Integrating the scientific approach in STEM-Based learning: advancing critical and creative mathematical thinking skills for future-oriented education

Dwi Yulianto

Abstract


Although STEM education has been proven to enhance scientific literacy, its effectiveness in developing pre-service mathematics teachers’ critical and creative thinking skills remains underexplored. Furthermore, comparative studies on STEM-based scientific learning versus conventional methods in fostering Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) remain limited, particularly in the context of future-oriented education. This study aims to analyze the impact of STEM-based scientific learning on the critical and creative thinking skills of pre-service mathematics teachers and compare its effectiveness with conventional instruction. A quasi-experimental posttest-only nonequivalent control group design was employed. A total of 52 students were selected through purposive sampling and divided into an experimental group (n=26, STEM-based scientific learning) and a control group (n=26, conventional learning). Critical thinking was assessed using WGCTA, while creative thinking was measured through TTCT, project analysis, and student engagement observations. The MANOVA results confirm that STEM-based scientific learning is significantly more effective than conventional methods, leading to notable improvements in critical and creative thinking skills. Additionally, the experimental group demonstrated more stable performance, as indicated by a lower standard deviation compared to the control group. These findings underscore that integrating STEM-based scientific learning contributes significantly to strengthening HOTS among pre-service mathematics teachers, serving as a valuable reference for curriculum development in future-oriented education.

Keywords


STEM, scientific approach, HOTS, critical thinking, mathematical creative thinking.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A’yun, Q. ., Rusilowati, A. ., & Lisdiana, L. (2020). Improving students’ critical thinking skills through the STEM digital book. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(2), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v8i3.35260


Acomi, N. ., Acomi, O. ., Akceviz Ova, N. ., Akilli, A. ., Anlar, E. ., Arevalo Martinez, H. ., Arisoy, P. ., Necmeddin;, Mehmet;, D., Koca, İ. ., Kurt, H. ., Marzano, F. ., Nur Akarcay, Y. ., Ochoa Siguencia, L. ., Pellegrino, A. ., Yucel, Ö. ., & Zorzi, S. (2023). Creativity and Arts in Digital Social Innovation. 1, 1–120. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8052835


Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). Stem vs. Steam education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331


Agung, A. A. G., Basilius Redan Werang, & Anak Agung Putri Sri. (2022). Project-Based E-Learning and Its Impact on Students’ Academic Achievement in Curriculum Development Lectures. Mimbar Ilmu, 27(3), 362–369. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v27i3.53855


Astawan, I. G., Suarjana, I. M., Werang, B. R., Asaloei, S. I., Sianturi, M., & Elele, E. C. (2023). Stem-Based Scientific Learning and Its Impact on Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Skills: an Empirical Study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(3), 482–492. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i3.46882


Ayebale, L., Habaasa, G., & Tweheyo, S. (2020). Factors affecting students’ achievement in mathematics in secondary schools in developing countries: A rapid systematic. Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 36(S1), S73–S76. https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-200713


Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombs, J. R. ., & Daniels, L. B. (2010). Conceptualizing critical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202799183133


Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2021). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2919–2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943


Bilad, M. R., Zubaidah, S., & Prayogi, S. (2024). Addressing the PISA 2022 Results: A Call for Reinvigorating Indonesia’s Education System. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v3i1.1935


Bron, J. F., & Prudente, M. S. (2024). Examining the Effect of Problem-Based Learning Approach on Learners` Mathematical Creativity: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 10(3), 653–668. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3456


Budikusuma, S. N., Usodo, B., Nurhasanah, F., & Hendriyanto, A. (2024). Education for sustainable development (ESD) in mathematics education. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 8213– 8226. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5437


Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206


Cao Thi, H., Le, T. A., Tran Ngoc, B., & Phan Thi Phuong, T. (2023). Factors affecting the numeracy skills of students from mountainous ethnic minority regions in Vietnam: Learners’ perspectives. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2202121


Cherry, R. (2022). How the experimental method works in psychology. Verywell Mind.


