ȘÂḤÎḤ AL-BUKHÂRÎ'S INFLUENCE ON TAFSÎR BI AL-MAʾTHÛR: Relevance and Impact in Contemporary Quranic Studies

Jauhar Azizy, Sihabussalam Sihabussalam, Bustamin Bustamin, Shovosil Ziyodov

Abstract


Tafsîr bi al-maʾthûr holds a central position in Quranic interpretation as an authoritative approach grounded in transmitted sources. In contemporary Quranic studies, however, renewed debates concerning the reliability of riwâyah, the authority of hadith, and the methodological foundations of classical tafsîr underscore the urgency of reassessing the formative contributions of early scholars. This study addresses the need by examining al-Bukhârî’s role to the epistemological and methodological foundations of tafsîr bi al-maʾthûr, with particular attention to his exegetical practices in the kitâb al-tafsîr section of Șâḥîḥ al-Bukhârî. Employing a qualitative library-based approach, this article analyzes Șâḥîḥ al-Bukhârî as the primary source alongside classical and later tafsîr works grounded in the maʾthûr tradition. Data are examined using a relevance-and-impact analytical framework to assess both the immediate and enduring influence of al-Bukhârî’s contributions on the development of Quranic interpretive sciences. This approach enables an evaluation of al-Bukhârî not merely as a compiler of hadith but as a formative architect of exegetical methodology. The findings demonstrate that al-Bukhârî’s contribution to tafsîr bi al-maʾthûr extends beyond the preservation of prophetic reports. He significantly promoted institutionalizing riwâyah as a source of tafsîr, formulating methodological principles for source selection, and conceptualizing standards of authenticity that continue to inform exegetical practice. His rigorous validation of sanad established a systematic and selective model of Quranic interpretation that profoundly influenced subsequent tafsîr traditions. This study contributes to contemporary Quranic scholarship by clarifying the methodological legacy of al-Bukhârî and demonstrating its continued relevance for evaluating transmitted sources in modern interpretive debates.

Keywords


hadith authority; tafsîr bi al-maʾthûr; Șâḥîḥ al-Bukhârî; quranic exegesis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdel-Haleem, M. 1993. Context and Internal Relationships: Keys to Qur'anic Exegesis. In A.-K. A. Shereef & G. Hawting (Eds.), Approaches to the Qur'an. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203988848.

Abdullah, M. A. 2022. Multidisiplin, Interdisiplin, & Transdisiplin: Metode Studi Agama & Studi Islam di Era Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: IB Pustaka.

Abdurrahman, M. 2012. Imam Al-Bukhari dan Lafal al-Qur'an. Kalimah Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam, 11(1): 120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v11i1.487.

Abdus, A. M., & Adebayo, S. 2020. A Historical Study of Imam Al-Bukhari as a Pioneer of Sahih (eds. Yasin Hasbullah et al.). Sunnah Nabawiyyah and Contemporary Issues. Kuala Perlis: KUIPs Publisher.

Ahmed, Bakrei Mohammed Bakheet. 2020. "The Understanding of Hudûd Allâh in the Qur'an: Study of Thematic-Contextual Interpretation." Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam, 21(2): 337-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v21i2.10196.

Ahmed, Khaleel. 2020. "Historical Reasoning in Asbâb al-Nuzûl Methodology." Journal of Islamic Studies, 31(1): 55-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etaa001.

Ali, A. S. 1996. Al-Tafsîr bi al-Ma'thûr: The Qur'anic Exegeses of the Prophet Muhammad, his Companions, and Successors. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304 307351?sourcetype=Dissertations.

Ally, S. 2012. The Culmination of Tradition-based Tafsîr: The Qurʼân Exegesis al-Durr al-Manthûr of al-Suyûtî. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto.

Altayyar, M. S. 2014. Enhancing Qur'anic Sciences through Sahih Al-Bukari's Book of Interpretation: Specific Application to Surat Al-Fatihah. Journal of Islamic Studies, 26(1):17-44. https://jis.ksu.edu. sa/ar/node/4636.

Azizy, J. 2022. Signifikansi Kisah Musa: Sebuah Kajian Hermeneutika. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Azmi, A. S. 2017. Ahl al-Hadith Methodologies on Qur'anic Discourses in the Ninth Century: A Comparative Analysis of Ibn Hanbal and al-Bukhari. Online Journal of Research in Islamic Studies, 4(1): 17-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15364/ris17-0401-02.

