Evaluating U/PD Ratio and Energy Efficiency in Heat Exchangers with Novel Baffles

Aulia Rahman, Novan Habiburrahman, Winarto Winarto

Abstract


This research investigates a novel baffle configuration specifically designed to significantly reduce hydraulic resistance without sacrificing thermal capabilities. While traditional shell-and-tube heat exchangers (STHeX) are widely utilized, conventional segmental baffles frequently result in high pressure drops and the formation of thermal dead zones, directly compromising system efficiency. Existing studies have explored various modifications, yet a significant gap remains in achieving a streamlined flow that optimizes the trade-off between hydraulic resistance and thermal performance at higher mass flow rates. This research addresses this limitation by introducing trapezoidal baffles to fundamentally alter fluid dynamics, inducing a torsional flow pattern that eliminates stagnant zones and enhances mixing. Consequently, the proposed designs were numerically tested and optimized using three-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations to maximize the performance of the STHeX. The simulation results demonstrated that the Trapezoidal design offered superior hydraulic stability, maintaining pressure drops below 3200 Pa compared to over 4000 Pa in conventional segmental designs at peak flow rates (1.4 kg s⁻¹). Furthermore, this geometric modification resulted in a substantial improvement in the overall heat transfer coefficient per pressure drop (U/PD) ratio, achieving a peak efficiency of 0.9 W m⁻² K⁻¹ Pa⁻¹ compared to 0.7 W m⁻² K⁻¹ Pa⁻¹ for the conventional STHeX. This study concludes that modifying the baffle geometry into a trapezoidal profile is a vital strategy for drastically reducing hydraulic resistance while maintaining thermal performance, thereby significantly enhancing overall energy efficiency.

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Ji S, Du W jing, Wang P, Cheng L. Numerical Investigation on Double Shell‐Pass Shell‐and‐Tube Heat Exchanger with Continuous Helical Baffles. Journal of Thermodynamics. 2011 Jan;2011(1).

2. Yu C, Ren Z, Zeng M. Numerical investigation of shell-side performance for shell and tube heat exchangers with two different clamping type anti-vibration baffles. Appl Therm Eng. 2018 Mar 25;133:125–36.

3. Wen J, Yang H, Wang S, Xue Y, Tong X. Experimental investigation on performance comparison for shell-and-tube heat exchangers with different baffles. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2015;84:990–7.

4. Ji J, Li F, Shi B, Chen Q. Analysis of the effect of baffles on vibration and heat transfer characteristics of elastic tube bundles. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2022 Jul 1;136.

5. Raja S, Sivahari Shankar MS, Mathan Kumar P, Rajaganapathy C. Heat transfer analysis and enhancement in shell and tube heat exchanger using copper oxide Nano particles. In: Materials Today: Proceedings. Elsevier Ltd; 2022. p. 1732–7.

6. Lemos Cotrim S, de Araujo Machado A, Camila Lapasini Leal G, Vladimir Cardoza Galdamez E, Antônio da Silva Sá Ravagnani M. Parameters for cost estimation in shell and tube heat exchangers network synthesis: A systematic literature review on 30 years of research. Appl Therm Eng. 2022 Aug 1;213.

7. Kücük H, Ünverdi M, Senan Yılmaz M. Experimental investigation of shell side heat transfer and pressure drop in a mini-channel shell and tube heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019 Nov 1;143.

8. Gu X, Chen W, Chen C, Li N, Gao W, Wang Y. Detailed characteristics of fluid flow and its effect on heat transfer in shell sides of typical shell-and-tube heat exchangers. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 2022 Mar 1;173.

9. Bahiraei M, Naseri M, Monavari A. A CFD study on thermohydraulic characteristics of a nanofluid in a shell-and-tube heat exchanger fitted with new unilateral ladder type helical baffles. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2021 May 1;124.

10. Gu X, Zheng Z, Xiong X, Wang T, Luo Y, Wang K. Characteristics of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in the Shell Side of the Trapezoidal-like Tilted Baffles Heat Exchanger. Journal of Thermal Science. 2018 Dec 1;27(6):602–10.

11. Abbasian Arani AA, Moradi R. Shell and tube heat exchanger optimization using new baffle and tube configuration. Appl Therm Eng. 2019 Jul 5;157.

12. Liu Y, Wen J, Wang S, Tu J. Numerical investigation on the shell and tube heat exchanger with baffle leakage zones blocked. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 2021 Jul 1;165.

13. Gu X, Chen W, Fang Y, Song S, Wang C, Wang Y. Analysis of flow dead zone in shell side of a heat exchanger with torsional flow in shell side. Appl Therm Eng. 2020 Nov 5;180.

14. Milcheva I, Heberle F, Brüggemann D. Modeling and simulation of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger for Organic Rankine Cycle systems with double-segmental baffles by adapting the Bell-Delaware method. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;126:507–17.

15. Kotian S, Methekar N, Jain N, Vartak P, Naik P. Colburn vs Bell Delaware approach for evaluation of thermohydraulic performance of a shell and tube heat exchanger: A theoretical study. In: Materials Today: Proceedings. Elsevier Ltd; 2021. p. 1051–4.

16. Serna M, Jiménez A. A compact formulation of the Bell-Delaware method for heat exchanger design and optimization. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2005;83(5 A):539–50.

17. Yunus A Çengel Heat and mass transfer _ fundamentals and applications (2020, Mcgraw-Hill Education).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/jomi.v1i1.40344

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


EDITORIAL OFFICE

Department of Mechanical Engineering
Faculty of Science and Technology
Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University Malang

Jl. Locari, Tlekung, Kec. Junrejo, Kota Batu, Jawa Timur 65151.