Semantic and Syntactic Dimensional Analysis: The Case of Süleymaniye Mosque

Birgül Çakıroğlu, Reyhan Akat

Abstract


In this study, it is acknowledged that sacred concepts influence the formation of sacred spaces and serve as a non-verbal language of expression. Accordingly, the research examines how the concrete manifestations of sacred concepts in Islam are reflected in the design principles shaping mosque architecture. The scope of the study is limited to five sacred concepts in Islam: wahdaniyet (unity), beka (eternity), ilim (knowledge), might, and the hereafter. The effects of these five concepts on the architectural design of the Süleymaniye Mosque, selected as the case study, were investigated. Data were collected through literature review, on-site visual observation and examination, and photography. The semiotic method was employed to conduct semantic and syntactic analyses of the obtained data. As a result, sub-concepts derived from the main sacred concepts were identified, and the semantic dimensions of these sub-concepts, along with the design principles reflected in their syntactic dimensions, were presented in separate tables. The findings indicate that the fundamental design principles reflected in each sacred concept in the semantic dimension predominantly embody unity and appropriateness. This study is significant as it provides a reference for the tangible expression of abstract sacred concepts that shape religious buildings, ensuring their design aligns with their intended spiritual functions. Moreover, the proposed analytical model is expected to make a valuable contribution to the literature and to architectural design education by offering a semiotic framework for interpreting sacred meanings, thereby facilitating the design of religious spaces.

Keywords


Religion; Semiotics; Basic design principles; Wahdaniyet; Beka; Ilim; Might; Hereafter; Süleymaniye Mosque

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] T. Burckhardt, Art of Islam: Language and meaning. World Wisdom, Inc, 2009.

[2] S. H. Nasr, Islamic art and spirituality. Suny Press, 1987.

[3] N. Ardalan and L. Bakhtiar, The sense of unity: the Sufi tradition in Persian architecture, University of Chicago Press, 1973.

[4] O. Grabar, The Mediation of Ornament, Princeton University Press, 1992.

[5] A. K. H. Solihu, “Revelation and Prophethood in the Islamic Worldview,” J. Islam Asia, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 167, 2009, doi: 10.31436/jia.v6i1.5.

[6] S. H. Nasr and A. Demirhan, Islam sanatı ve maneviyatı. Insan yayinlari, 1992.

[7] T. Burckhardt, Fes: Stadt des Islam. CH Beck, 2015.

[8] M. Eliade, Rites and symbols of initiation: The mysteries of birth and rebirth. Spring Publ., 2003.

[9] D. Kuban and C. Emden, Osmanlı mimarisi. Yapi-Endustri Merkezi, 2007.

[10] M. Weber, Protestan ahlakı ve kapitalizmin ruhu. 2015.

[11] S. Omer, “Islamic Architecture and the Prospects of its Revival,” J. Islam. Thought Civiliz., vol. 01, no. 02, pp. 103–121, 2011, doi: 10.32350/jitc.12.07.

[12] O. Grabar, “İslam Sanatının oluşumu, çev,” Nuran Yavuz, İstanbul, 1998.

[13] M. Kashef, “Critical analysis of design paradigms in Islamic architecture: A study of interiority, versatility and cellularity,” Islam. Hist. Lit, vol. 3, pp. 5–26, 2025.

[14] O. Şimşek, “Sustainability Aspects in Mosque Architecture: From the Beginning to the Present,” Diyanet İlmi Dergi, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1175–1206, 2024.

[15] A. Alnajjar and T. E. Dinçel, “Changing Forms and Functions: The Transformation of Mosque Architecture from The Early Islamic Period to The Present,” Mekansal Çalışmalar Derg., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 94–106, 2024.

[16] S. Salem, “Defining without Essences: Ibn Taymiyya’s Critique of Aristotelian Logic,” Logica Universalis, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-025-00404-3.

[17] S. Hamza, “Tajriba: An interview with Dr. Zarin Fatima on experiential knowledge in medicine,” postmedieval, pp. 1–11, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-025-00380-3.

