The Cultured Islam: The Boundary of Islamic Identity between The Minangkabau and Mandailing Ethnics
Abstract
The relationship between Islam and culture was compatible and not antonym. Islam was a dynamic product and a long-term process of giving and receiving in the dynamics and social interaction of its people. The contradiction between the ideal demands of religion and the demands of tradition and the social reality of society was a crucial problem faced by any religion in the world, but adjustments to social reality always occurred. The Islamic community in the Minangkabau border area was a cultural community that had and continued to confirm genuinely and became accommodative openness in resolving the contradictions of adat and Islam which were in principle very apparent in their cultural systems. Through ethnographic research, this article revealed that conflicts and contradiction between the normative concepts of Islam and adat always occurred in societies inhabited by the Minangkabau and Mandailing ethnic groups, especially related to marriage, kinship, inheritance system and communal property ownership. But the process always ran elegantly and attractively through the dialectics and dynamics of the people. Thus, Islam was culturally acculturated with Minangkabau culture and Mandailing culture and formed a distinctive cultural Islamic identity in the border area.
Relasi Islam dengan kebudayaan adalah sesuatu yang selaras dan bukan antonim. Islam adalah produk dinamis dan proses dalam jangka panjang, yang saling memberi dan menerima dalam dinamika dan interaksi sosial masyarakatnya. Kontradiksi antara tuntutan ideal agama dan tuntutan tradisi serta realitas sosial masyarakat merupakan persoalan krusial yang dihadapi agama apapun di dunia, namun penyesuaian realitas sosial selalu terjadi. Masyarakat Islam di daerah perbatasan Minangkabau adalah komunitas budaya yang telah dan terus melakukan konfirmitas secara genuine serta akomodatif terbuka dalam menyelesaikan kontradiksi adat dan Islam yang secara prinsip sangat kentara dalam sistem budaya mereka. Melalui penelitian etnografi, artikel ini mengungkap bahwa konflik dan pertentangan antara konsep normatif Islam dengan adat selalu terjadi dalam masyarakat yang dihuni oleh etnik Minangkabau dan etnik Mandailing, terutama masalah perkawinan, kekerabatan, sistem kewarisan dan kepemilikan harta komunal. Namun proses itu selalu berjalan secara elegan dan atraktif melalui dialektika dan dinamika masyarakatnya. Sehingga, Islam secara kultur berakulturasi dengan budaya Minangkabau dan budaya Mandailing dan membentuk identitas Islam kultur yang khas di daerah perbatasan
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, T. 1966. Adat and Islam: An Examination of Conflict in Minangkabau. Indonesia, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/3350753
Amri, Y. K., Sinar, S., & Saragih, A. 2016. Depreciation of Understanding Lexicon in Traditional Wedding Ceremony in South Tapanuli Medan. European Journal of English Language an Literature Studies, 4, 3.
Amster, M. H. 1999. Reviewed Work: In the Shadow of Migration: Rural Women and Their Households in North Tapanuli, Indonesia by Janet Rodenburg. Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 13(2), 124–126.
Andaya, L. Y. 2002. The trans-Sumatra trade and the ethnicization of the ‘Batak.’ Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 158(3), 367–409. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003770
Beckmann, F. von B. 1999. Multiple Contructions of Socio-economic Spaces: Resource Management and Conflict in the Central Moluccas. In Frontiers and Borderlands: Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 131–158). Peter Lang.
Benda, F. von B. 2007. Ambivalent Identities, Decentralization and Minangkabau Political Communities. In Renegotiating Boundaries: Local Politic in Post Suharto Indonesia (pp. 417–442). KITLV Press.
Biezevelt, R. 2010. Ragam Peran Adat di Sumatera Barat. In J. S. Davidson (Ed.), Adat dalam Politik Indonesia (pp. 201–222). KITLV Jakarta-Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Blackwood, E. 1994. The politics of daily life: Gender, kinship and identity in a Minangkabau village, West Sumatra, Indonesia. Stanford University.
Bonate, L. J. K. 2017. Islam and matriliny along the Indian Ocean rim: Revisiting the old “paradox” by comparing the Minangkabau, Kerala and coastal northern Mozambique. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 48(3), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463417000571
Chadwick, R. J. 1991. Matrilineal inheritance and migration in a Minangkabau community. Indonesia, (51), 47–81.
Djurip. 2000. Budaya Masyarakat Suku Bangsa Minangkabau di Kabupaten Pasaman Propinsi Sumatera Barat. Padang: Proyek Pengkajian dan Pembinaan Nilai-nilai Budaya Sumatera Barat.
Dobbin, C. 1983. Islamic Revivalism in a Changing Peasant Economy Central Sumatera 1784-1847. Curzon Press.
Erman, E. 2006. Adat dan Seni Budaya Rao. In M. B. Lubis (Ed.), Rao di Sana Sini (p. 20). Jaro Press.
Evers, & Korff. 1992. Images of a Sumatera Town, Padang and the Rise of Urban Symbol in Indonesia. University of Bielefeld Press.
Februhartanty, J., Usfar, A. A., Dianawati, E., Fransisca, D. O., Roshita, A., & Fahmida, U. 2007. Psychosocial care and nutritional status of children aged 6-36 months among patrilineal (Karo) and matrilineal (Minangkabau) households in Jakarta. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 16(2), 293–300.