Bauer, Thomas. 2011. "Structure and Meaning in Qur'anic Hermeneutics." Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 13(2): 200-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2011.0034.

Brown, J. A. C. 2009. Hadith: Muhammad's Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.

al-Bukhârî, Muhammad bin Ismail. 2012. S{ah{îh al-Bukhârî. Cairo: Dâr al-Ta'sîl.

Burton, John. 1990. The Sources of Islamic Law: Islamic Theories of Abrogation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

al-Dhahabî, Muhammad al-Sayyid Husayn. 2000. Al-Tafsîr wa al-Mufassirûn. Cairo: Maktab Wahbah.

Ganai, M. S. M. 2024. The Methodology of the Muhaddithûn in the Compilation and Exegesis of Hadîth. ISRG Journal of Art, Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2): 121-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10863367.

Ghozali, M. 2021. Belenggu Rasionalitas dalam Tafsîr bi Al-Ma'thûr. REVELATIA: Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur`an dan Tafsir, 2(2): 106-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19105/revelatia.v2i2.4944.

al-Haddar, M. 2015. Kajian Tafsir dalam Kitab Sahih Bukhari. Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Ushuluddin Dan Filsafat, 11(1): 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24239/rsy.v11i1.68.

al-Harbî, Husain bin 'Alî bin Husain. 1996. Qawâ'id al-Tarjîh'inda al-Mufassirîn. Riyadh: Dâr al-Qâsim.

Haleem, M. A. S. Abdel. 1999. Context and Internal Relationships: Keys to Qur'anic Exegesis. Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 1(1): 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.1999.1.1.1.

Hallaq, W. B. 1999. The Authenticity of Prophetic Hadîth: A Pseudo-Problem. Studia Islamica, 89: 75-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1596086.

Ikhsan, K. & Nurdin, N. 2023. Konsep dan Metode Tafsir bi al-Ma’tsur: Studi atas Karya-karya Klasik dan Kontemporer. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 23(02): 606-622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v23i2.18637.

Institute for the Study of Quran and Tafsir. 2025. Tafsir & Methods: Advanced Studies in Contemporary Qur'anic Exegesis. Jakarta: ISQT.

Ishaq, Zamroni. et al. 2025. Epistemology of Istinbaț in Quraish Shihab's Interpretation of Marriage Verses in Tafsir al-Mishbah. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam, 26(01): 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v26i1.29888.

Kathîr, A. al-F. I. I. 1998. Tafsîr al-Qur'ân al-'Azîm. Beirut: Dâr Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah.

Krippendorf, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. California: SAGE Publications.

Kulinich, A. 2022. “Personal Opinion” in Qurʾānic Exegesis: Medieval Debates and Interpretations of. Der Islam, 99(2), 476-513.

Lucas, S. 2006. The Legal Principles of Muhammad b.Ismâîl al-Bukhârî and their Relationship to Classical Salafi Islam. Islamic Law and Society, 13(03): 289-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156851906778946341.

Martin, R. C. 1982. Understanding the Qurʾan in Text and Context. History of Religions, 21(4): 361-384. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1062330.

Melchert, C. 2016. Bukhârî's Kitâb Tafsîr al-Qur'ân. Journal of the International Qur'anic Studies Association, 1(1): 149-172. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5913/jiqsa.1.2017.a008.

Mudin, M. 2016. Epistemologi Tafsir al-Qur'an bi al-Qur'an: Studi Kritis atas Tafsîr al-Jalâlain. Suhuf: Jurnal Kajian Al-Qur’an, 9(1): 79-104.

Mustaqim, A. 2012. Epistemologi Tafsir Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: LKiS Group.

Najib, Ahmad Bin Abdullah. 2009. Imam Al-Bukhari dan Ketokohannya dalam Bidang Tafsir: Satu Tinjauan. Jurnal KIAS, 5(1).