[18] Z. Nazar, B. Ali, P. Rutter, and N. Barnes, “Islamic reasoning and the use of prohibited medicines among Muslim patients: a qualitative study,” Int. J. Clin. Pharm., Vol. 47, pp. 2083–2093, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-02046-3

[19] J. Faradis and M. Y. Afandi, “Continuance intention of Islamic internet-only banks: lessons learned from Indonesian users,” J. Financ. Serv. Mark., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-025-00333-8

[20] G. Necipoğlu, The Topkapi scroll: geometry and ornament in Islamic architecture. Getty Publications, 1996.

[21] D. F. Ruggles, Islamic gardens and landscapes. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.

[22] N. Nasser, “Sacred Geometry: The Spiritual Meaning of Islamic Architectural Technologies,” Acsf, 2024.

[23] S. M. N. Al–Attas, Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam. UTM Press, 2014.

[24] A. Bokhari, M. T. M. Hammad, and D. Beggas, “Impact of Islamic values and concepts in architecture: A case study of Islamic communities,” Proc. Sustain. Dev. Plan. XI, vol. 241, pp. 383–396, 2020. DOI: 10.2495/SDP.200311.

[25] M. TATAR, “Reflections of the Belief in Tawhid in Mosque Architecture through the Examples of Damascus Umayyad and Selimiye Mosque Şam Ümeyye ve Selimiye Cami Örnekleri Üzerinden Cami Mimarisinde Tevhîd İnancının Yansımaları,” Osmanli Medeni. Arastirmalari Derg., vol. 24, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21021/osmed.1547812

[26] H. S. Almamoori, “Courtyard is basic pattern in tradition Islamic architecture: as prototype,” in 12th International conference on Standardization, Porotypes and quality a means of Balkan countries collaboration (Turkey), Vol. 12, 2015.

[27] E. Kuruçay and Ö. Ediz, “Computational analysis of visual complexity in architecture: Şehzade Mosque, Süleymaniye Mosque and Selimiye Mosque,” J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 1495–1507, 2025. DOI: 10.17341/gazimmfd.1476466

[28] R. İzol, M. A. Gürel, Ç. Mollamahmutoğlu, and F. Avcil, “Evaluation of the Buttress System of a Great Ottoman Mosque Against Gravity Loads and Horizontal Seismic Forces: The Case of the Istanbul Süleymaniye Mosque", Buildings, vol. 15, No. 8, pp. 1360, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15081360

[29] B. Çakıroğlu, R. Akat, E. O. Çakıroğlu, and T. Taşdemir, “Semantic and Syntactic Dimensional Analysis of Rural Wooden Mosque Architecture in Borçka,” Buildings, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 297, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15020297

[30] F. D. K. Ching, Architecture, Form, Space and Order (7th ed.), YEM Publications, 1979.

[31] W. M. Michelson, Behavioral research methods in environmental design, New York: Halsted Press, 1975.

[32] L. K. GÜRER, TEMEL TASARIM (Basic Design) EĞİTİMİNDE FORM’UN ELEMANLARI. ITU Press, 2023.

[33] Z. Kuban, “Introducing Doğan Kuban’s Istanbul Bibliography.” YILLIK: Annual of Istanbul Studies, Vol. 3, pp. 203 - 211, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53979/yillik.2021.14.

[34] C. Tavsan, F. Tavsan, and E. Sonmez, “Biomimicry in architectural design education,” Procedia-social Behav. Sci., vol. 182, pp. 489–496, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.832.

[35] I. H. Güngör, Basic Design (2nd Edition), AFA Matbaacılık, 1983.

[36] R. Stouffs and B. Tunçer, “Typological Descriptions as Generative Guides for Historical Architecture,” Nexus Netw. J., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 785–805, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00004-015-0260-x.

[37] R. Stouffs, “On shape grammars, color grammars and sortal grammars,” Proc. eCAADe 2012, vol. 1, pp. 479–487, 2012.

[38] S. M. Şener and E. Görgül, “A shape grammar algorithm and educational software to analyze classic Ottoman mosques,” A| Z ITU J. Fac. Archit., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 12–30, 2008.

