The Bequest Transferred Prior to Death: Between Conflict Prevention and Gender-Biased Family Asset Division

Meriyati Meriyati, JM. Muslimin, Nur Hidayah, Ahmad Rodoni

Abstract


Gender inequity in bequest practices within the Komering adat community reflects structural inequalities shaped by social, cultural, and ideological factors. Bequest is commonly practiced as a preventive mechanism to avoid inheritance disputes within families. However, this practice tends to privilege men by allocating productive assets, such as land and plantations, primarily to male heirs, while women often receive smaller shares or are positioned as secondary beneficiaries. From a social construction perspective, this pattern reflects patriarchal traditions embedded in customary practices. This study employs a qualitative approach with a socio-juridical research design to examine how social construction and patriarchal values influence bequest practices as an economic instrument within Komering families. Primary data were collected through field observations and in-depth interviews with customary leaders, family members, and women involved in bequest practices. Secondary data were obtained from legal documents, regulations, and academic literature. The analysis draws on patriarchal theory, social construction theory, and Sylvia Walby’s framework to explore the relationship between power structures and cultural legitimacy. The findings reveal that men are consistently prioritised in receiving productive assets, while women generally receive smaller portions of family wealth. This pattern is socially legitimised through norms positioning men as primary family providers. Consequently, women experience reduced access to economic resources, increased financial dependency, and weaker bargaining positions within the social structure. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-syarīah, particularly regarding asset protection and distributive justice, current bequest practices have not fully reflected principles of justice. The gap between legal ideals and social realities indicates the need for reconstructing religious understanding and encouraging social transformation. Strengthening gender-responsive policies and promoting substantive justice-based interpretations of Islamic law are therefore necessary to restore bequest practices as inclusive mechanisms that support welfare and social equity.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Manan. Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2006.

Alfred Schutz, and Thomas Luckmann. The Structures of the Life-World, Vol 1. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.

Anik Juwariyah. “Konstruksi Langen Tayub Nganjuk Dalam Perspektif Bergerian.” Jurnal Budaya Nusantara Vol.1, no. 2 (2014): 126–35.

Auda, Jasser. Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), 2008.

Auliyak, Waro Satul, and Noer Azizah. “Sistem Hibah Dalam Pembagian Warisan Perspektif Kesetaraan Gender.” EGALITA 16, no. 1 (June 2021). https://doi.org/10.18860/egalita.v16i1.10816.

Azhari, Doni, Asmuni Asmuni, and Khoiruddin Nasution. “Reassessing Tajdid An-Nikah: Maqashid Sharia and Legal Status of Illegitimate Children in Central Lombok.” Justicia Islamica 22, no. 1 (May 2025): 1.

Baining, Mellya Embun, Amri Amir, Achmad Hizazi, and Enggar Diah Puspa Arum. “Finding The Maqashid Al-Syariah Performance Model on Syariah Management Accounting Information System Values.” Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 24, no. 2 (December 2024): 2. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i2.1642.

Budiman, Arief, Muhammad Saifullah, and Bahrul Ulum. “Wājibah Will for Non-Muslim Heirs in Indonesia: A Legal Political Perspective Based on Justice and Welfare.” Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 24, no. 2 (December 2024): 223–50. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v24i2.223-250.

Ferry Adhi Dharma. “Konstruksi Realitas Sosial: Pemikiran Peter L. Berger Tentang Kenyataan Sosial.” Kanal: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 7, no. 1 (2018): 5–6.

Fitriyati, Yusida, Duski Ibrahim, Firman Muntaqo, and KN Shofyan Hasan. “Reconsidering Inheritance Equality: Gender Justice in Religious Court Decisions through the Lens of Maqashid Al-Shariah.” Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat 25, no. 1 (May 2025): 1. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v25i1.27133.

Habi, Nuraida Fitri, and Muhammad Atho Mudzhar. “Women, Islamic Law and Custom in Pucuk Induk Undang Nan Limo Manuscript of Jambi.” AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 24, no. 2 (December 2024): 233–50. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v24i2.38557.

Harnides, Harnides, Syahrizal Abbas, and Khairuddin Hasballah. “Gender Justice in Inheritance Distribution Practices in South Aceh, Indonesia.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 2 (June 2023): 1293–316. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i2.16688.

Ikhlas, Al Ikhlas Al, Desi Yusdian, Alfurqan Alfurqan, Murniyetti Murniyetti, and Nurjanah Nurjanah. “The Concept of Maqasid Al-Shariah As an Instruments of Ijtihad According to Imam al-Shatibi in al-Muwafaqat Fi Ushuli Al-Shariah.” Media Syari’ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial 23, no. 2 (December 2021): 206–19. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v23i2.10138.

Lexy. J. Moleong. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 1991.

Lubis, Rusdi Rizki, Asmuni Asmuni, Tamyiz Mukharrom, Candra Boy Seroza, and Aisyah Kahar. “Towards Legal Justice: Expanding Criteria for Obligatory Bequests in Unregistered Wives in Polygamous Marriages.” Al-Ahkam 35, no. 1 (April 2025): 117–46. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2025.35.1.25358.

