Innovative Work Behavior in Public Sector HRM: Perceived Corruption, Unethical Behavior, and Love of Money

Ikhsan Maksum, Daniyatul Farhiya, Aprillita Dian Wanodya, Noermijati Noermijati

Abstract


This study analyses the impact of perception of corruption and unethical behaviour on innovative work behaviour of civil servants, with the material orientation factor (love of money) as a mediator. Using a quantitative approach and cross-sectional survey design, empirical data were collected from 140 government employees. Data were analyzed by Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Results of the study showed the impact of corruption and unethical behaviours on innovative work behaviour was significant, whether directly or indirectly. Love of money was found to be an important mediating variable, which explained the indirect impact of corruption on workplace innovative behaviours. The results indicated that ethical work culture and organizational integrity, along with financial motivation (love of money) played critical roles in shaping employees' innovations within the government. Finally, the results of the study enrich the body of knowledge of public sector human resource management and offer recommendations to the end users on practical steps to promote an ethical, innovative and productive work culture in the public service.

Keywords


Perceived Corruption; Unethical Behavior; Love of Money; Innovative Work Behavior; Government Employees

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, M., Karimi, A., & Shafique, M. (2023). Cultivating innovative work behavior: The critical role of leadership support and psychological safety in public organizations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(4), 1012–1031. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2023-0145

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2021). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 171, 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04524-4

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.

Choi, I. (2020). Exploring the existence of innovative work behavior among government employees: Have they been there? Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 10(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v10i2.17124

Ciziceno, M., & Travaglino, G. A. (2019). Perceived Corruption and Individuals’ Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Institutional Trust. Social Indicators Research, 141(2), 685–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1850-2

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x

Ditta, S. (2023). The effect of public service motivation and love of money on employee innovative work behavior. Jurnal Pajak dan Keuangan Negara, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.31092/jpkn.v4i2.2030

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial Least Squares: Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0 untuk Penelitian Empiris. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2021). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2020). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. In European Business Review (Vol. 31, Number 1, pp. 2–24). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: The ethical virtue model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(7), 923–947. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.520

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101

Kurniawan, D. T., Kusnayain, Y. I., Aulisaina, F. I., Arif, M., & Hakim, R. (2021). Exploring the existance of innovative work behavior among government employee: have been there? In Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business (Vol. 36, Number 3). http://journal.ugm.ac.id/jieb

Lasthuizen, K., Huberts, L., & Heres, L. (2011). How to measure integrity violations: Towards a validated typology of unethical behavior. Public Management Review, 13(3), 383-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.553267

Maksum, I., & Ningtyas, M. N. (2022). The dark side of perceived corruption: Mediating mechanism between love of money and evil behavior. Diponegoro International Journal of Business, 5(1), 12–23. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/ijb/article/view/13636

Nazaruddin, I., Rezki, S. B., & Rahmanda, Y. (2018). Love of money, gender, religiosity: The impact on ethical perceptions of future professional accountants. Business and Economic Horizons, 14(2), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.285190

Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2021). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 31(3), 100762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100762

OECD. (2020). OECD Public Integrity Handbook. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ac8ed8e8-en

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Rahman, F. (2020). The relationships among love of money and unethical behaviour. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 2(3), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.20885/jca.vol2.iss3.art3

Saeed, I., Khan, J., Zada, M., Zada, S., & Jun, Z. Y. (2022). Employees' moral commitment and effectiveness in implementing zero-tolerance policies against corruption: The role of ethical climate. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 891044. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891044

Srirahayu, D. P., Ekowati, D., & Sridadi, A. R. (2023). Innovative work behavior in public organizations: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 9(2), e13557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13557

Susanto, E. (2020). Does love of money matter for innovative work behavior in public sector organizations? Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2020-0028

Tang, T. L. P., & Chen, Y. J. (2008). Intelligence vs. wisdom: The love of money, machiavellianism, and unethical behavior across college major and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9559-1

Tang, T. L. P., & Chiu, R. K. (2003). Income, money ethic, pay satisfaction, commitment, and unethical behavior: Is the love of money the root of evil for Hong Kong employees? Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024731611490

Tang, T. L. P., et al. (2018). Monetary Intelligence and Behavioral Economics: The Enron Effect—Love of Money, Corporate Ethical Values, Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), and Dishonesty Across 31 Geopolitical Entities. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(4), 919–937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2942-4

Transparency International. (2024). Corruption Perceptions Index 2024. Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi

Tran, T. B. H., Nguyen, T. H., & Dang, C. N. (2022). Human resource management and innovation performance in public sector organizations: Evidence from Vietnam. Public Organization Review, 22, 345–362. https://link.springer.com/journal/11115

Triwibowo, S. (2019). Public Financial Management And Corruption In Indonesia: A Panel Cointegration And Causality Analysis. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 34(3), 267–279. http://journal.ugm.ac.id/jieb

Usman, M., Ghani, U., Islam, Z. U., Gul, H., & Mahmood, K. (2022). Ambidextrous leadership and innovative work behaviors: Workplace thriving as a mediator. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(4), e2321. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2321

Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392857

World Bank. (2024). Worldwide Governance Indicators. World Bank. https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/

Wynen, J., Benders, J. , & van Bijsterveld, M. (2019). Human resource practices and innovation in public organizations: A systematic review. Public Management Review, 21(4), 536–556.

Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/iq.v22i2.43732



Editorial Office:
Management Department,
Faculty of Economics,
State Islamic University of Maulana Malik Ibrahim
Gajayana Str. No. 50 Phone. 082334248882
E-mail: iqtishoduna@uin-malang.ac.id

E-ISSN 2614-3437
P-ISSN 1829-524X

Lisensi Creative Commons
IQTISHODUNA under CC BY SA 4.0 Internasional. Indexed by: