THE FARTHEST MOSQUE OR THE ALLEGED TEMPLE AN ANALYTIC STUDY

Yehia Hassan Wazeri

Abstract


Abstract

The Farthest Mosque (Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa in Jerusalem) has been associated in the consciousness of the Muslims, with The Sacred Mosque (Al-Masjid Al-Haram in Makkah) through a spiritual bond since the event of Isra’ (Night Journey) and Mi`raj (Ascension to Heaven). The objective of this study is to determine the orientation of the Farthest Mosque and illustrate the similarity in geometric shape (plan) and proportions, between the Farthest Mosque in Jerusalem and the sacred mosque (Al-Ka`bah) in Makkah, in the first part of the research. The second part of the research involves a study of some texts from the Old Testament that address the architectural and structural descriptions of the alleged temple, with the purpose of exposing whether glaring contradictions exist between the texts of the Old Testament themselves or between them and the real architectural and structural facts acknowledged by specialists in this field.

Keywords: The Farthest mosque, the Alleged Temple, Al-Ka`bah, geometric similarity

 

 

Abstrak

Masjid tertua (Masjid al-Aqsa di Jarusalem) telah dihubungkan dalam kesadaran umat muslim, dengan masjid suci (Masjidil Haram di Mekah) melalui ikatan spiritual sejak kejadian Isra’ (perjalanan malam) dan Mi’raj (kenaikan  ke  surga).  Tujuan  dari  kajian  ini  adalah  untuk  menentukan  orientasi  masjid  tertua  and menggambarkan kesamaan bentuk geometri (denah) dan proporsi, antara masjid tertua di Jarusalem dan masjid suci (Ka’bah) di Mekah, di bagian pertama penelitian. Bagian kedua penelitian melibatkan kajian beberapa tulisan dari surat wasiat kuno yang mengarah kepada deskripsi arsitektural dan struktural kuil, dengan tujuan mengekspos baik kontradiksi yang mencolok antara tulisan surat wasiat kuno itu sendiri maupun di antara mereka, dan fakta arsitektural dan struktural yang nyata diakui oleh spesialis di lapangan

 

Kata kunci: masjid tertua, kuil, ka’bah, kesamaan geometri


Keywords


The Farthest mosque; the Alleged Temple; Al-Ka`bah; geometric similarity

Full Text:

PDF

References


`A. Zayid. 2000. Al-Quds Al-Khalidah [Eternal

Jerusalem]. Cairo: Egyptian's History series

(197), General Egyptian Book Organization. pp.

M.`Abdul-Qadir. 2001. Watha'iq Al-Yahud As-

Sirriyyah Lil-Istila' `ala Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa

[Jewish Secret Documents to Usurp Al-Masjid

Al-Aqsa]. Alexandria, Egypt: its author, pp. 11.

`A. Zayid, ibid, pp. 181.

Y. Wazeri. 2005. At-Tatawwur Al-`Umrani wat-

Turath Al-Mi`mari li-Madinat Al-Quds Ash-

Sharif [Constructional Development and

Architectural Heritage of the Noble

Jerusalem]. Cairo: Ad-Dar Ath-Thaqafiyyah for

publication. pp. 127.

Dr. Hassan Zhazha mentioned that the area of

Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa is rectangular in shape being

oriented from north to south towards the

Qiblah in Makkah Al-Mukarramah, but he did

not support this claim with proof. See H.

Zhazha. 1973. Israel Rakizat Al-Isti`mar waal-

`idwan Baina AL-Muslimin [Israel; the

Cornerstone of Colonialism and Enmity among

the Muslims]. Cairo: Islamic Research

Magazine. pp. 116- 117.

http:// www.qiblalacator.com (Accessed

February 9, 2012).

`A. Zayid, ibid, pp. 125.

W. F. Albright. 1971. Athar Filistin [Monuments

of Palestine]. Arab Republic of Egypt: Supreme

Council for Islamic Affairs. pp. 31.

F. K. Tashkandi. 1999. ‘Ash-Shawahid min Ash-

Shari`ah wal-`Imarah fi Ihtida' Al-Muslimin ila

Al-Qiblah Al-Ula’. Architecture of the mosque

Symposium (7th vol.). Kingdom of Saudi Arabia:

College of Architecture and Planning, King Saud

University. pp. 73-121.

http://www.ritmeyer.com/2011/03/08/

mughrabi-gate-bridge-is-back-on-theagenda/

(Accessed June 10, 2012).

`A. Al-`Arif. 1999. Tarikh Al-Quds [History of

Jerusalem] 3rd ed. Cairo: Dar Al- Ma'arif. pp.

A. Zaki and M. S. Al-Junaydi. 1943. Al-Mabadi'

Al-Handasiyyah [Geometric Principles]. Cairo:

Ministry of Al-Ma`arif Al-`Umumiyyah. pp. 107.

`I. El-Said & A. Parman. 1976. Geometric

Concepts in Islamic Art. London: World of

Islamic Festival Publishing Company Ltd. pp.82.

M. Talu. 1982. Al-Funun Az-Zukhrufiyyah

[Decorative Arts]. Damascus: Dar Dimashq lit-

Tiba`ah wan-Nashr [Damascus House for

Printing and Publishing. pp. 29.

Y. Wazeri. 2007. Al-Ka`bah Al-Musharrafah;

Dirasah Tahliliyyah Lil-Khasa'is At-Tasmimiyyah

[The Honorable Ka`bah; an analytical study of

the characteristics of the design. Cairo: Inter

Build Conference Research Register 14

K. Creswell. 1984. Early Muslim Architecture. 1st

ed. Damascus: Dar Qutaybah. pp.13.

A. Al-Azraqi. 1985. Akhbar Makkah wa ma Ja'a

fiha min Al-Athar [News of Makkah] (2nd ed.).