Franzia, E. 2017. Cultural Wisdom of Minangkabau Ethnic Community for Local – Global Virtual Identity. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 325–329. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n1p325
Franzia, E., Piliang, Y. A., & Saidi, A. I. 2015. Manifestation of Minangkabau Cultural Identity through Public Engagement in Virtual Community. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184(August 2014), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.053
Graves, E. 2009. The Minangkabau response to Dutch colonial rule in the nineteenth century. Equinox Publishing.
Hadler, J. 2008. Muslim and Matriarchs: Cultural Resilience an Indonesia through Jihad and Colonialism. Cornell University Press.
Hamka. 1968. Ayahku. Bulan Bintang.
Harahap, M., Faruk, F., & Salam, A. 2019. Hybridization in Mandailing Culture: An Overview of Willem Iskander’s Text Si Bulus-Bulus Si Rumbuk-Rumbuk. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(5), 38–49.
Hazairin. 1967. Hukum Kekeluargaan Nasional. Tintamas.
Iman, D. T., & Mani, A. V. 2017. Marriage Practices aMong FeMale Minangkabau Migrants in Indonesia. Marriage, 4, 67–90.
Kahn, J. S. 1976. “Tradition”, matriliny and change among the Minangkabau of Indonesia. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 132(1), 64–95. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90002655
Klopfer, L. 1994. Confronting modernity in a rice-producing community: contemporary values and identity among the highland Minangkabau of West Sumatra, Indonesia. University of Pennsylvania. https://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI9521058
Lubis, A.-R., & Khoo, S. N. 2003. Raja Bilah and the Mandailings in Perak, 1875-1911 (Vol. 35). Areca Books.
Lubis, A. 2001. Identity the Politics of Identity Construction : the Case of the Mandailing, 115–133.
Lubis, A. 2005. Mandailing Islam Across Borders. Taiwan Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2(2), 55–98.
Lubis, S. n.d. Integrasi Sosial dan Komunikasi Antar Budaya di Kalangan Etnik Batak Toba dan Etnik Cina di Kota Medan.
Milner, A. 1978. Rau. In Encyclopaedia van Nederlandsch-Indie (p. 342). The Hagu Press.
Nofiardi, N., & Rozi, S. 2017. Penerapan nilai toleransi antar budaya dalam pelaksanaan hukum kewarisan Islam pada masyarakat perbatasan di Rao Pasaman Sumatera Barat. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 17(1), 85–112.
Noviardi, N., & Rozi, S. 2017. Penerapan nilai toleransi antar budaya dalam pelaksanaan hukum kewarisan Islam pada masyarakat perbatasan di Rao Pasaman Sumatera Barat. Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 17(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v17i1.85-112
Pelly, U. 1983. Urbanisasi dan Adaptasi di Indonesia: Studi terhadap Etnis Minangkabau dan Batak Mandailing di Kota Medan. LP3ES.
Sairin, S. 2002. Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat Indonesia, Tinjauan Antropologi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Simon, G. M. 2009. The soul freed of cares?: Islamic prayer, subjectivity, and the contradictions of moral selfhood in Minangkabau, Indonesia. American Ethnologist, 36(2), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2009.01134.x
Simon, G. M. 2014. Caged in on the outside: Moral subjectivity, selfhood, and Islam in Minangkabau, Indonesia. University of Hawai’i Press.
Situmorang, D. R. 2018. Tradisi Sinamot dalam Adat Perkawinan dan Implikasinya terhadap Relasi Kekerabatan dalam Masyarakat Suku Batak Toba di Tarutung, Tapanuli Utara, Sumatera Utara. Universitas Brawijaya.
Syarifuddin, A. 1984. Pelaksanaan Hukum Kewarisan dalam Lingkungan Adat Minangkabau.Gunung Agung.
Tanjung, I. L., Purwanto, B., & Setyawati, N. A. 2016. Colonial Politics in Forming Ethnic Identity of Melayu Minangkabau and Batak in Tapanuli. Jurnal Humaniora, 28(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v28i1.11508
Thomas, A. E. 1979. Cultural Change and Identity: Mandailing Immigrants in West Malaysia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 10(1), 208–209.
Undri. 2004. Konflik Lahan Perkebunan 1930-1960 Studi kasus : Konflik Lahan Perkebunan Karet Rakyat di Kabupaten Pasaman Propinsi Sumatera Barat.
Undri. 2008. Hulului Anak Hulului Tona: Menelusuri Tradisi Migrasi Orang Mandailing ke Pasaman. Jurnal Suluah Media Komunikasi Kesejarahan, Kemasyarakatan dan Kebudayaan, 8(2), 32.
Undri. 2009. Migrasi, Perebutan Akses Tanah dan Penguatan Lembaga Adat: Resolusi Konfil di Rantau Minangkabau. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 11(2), 177–200.
von Benda-Beckmann, F., & von Benda-Beckmann, K. 2012. Identity in dispute: Law, religion, and identity in Minangkabau. Asian Ethnicity, 13(4), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2012.710073
von Benda-Beckmann, F., & Von Benda-Beckmann, K. 2010. Multiple embeddedness and systemic implications: Struggles over natural resources in Minangkabau since the reformasi. Asian Journal of Social Science, 38(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853110X490881
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/eh.v22i2.9021
Editorial Office: | Phone : +6282333435641 |