COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE REGULATION OF SHARIA FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY IN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA
Abstract
Financial technology is a part of digital ecosystem which development is rapid and massive, so does the sharia fintech. However, conventional and sharia fintech are two different systems and should have each regulation. The problem is if sharia fintech regulations in Indonesia is appropriate. Then what about Malaysia which are considered successful in developing the sharia fintech. This study compares sharia fintech regulations in Indonesia and Malaysia. The aim is to find out the readiness of Indonesia and Malaysia in supporting the sharia fintech trend realized in the regulations. This is a qualitative research using books and academic articles as an addition to the literature and regulations as the analytical method. The results indicate that Indonesia and Malaysia try to accommodate sharia fintech regulations. Indonesia still uses The Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) and Bank Indonesia regulations, both of which do not meet the sharia principles. Meanwhile, Malaysia uses the 2013 Islamic Financial Services Act (IFSA), a law to regulate sharia compliance of the Islamic financial services sector, including the Sharia Fintech. In addition, Malaysia also has a Sharia Advisory Council as a supervisor for the Islamic financial services implementations. Malaysia’s and Indonesia’s regulations have yet answered the sharia fintech developments.
Financial technology merupakan bagian dari ekosistem digital yang perkembangannya sangat pesat dan masif, tak terkecuali fintech syariah. Namun, fintech konvensional dan syariah adalah dua sistem yang berbeda dan seharusnya memiliki peraturan yang berbeda pula. Permasalahannya apakah regulasi fintech syariah di Indonesia sudah tepat apa belum, lalu bagaimana dengan regulasi di Malaysia yang dianggap berhasil mengembangkan fintech syariah. Tujuannya adalah untuk mengetahui sejauhmana kesiapan Indonesia dan Malaysia dalam mendukung trend fintech syariah dalam regulasi. Penelitian kualitatif ini menggunakan buku dan artikel akademis sebagai tambahan literatur dan peraturan sebagai metode analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia dan Malaysia sama-sama berusaha mengakomodasi regulasi. Indonesia masih menggunakan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dan Peraturan Bank Indonesia, dan belum memenuhi prinsip syariah. Malaysia menggunakan Islamic Financial Services Act (IFSA) 2013, sebuah Undang-Undang yang mengatur kepatuhan syariah dari sektor jasa keuangan Islam. Malaysia juga memiliki Dewan Pertimbangan Syariah sebagai pengawas pelaksanaan jasa keuangan Islam. Regulasi yang dimiliki oleh Malaysia dan Indonesia belum menjawab perkembangan fintech syariah.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ab Razak, Muhammad Ilyas Bin, Nur Akma Mohd Dali, Guru Dhillon, and Azwina Wati Manaf. “Fintech In Malaysia: An Appraisal to the Need of Shariah-Compliant Regulation.” Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities 28 (December 25, 2020): 3223–33. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.28.4.40.
Alfaris, Maulana Reyza, Muhammad Waliyam Mursida, and Moch Irfan Dwi Syahroni. “Model Regulasi Financial Technology Syariah Dalam Kerangka Hukum Indonesia: Studi Perbandingan Malaysia Dan Inggris.” Jurnal Legislatif, 2019, 73–96.
Alwi, Achmad Basori. “Pembiayaan Berbasis Teknologi Informasi (Fintech) Yang Berdasarkan Syariah.” Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam 21, no. 2 (2018): 248–64.
Anggito, Albi, and Johan Setiawan. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. CV Jejak (Jejak Publisher), 2018.
Bain, Baiza. “Islamic Finance: Fintech in Islamic Finance.” The Edge Markets, July 4, 2016. http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/islamic-finance-fintech-islamic-finance.
Fachrurrazy, Muhammad, and Dirah Nurmila Siliwadi. “Regulasi Dan Pengawasan Fintech Di Indonesia: Persfektif Hukum Ekonomi Syariah,” 2020.
Fahlefi, Rizal. “Inklusi Keuangan Syariah Melalui Inovasi Fintech Di Sektor Filantropi.” IAIN Batusangkar, 2018.
Febriandika, Nur Rizqi, and Fifi Hakimi. “Analisis Kesesuaian Syariah Electronic Money Pada Bank Penerbit Uang Elektronik Di Indonesia.” An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah 7, no. 1 (2020): 213–49.
Ginantra, Ni Luh Wiwik Sri Rahayu, Janner Simarmata, Ramen A Purba, Moch Yusuf Tojiri, Amin Ama Duwila, Muhammad Noor Hasan Siregar, Lora Ekana Nainggolan, Elisabeth Lenny Marit, Acai Sudirman, and Indra Siswanti. Teknologi Finansial: Sistem Finansial Berbasis Teknologi Di Era Digital. Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.
Gomber, Peter, Robert J Kauffman, Chris Parker, and Bruce W Weber. “On the Fintech Revolution: Interpreting the Forces of Innovation, Disruption, and Transformation in Financial Services.” Journal of Management Information Systems 35, no. 1 (2018): 220–65.
Grüschow, Robert Maximilian, Jan Kemper, and Malte Brettel. “How Do Different Payment Methods Deliver Cost and Credit Efficiency in Electronic Commerce?” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 18 (2016): 27–36.
International Organization of Securities Commission. “IOSCO Research Report on Financial Technologies (Fintech).” available at http://www. iosco. org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOP D554. pdf], 2017.