Mahmudi, Zaenul, M. Fauzan Zenrif, Abdul Haris, Ahsin Dinal Mustafa, and Noer Yasin. “The Charity Values within Islamic Law of Inheritance in Malang: Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah and Social Construction Perspectives.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 8, no. 3 (August 2024): 1324–45. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i3.19986.

Mansour Fakih. Analisis Gender Dan Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.

Masduki, Masduki, Dzulfikar Rodafi, and Syamsu Madyan. “The Concept of Madurese Customary Inheritance from the Perspective of Anthropology and Islamic Law.” Urwatul Wutsqo: Jurnal Studi Kependidikan Dan Keislaman 14, no. 2 (July 2025): 706–24. https://doi.org/10.54437/urwatulwutsqo.v14i2.2384.

Mohammad Hashim Kamali. Shari‘ah Law: An Introduction. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2008.

Nasution, Hotnidah, and Ahmad Rifqi Muchtar. “Negotiating Islamic Law: The Practice of Inheritance Distribution in Polygamous Marriages in Indonesian Islamic Courts.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, June 12, 2024, 125–44. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v18i1.10921.

Nindito, Stefanus. “Fenomenologi Alfred Schutz: Studi Tentang Konstruksi Makna Dan Realitas Dalam Ilmu Sosial.” Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI 2, no. 1 (2005). https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v2i1.254.

Okuda, Kazuhiko. “The Social Phenomenology of Alfred Schutz.” American Political Science Review 70, no. 1 (March 1976): 174–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400282907.

Putra, Herianto, and Desi Anwar. “Muhammad Shahrur’s Perspective on Gender Equality in Inheritance Distribution.” Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law 6, no. 2 (2023): 56–72. https://doi.org/10.35719/ijil.v6i2.2018.

Sadari -, Lazuardi Fadhlan Arrazy, and Ummah Karimah. “Reinterpreting Gender Justice in Islamic Inheritance Law: A Critical Analysis of The Compilation of Islamic Law.” YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 16, no. 2 (December 2025): 397–324. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v16i2.26359.

Safitri, Hani Hasnah, and Agus Khumaedy. “Gender Equality in the Distribution of Inheritance Property from Al-Qur’an and Mawaris Fiqh’s Perspective.” Mutawasith: Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (June 2024): 54–63. https://doi.org/10.47971/mjhi.v7i1.765.

Saleh, Fauzi. “Hibah Ayah Kepada Anak Perempuan Dalam Perspektif Fiqh Gender.” Muwazah 6, no. 2 (December 2014): 147–65. https://doi.org/10.28918/muwazah.v6i2.9926.

Sholihah, Hani, Nani Nani Widiawati2, and Mohd Khairul Nazif bin Hj Awang Damit. “Reinterpretation of Justice in Islamic Inheritance Rights Based on Gender.” Al-’Adalah 21, no. 1 (June 2024): 101–24. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v21i1.21256.

Simorangkir, El Given, Sartika Puspita Sari, and Kesha Arbina Mutiara Idris. “Ketidaksetaraan Ketidaksetaraan Dalam Hak Waris Adat Batak: Tinjauan Terhadap Praktik Dan ImplementasI.” Paradigma POLISTAAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik 6, no. 1 (July 2023): 15–21. https://doi.org/10.23969/paradigmapolistaat.v6i1.8301.

Sinaga, Evan Daniel. “Konstruksi Gender Dalam Sistem Pembagian Hak Waris Masyarakat Batak Serta Implikasinya Dalam Perspektif Teologi Kristen.” Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi 12, no. 2 (April 2023). https://doi.org/10.20961/jas.v12i2.65292.

Sukiati, Sukiati. “The Practice of Hibah as a Substitute Heir Among the Javanese Family.” MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 42, no. 1 (August 2018): 59–78. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v42i1.552.

Syaikhu, Syaikhu. “Kewarisan Islam Dalam Persfektif Keadilan Gender.” El-Mashlahah 8, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.23971/maslahah.v8i2.1323.

Syvia Walby. “Theorizing Patriarchy (Review).” Canadian Woman Studies Vol. 13, no. 4 (1993): 135.

Tim Redaksi Nuansa Aulia. Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Hukum Perkawinan, Kewarisan Dan Perwakafan). Bandung: Nuansa Aulia, 2013.

Wahbah al-Zuḥaylī. Al-Fiqh al-Islāmī Wa Adillatuh, Jilid 6. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, 2002.

Yusuf, Nasruddin, Djamila Usup, Anisa Jihan Tumiwa, Naskur Bilalu, and Nurlaila Isima. “Mapalus Tradition: North Sulawesi Muslim Society in the Maqashid Syariah Discourse.” AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 20, no. 1 (May 2025): 63–93. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v20i1.14025.

Yvonna S. Lincoln, and Egon G. Guba. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1985.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v18i1.36264

Copyright (c) 2026 Meriyati et al

Published By:

Shariah Faculty Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 

 


De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar'iah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International