[39] S. Bozdoğan, Modernism and nation building: Turkish architectural culture in the early republic, Washington: University of Washington Press, 2001.

[40] A. Özdural, “Mathematics and arts: Connections between theory and practice in the medieval Islamic world,” Hist. Math., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 171–201, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/hmat.1999.2274

[41] S. E. Rasmussen, Experiencing Architecture, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1959.

[42] D. Kuban, “The style of Sinan’s domed structures,” Muqarnas, vol. 4, pp. 72–97, 1987.

[43] S. Tekeli, “Examining Istanbul from a Semiotic Perspective”, Master's Thesis, Istanbul Arel University, Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul, 2016.

[44] U. Kalpaklı, “A Study on Architectural Indicator-Object Relations (Sign-Symbol-Symbol)”, Master's Thesis, Yıldız Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, İstanbul, 1998.

[45] S. E. Okuyucu, “Semiotic Evaluation of the Courtyard in Contemporary Educational Buildings”, Doctoral Thesis, Selçuk University, Institute of Science and Technology, Konya, 2011.

[46] G. Peker, “Analysis of the Façade Character of Russian Period Buildings in Kars with a Semiotic Approach”, Master's Thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Science and Technology, Konya, 2021.

[47] A. B. Özsoy, “A Semiotic Method Proposal in the Context of Communication in Architecture: Edirne Example”, Doctoral Thesis, Trakya University, Institute of Science and Technology, Edirne, 2022.

[48] O. O. Reisoğlu, “The Place of Symmetry in Visual Expression, Master's Thesis”, Anadolu University, Institute of Fine Arts, Eskişehir, 2010.

[49] G. Ülger, “Reading the Relationship Between Worship Ritual and Place of Worship in a Semiotic Context: Cemevi Structures”, Master's Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, İstanbul, 2013.

[50] O. Altun, “Semiotic Analysis of Touristic Buildings of Istanbul: Examples of Hagia Sophia and Sultan Ahmet Mosque”, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Istanbul University, Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul, 2021.

[51] A. Günes, “Reading the architecture of a work with a semiotic approach or architectural semiotics: Divriği Ulucami and Hospital”, Erciyes İletişim Magazine, Vol. 3, No.2, 2013.

[52] M. Çetin, “Examination of Süleymaniye Mosque in Terms of Semiotics”, Master's Thesis, Istanbul Arel University, Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul, 2015.

[53] C. Demirci, “Semiotic Analysis of Contemporary Sacred Places within the Scope of Sacred Space Archetypes and Basic Design Principles”, Master's Thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Fine Arts, İstanbul, 2023.

[54] B. Çakıroğlu, “Reflections of the Basic Concepts in the Islamic Religion on the Religious Architecture of the Ottoman Period (13th-17th centuries)”. Doctoral Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, Trabzon, 2006.

[55] D. Borden, J. Elzanowski, C. Lawrenz, D. Miller, A. Smith, J. Taylor, Reference Books Architecture, İstanbul: NTV Publications, 2010.

[56] H. D. Yıldız, Anatolian Turkish History, Anatolian Civilizations Visual Encyclopedia of Anatolian History, 3 Volumes. İstanbul: Visual Publications, 1982.

[57] R. Günay, Why Mimar Sinan is a Design Genius, İstanbul: Yem Yayın, 2019.

[58] R. Günay, Mimar Sinan and His Works, 1st Edition, İstanbul: Yem Yayın, 2002.

[59] O. Aslanapa, Ottoman Era Architecture, İstanbul: Revolution Bookstore, 1986.

[60] S. K. Yetkin, Turkish Architecture, 1st Edition, Ankara: Bilgi Publishing House, 1970.

[61] A. S. Ülgen, Architectural Drawings of Süleymaniye Mosque, from Ali Saim Ülgen Archive, 1944.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/jia.v8i4.28055

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Reyhan Akat

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

EDITORIAL OFFICE

Department of Architecture, Faculty of Science and Technology
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Phone (+62) 341 558933, Facsimile (+62) 341 558933
e-mail: journal.islamicarchitecture@gmail.com / jia@uin-malang.ac.id

 

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.