John A. Pearce II, Richard B. Robinson. Manajemen Strategis Buku 2. Salemba Empat, 2014.
Laldin, Mohamad Akram, and Hafas Furqani. “Islamic Financial Services Act (IFSA) 2013 and the Sharīʿah-Compliance Requirement of the Islamic Finance Industry in Malaysia.” ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance 10, no. 1 (January 1, 2018): 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-12-2017-0052.
Manzilati, Asfi. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Paradigma, Metode, Dan Aplikasi. Universitas Brawijaya Press, 2017.
Muchlis, Ridwan. “Analisis SWOT Financial Technology (Fintech) Pembiayaan Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia (Studi Kasus 4 Bank Syariah Di Kota Medan).” AT-TAWASSUTH: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam 1, no. 1 (2018): 335–57.
Muzdalifa, Irma, Inayah Aulia Rahma, and Bella Gita Novalia. “Peran Fintech Dalam Meningkatkan Keuangan Inklusif Pada Umkm Di Indonesia (Pendekatan Keuangan Syariah).” Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah 3, no. 1 (2018).
Nadhifa, Ana Toni Roby Candra Yudha, S. EI, M. SEI, Abu Rizal Amiruddin, Alivia Fitriani Hilmi, Atika Fissilmi Kaffah, Fatimala Nur Fauzi, Ika Evarianti, Laila Maghfiroh, Nada El Nadia, Pravita Salbia Nurmanda, Putri Ayu Etika Rohmah, Riska Delta Rahayu, Riski Delta Ningtyas, Silva Syahri Rahmadhani, Siti Hasnaa Madinah, Siti Ikmalus Solikhatin, Zahrotun. Fintech Syariah : Teori dan Terapan. Scopindo Media Pustaka, 2020.
Ngafifi, Muhamad. “Kemajuan Teknologi Dan Pola Hidup Manusia Dalam Perspektif Sosial Budaya.” Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi Dan Aplikasi 2, no. 1 (2014).
Nizar, Muhammad Afdi. “Teknologi Keuangan (Fintech): Konsep Dan Implementasinya Di Indonesia [Financial Technology (Fintech): It’s Concept and Implementation in Indonesia].” University Library of Munich, Germany, 2017.
Novitarani, Anisah. “Analisis Crowdfunding Syariah Berdasarkan Prinsip Syariah Compliance Serta Implementasinya Dalam Produk Perbankan Syariah.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 12, no. 2 (2018): 247–62.
Nugroho, Arief Yuswanto, and Fatichatur Rachmaniyah. “Fenomena Perkembangan Crowdfunding Di Indonesia.” . . Ekonika 4, no. 1 (2019).
Nugroho, Lucky, and Syed Lutful Kabir Chowdhury. “Mobile Banking for Empowerment Muslim Women Entrepreneur: Evidence from Asia (Indonesia and Bangladesh).” Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review 9, no. 1 (2015).
Phan, Dinh Hoang Bach, Paresh Kumar Narayan, R Eki Rahman, and Akhis R Hutabarat. “Do Financial Technology Firms Influence Bank Performance?” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 62 (2020): 101210.
Prasaja, Mahendra Galih. “Tantangan Dan Masa Depan Financial Technology Terhadap Perkembangan Industri Keuangan Syariah Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0.” SEGMEN Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis 16, no. 2 (2020).
Rahim, Norafni Farlina, Mohammed Hariri Bakri, and Siti Norbaya Yahaya. “Fintech and Shariah Principles in Smart Contracts.” Chapter. FinTech as a Disruptive Technology for Financial Institutions. IGI Global, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7805-5.ch009.
Rukin. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia, n.d.
Rumijati, Aniek, Aris Soelistyo, Ratih Juliati, Eko Handayanto, Jihadi, Mursidi, Rahmad Wijaya, et al. Kemandirian Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Indonesia Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. UMMPress, 2020.
Setiani, Dina Dwi, Hanien Nivanty, Wardah Lutfiah, and Lilik Rahmawati. “Fintech Syariah : Manfaat Dan Problematika Penerapan Pada UMKM.” Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah 5, no. 1 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.30651/jms.v5i1.4718.
Snyder, Hannah. “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research 104 (November 1, 2019): 333–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
“State of the Global Islamic Economy 2020/2021,” 2020. https://www.inceif.org/fintech/.
“Teknologi Finansial (Fintech).” Accessed May 17, 2021. https://www.bi.go.id/id/fungsi-utama/sistem-pembayaran/ritel/financial-technology/default.aspx.
Wintermeyer, Lawrence. “The Future Of Islamic FinTech Is Bright.” Forbes. Accessed May 17, 2021. https://www.forbes.com/sites/lawrencewintermeyer/2017/12/08/the-future-of-islamic-fintech-is-bright/.
Yarli, Dodi. “Analisis Akad Tijarah Pada Transaksi Fintech Syariah Dengan Pendekatan Maqhasid.” YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 9, no. 2 (December 10, 2018). https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v9i2.4766.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v12i1.12213
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published By:
Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah
Fakultas Syariah
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jl. Gajayana No. 50, 65144 Malang, East Java, Indonesia
Telp./Fax.: (0341) 559399
Email: jurisdictie@uin-malang.ac.id
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstacting & Indexing :
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.