Beirut: Rushdi Salih Mulhin. pp.64.

The current measurements of the Ka`bah are as

follows: The north-east side: 11.68 m, the

north-west side: 9 m, the south-west side:

04 m, and the south-east side: 10.18 m. See:

Y. `A. `Abdur-Rahim. 1998. "Al-Qissah Al-

Kamila Li-Bina' Bayt Allah Al-Haram [The

complete story for building the Sacred

mosque]”. `Ammar Magazin, issue no.19,

Kuwait, pp.23- 60.

A. R. Muhammad. 2000. Al-Masjid Al-Haram bi-

Makkah Al-Mukarramah [The sacred mosque in

Honorable Makkah] . 2nd ed. Cairo: Ad-Dar Al-

Misriyyah Al-Lubnaniyyah. pp. 24.

Some people drew my attention to the point

that Dr. Haytham ar-Ratrut pointed out that

there is a parallel between the angles of the

Honorable Ka`bah and those of Al-Masjid

Al-Aqsa. So, after referring to his study, I

noticed that he did not assume any comparison

between the real shape of the Honorable

Ka`bah and Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa in maintaining

this proposition. Rather, he drew on the inverse shape, making the Yemini Corner in the place of

the Black Stone Corner, without indicating the

reason for that. However, it is well-known that

geometric comparisons should apply to real and

actual shapes of buildings. See:nH. Ar-Ratrut.

"Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa fil-Athar Al-

Qur'aniyyah" [The Farthest mosque in the

Qur'anic Archeology]. Journal of Bayt Al-Maqdis

(Islamic Jerusalem Studies). United Kingdom.

no.1. pp.1-32.

According to the Jews, David (Dawud) and

Solomon (Sulayman) are kings and not

prophets, while in our Muslim creed, they are

two prophets sent by Allah (Exalted be He).

See for instance: R. Najm .2004. Al-Madkhal

Lil-Madinah Al-Muqaddasa [Entry into the

Sacred City]. Amman: The General

International Islamic Conference of Jerusalem,

pp. 83.

For more information on Qur'anic verses and

authentic prophetic Hadiths that confirm this

fact, the reader can refer to: `I. Al-Qaddumi.

Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa, Al-Haqiqah wat-Tarikh

[The Farthest mosque, Fact and History].

nded. Hawli, Kuwait: Jerusalem Center for

Documentary Studies. pp. 10 & 14.

Many studies have touched on the contradictions

and distortion in the Bible. See, for instance: N.

`A. As-Samirra'i. 2003. At-Tawrah bayna Fuqdan

Al-Asl wa Tanaqud An-Nass The Torah between

loss of the Original and Contradictions of the

Text], 2nd ed. London: Dar Al-Hikmah. Other

researches also elaborated on refuting claims of

the presence of the alleged temple in general.

See: S. H. Ar-Riqib. 2002. "Naqd Al-Maza`im As-

Suhyuniyyah fi Haykal Sulayman [Refuting the

Zionist Allegations on Solomon's Temple]".

Islamic University Magazine. Vol. 10, 1st issue,

Gaza: Faculty of Usul Ad-Din, pp. 41 – 91.

`A. Al-Misiri. 1999. Mawsu`at Al-Yahud wa Al-

Yahudiyyah wa As-Suhyuniyyah. Vol. 4. Cairo:

Dar Al-Shuruq.

See also the description of the alleged temple

in: http://www.templeinstitute.org (Accessed

May 11, 2012).

See New International Version of the Bible in:

http:// www.biblegateway.com (Accessed May

, 2012).

ibid

ibid

ibid

ibid

http://

www.kingsolomonsastonishingtemplesecrets.or

g (Accessed May 5, 2012).

ibid

The English-Hebrew version of the Bible in:

http:// www.mechon:nmare.org (Accessed May

, 2012).

King James version of the Bible, Ibid.

ibid

The English-Hebrew version of the Bible in:

http:// www.mechon:nmare.org (Accessed May

, 2012).

ibid

ibid

ibid

`A. Mustafa. 2006. Qadiyyat Al-Quds (The

Jerusalem Issue). Cairo: the Supreme Council

for Islamic Affairs, Egyptian Ministry of

Endowments. pp.49.

For more details, see: J. Al-`Ayyash. 2007.

Ha'it Al-Buraq [Al-Buraq Wall]. Cyprus:

Jerusalem Center for Documentary Studies.

M. M. Iskandar. 1972. Al-Quds wa Bayt Lahm

[Jerusalem and Bethlehem] (New and enlarged

edition). Cairo: Maktabat Al-Mahabbah. pp. 70.

–. 1970. The Holy Book. Cairo: The Holy Book

House,.

The English-Hebrew version of the Bible, Ibid.

For more details, see: B. Al-`Abid. 2001. “Al-

Huwiyyah Al-Mi`mariyyah wa Atharuha fi

Tahdid Al-Huwiyyah As-Siyasiyyah li Madinat Al-

Quds [Architectural Identity and its Impact in

Shaping the Political Identity of Jerusalem]”.

Journal of the Association of Arab Universities

for Studies and Research Engineering. Iraq:

College of Engineering, Bagdad Univ. pp. 1-70.

http://www.palestineinfo.

com/arabic/alquds/mukhtarat/dr_alabed/

f7.htm (Accessed May 14, 2012).

New International Version of the Bible, ibid.

Kings James, English version, ibid




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/jia.v2i3.2462

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



EDITORIAL OFFICE

Department of Architecture, Faculty of Science and Technology
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Phone (+62) 341 558933,Facsimile (+62) 341 558933
e-mail: journal.islamicarchitecture@gmail.com / jia@uin-malang.ac.id

 

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.