Osborne, L. 2024. Qur'anic Orality and Textual Epistemologies of the Humanities. ReOrient, 9(1): 114-130. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/48810916/

Purnama, Rizal Faturohman. 2020. "The Aesthetic Reception of the Quran in Instagram: Variations, Factors, and Religious Commodification." Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam, 21(02): 237-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v21i2.9528.

al-Qattân, M. n.d. Mabâhith fî Ulûmi Al-Qur'an. Beirut: Dâr 'Ilmi wa al-'Îmân.

al-Qurtubî. 2000. Al-Jâmi' li Ahkâm al-Qur'ân. Beirut: Dâr al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah.

Rohman, I. 2018. Tafsir Al-Qur'an bi al-Qur'an as a Distinctive Methodology. Proceedings of the International Conference on Qur'an and Hadith Studies (ICQHS 2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icqhs-17.2018.5.

Rohman, I. 2019. "Qur'anism" in Modern Qur'an Interpretation. In M. Sirry (Ed.), New Trends in Qur'anic Studies: Text, Context, and Interpretation. Columbus: Lockwood Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5913/2019181.

Rustom, M. 2018. What is Tafsir al-Qur'an bi'l-Qur'an. Journal of Scriptural Reasoning, 17(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.61335/1551-3432.1026.

Saeed, A. 2006. Interpreting the Qur'an: Towards a Contemporary Approach. London & New York: Routledge.

Saeed, A. 2014. Reading the Qur'an in the Twenty-first Century: A Contextualist Approach. London & New York: Routledge.

Saeed, Sumaira et al. 2021. Social Network Analysis of Hadith Narrators. Journal of King Saud University -- Computer and Information Sciences, 34(6): 3766-3774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.01.019.

Shihab, M. Q. 2015. Kaidah Tafsir. Ciputat: Lentera Hati.

Sirry, M. 2019. New Trends in Qur'anic Studies: Text, Context, and Interpretation. Columbus: Lockwood Press.

Sookhdeo, P. 2006. Issues of Interpreting the Koran and Hadith. Connections, 5(3): 57-82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26323255.

Stecker, R. 1995. Relativism about Interpretation. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 53(01): 14-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/431732.

Suyûfî, Ahmad. 2018. "Historical Foundations of Qur'anic Legal Theory." Arab Law Quarterly, 32(1): 70--92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-12314024.

al-Suyûtî, Jalal al-Din. 1993. al-Durr al-Manthûr fî Tafsîr bi al-Ma'thûr. Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr.

Syarifah, U. & Fahimah, S. 2020. Zaghlûl Râghib Muḥammad al-Najjâr's Methods and Principles of Scientific Exegesis: A Review of Tafsîr al-Âyât al-Kawniyyah fî al-Qur'ân al-Karîm. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam, 21(02): 289-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v21i2.10227.

Syarifuddin, M. A., & Azizy, J. 2018. Thematic Scientific Interpretation of the Qur'an in Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Qur'an and Hadith Studies (ICQHS 2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icqhs-17.2018.7.

Taufik, Ahmad. et al. 2025. Countering Radicalism through Tafsir: State and Jihad in Indonesia's Thematic Quranic Interpretation. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam, 26(01): 143-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v26i1.32141.

Wendry, Novizal. et al. 2020. Kufan Hadith Transmitters and Geopolitics in Early Period of Islam. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam, 21(02): 213-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v21i2.10430.

Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. 2002. "The Authority of the Text and the Role of the Interpreter." International Journal of Middle East Studies, 34(01): 65-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743802001042.

al-Zarkashî, Badr al-Din Muhammad bin ‘Abdullah. 1957. Al-Burhân fî 'Ulûm al-Qur'ân. Cairo: Dâr Ihyâ' al-Kutub al-'Arabiyyah.

al-Zarqânî, M. 'Abd al-'Azîm. n.d. Manâhil al-'Irfân fî 'Ulûm al-Qur'ân. Matb'ah 'Isa al-Babi.

Zayd, Nasr Hâmid Abu Zayd. 1994. Mafhûm al-Nass: Dirâsah fî 'Ulûm al-Qur'ân. Beirut: Al-Markaz al-Thaqâfî al-'Arabî.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v26i2.37060

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Tools:

image host  image hostimage host image host

Indexed By:

image host image host image hostimage hostimage hostimage hostimage host image host

All publication by Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam, P-ISSN : 1858-4349, E-ISSN : 2442-5249