Dialektika Agama dan Budaya dalam Tradisi Selamatan Pernikahan Adat Jawa di Ngajum, Malang
Abstract
Empirical analysis on the religion and culture dialectics in the selamatan ritual of Javanese wedding has not been explored by teologist, social scientist or religion anthropologist. Their studies on such a case mostly concern with ontological-philological text analysis not directly related with the religious tradition and socio-culture which is more dynamic and realistic. This study employs social definition paradigm and phenomenological theory approach limited to the dialectic pattern between religion and myth in the ritual selamatan of Javanese wedding. The data were collected though interviewing and observing religious leaders, ethnic leaders, and Muslim preacher in Ngajum, Malang. The study found two models of dialectic pattern namely theological-compromistic and theological-humanistic. The earlier describes the theological shift from emotional-naturalistic to rational-formalistic. The later describes the theological shift from personal to social awareness theology.
Telaah empirik seputar pola dialektika antara agama dan budaya dalam kasus ritual selamatan pernikahan adat Jawa, belum banyak dilakukan oleh para pakar agama, ilmuan sosial, maupun ilmuan antropolog agama. Kajian mereka terhadap kasus ini pada umumnya masih menekankan pada objek pembacaan teks secara ontologis-filologis, yang tidak bersinggungan secara langsung terhadap tradisi keagamaan dan budaya masyarakat yang lebih dinamis dan realistis. Penelitian ini menggunakan paradigma definisi sosial dan pendekatan teori fenomenologis, yang dibatasi pada pola dialektika antara agama dan mitos dalam kasus ritual selamatan pernikahan adat Jawa. Data diperoleh dengan cara menginterview dan mengobservasi para tokoh agama, tokoh adat, dan para da’i yang ada di Ngajum, Malang. Penelitian ini menemukan dua model yaitu pola dialektika teologis-kompromistik dan pola dialektika teologis-humanistik. Pola dialektika pertama, menggambarkan pergeseran teologis, dari teologi yang bersifat emosional-naturalistik menuju teologi yang bersifat rasional-formalistik. Adapun pola teologis-humanistik menggambarkan adanya pergeseran teologi yang bersifat personal menuju teologi yang berkesadaran sosial.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, Amin. 2001. Pendekatan Kajian Islam dalam Studi Agama. Jakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.
Askar, S. 2009. Kamus Arab-Indonesia al-Azhar. Jakarta: Senayan Publising.
Beatty, Andrew. 2001. Variasi Agama di Jawa: Suatu Pendekatan Antropologi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Bell, Catherine. 1997. Ritual Perspective and Dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bethe, E. 1987. Mythus-sage-marchen dalam Thomas F. Odea, The Sociology of Religion. tewrj. Tim Yosogama. Jakarta: Raja Wali.
Dhavamony, Mariasusai. 1995. Fenomenologi Agama. Yogyakarta: IKAPI.
Durkheim, Emile. 1976. The Elementary Form of Religious Life. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
E.B, Tylor, 1891. Primitive Culture. London: J. Murray.
Eliade, Mircea. 1959. The Sacred & The Profane: The Nature of Religion, The Significance of Religious. Myth. Symbolism. and Ritual Within Life and Culture. United States of America: Harcourt Brace Javanovich. HBJ.
Eliade, Mircea. 1954. Cosmos And History: The Myth of The Eternal Return. Translated by Willard R. Trask. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Eliade, Mircea. 1960. Myth, Dreams And Mysteries: The Encounter between Contemporery Faiths and Archaich Realities. Translated by Philip Mairet. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Eliade, Mircea. 1975. Myth And Reality. New York: Harper & Row.
Endraswara, Suwardi. 2006. Falsafah Hidup Jawa. Cakrawala: Yogyakarta.
Geertz, Clifford. 1960. The Religion of Java. Glencoe: The Free Press.
Geertz, Clifford. 1989. Abangan, Santri, Priyayi dalam Masyarakat Jawa. Terj. Aswab Mahasin. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Gellner, Ernest. 1992. Post-modernism, Reason and Religion. London: Routledge.
Ghony, Djunaidi. 1996. “Mitos dan Praktik Mistik di Makam KH.
Hasan Syaifurrizal Desa Karangbong Pajarakan Probolinggo”. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. Volume I. No.2. IAIN Sunan Ampel Malang: Tarbiyah Press.
Hume, David. 1757. The Natural History of Religion. London: Adam & Biack.
J.G, Frazer. 1911. The Golden Bough. New York: Macmillan.
Kirk, G.S.,. Myth Its Meaning & Functions in Ancient & Other Cultures. London: University of California Press.
Lehmann, Arthur C. and Myers, James E. Magic. 1985. Witchcraft and Religion: an Anthropological Study of the Supernatural. Palo Alto and London: Mayfield Publishing Company.
Malinowski, B. 1954. “ Myth in Primitive Psichology”. dalam Magic, Science and Religion. New York.
Nursyam. 2005. Islam Pesisir. Yogyakarta: LkiS.
Pranowo, Bambang. 1998. Islam Faktual Antara Tradisi dan Relasi Kuasa. Yogyakarta: Adi Cita Karya Nusa.
QS: Ibrahim. 1971. Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya. Jakarta: Yayasan Penyelenggara Penerjemahan.
Spinoza, Benedict. 1951. Theological-Political Treatise. New York: Dover.
Waters, Malcolm. 1994. Modern Sociological Theory. London: Sage Publication.
Woodward, Mark. 1988. The Slametan: Textual Knowledge and Ritual Performance in Central Javanese Islam. History of Religion.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/el.v15i1.2671
Editorial Office: | Phone : +6282333435641 |