Informatics, vol. 42, p. 101238, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2019.06.001.
Huang Z. et al., "Increasing Individualism and Decreasing Collectivism? Cultural and Psychological Change Around the Globe," Adv Psychol Sci, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 2068–2080, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.02068.
Y. Ogihara, "Economic shifts and cultural changes in individualism: A cross‐temporal perspective," in Socioeconomic environment and human psychology: Social, ecological, and cultural perspectives, A. Uskul and S. Oishi, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 247–270.
G. Sappor, "A Comparative Study of Filial Piety in Beijing and the UK," JECS, vol. 5, no. 1, p. p22, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.22158/jecs.v5n1p22.
H. Cai, Z. Huang, and Y. Jing, "Living in a Changing World: The Change of Culture and Psychology," in The Handbook of Culture and Psychology, Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 786–818. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190679743.003.0023.
M. I. Hasan, B. Noor Prabowo, and H. H. Bava Mohidin, “An Architectural Review of Privacy Value in Traditional Indonesian Housings: Framework of Locality‐Based on Islamic Architecture Design,” JDBE, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 21–28, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.22452/jdbe.vol21no1.3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/jia.v7i2.17235
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Islamic Architecture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
EDITORIAL OFFICE
Department of Architecture, Faculty of Science and Technology
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Phone (+62) 341 558933,Facsimile (+62) 341 558933
e-mail: journal.islamicarchitecture@gmail.com / jia@uin-malang.ac.id
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.