Clements, D. H. ., Vinh, M. ., Lim, C. I. ., & Sarama, J. (2020). STEM for Inclusive Excellence and Equity. Early Education and Development, 32(1), 148–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1755776


Desnita, D., Festiyed, F., Novitra, F., Ardiva, A., & Navis, M. Y. (2022). The Effectiveness of CTL-based Physics E-module on the Improvement of the Creative and Critical Thinking Skills of Senior High School Students. TEM Journal, 11(2), 802–810. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM112-38


Diana, Surjono, H. D., & Mahmudi, A. (2023). The Effect of Flipped Classroom Learning Model on Students’ Understanding of Mathematical Concepts and Higher-Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(12), 2014–2022. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.12.2016


Dilekçi, Atilla;Karatay, H. (2023). The effects of the 21st century skills curriculum on the development of students’ creative thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101229


Doyan, A., Melita, A. S., & Makhrus, M. (2023). Increasing Critical Thinking Skills Through the Development of STEM-Based Physics Learning Media on Temperature and Heat. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 4096–4102. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3724


Duran, M., & Sendag, S. (2012). A Preliminary Investigation into Critical Thinking Skills of Urban High School Students: Role of an IT/STEM Program. Creative Education, 03(02), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.32038


Flores, E., Xu, X., & Lu, Y. (2020). Human Capital 4.0: a workforce competence typology for Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 31(4), 687-703. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2019-0309


Goos, M., Carreira, S., & Namukasa, I. K. (2023). Mathematics and interdisciplinary STEM education: recent developments and future directions. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(7), 1199–1217. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1301558.pdf
Gube, M., & Lajoie, S. (2020). Adaptive expertise and creative thinking: A synthetic review and implications for practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, Article 100630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100630


Hacioglu, Y. & Gulhan, F. (2021). The effects of STEM education on the students’ critical thinking skills and STEM perceptions. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 7(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.771331


Hitchcock, D. (2017). Critical Thinking as an Educational Ideal. In: On Reasoning and Argument. Argumentation Library, 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_30


Hoo, C. D., & Yeak, S. H. (2024). The Empowering Innovative Mathematics Curriculum and Industry Collaboration in Gearing Malaysia for IR4.0 Era. ASM Science Journal, 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.32802/ASMSCJ.2023.1020


Ilma, A. Z., Wilujeng, I., Widowati, A., Nurtanto, M., & Kholifah, N. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review of STEM Education in Indonesia (2016-2021): Contribution to Improving Skills in 21st Century Learning. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 13(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.02.17


Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Roberts, T., Yost, C., & Fowler, A. (2021). Equity-Oriented Conceptual Framework for K-12 STEM literacy. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00294-z


Just, J., & Siller, H. S. (2022). The Role of Mathematics in STEM Secondary Classrooms: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090629


Kayan-Fadlelmula, F., Sellami, A., Abdelkader, N., & Umer, S. (2022). A systematic review of STEM education research in the GCC countries: trends, gaps and barriers. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00319-7


Khasanah, U., & Hidayah, I. (2022). Meta analysis of learning models in improving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in junior highs school mathematics learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v11i1.55859


Kholid, M. N., Mahmudah, M. H., Ishartono, N., Putra, F. G., & Forthmann, B. (2024). Classification of students’ creative thinking for non-routine mathematical problems. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2394738


Khotimah, R. P., Adnan, M., Che Ahmad, C. N., & Murtiyasa, B. (2023). The effectiveness of the STEMDISLEARN module in improving students’ critical thinking skills in the differential equations course. Cogent Education, 10(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2220233


Krishnan, P. (2019). A review of the non-equivalent control group post-test-only design. Nurse researcher, 26(2), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1582


Litina, S., & Rubene, Z. (2024). The Effect of Digital School Culture on Science Education and Scientific Literacy: A Scoping Review. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 15(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.1.41.55


Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2017). An A – Z of Applied Linguistics Research Methods. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-40322-3


Martín-Cudero, D., Cid-Cid, A. I., & Guede-Cid, R. (2024). Analysis of Mathematics Education From a Steam Approach At Secondary and Pre-Universitary Educational Levels: a Systematic Review. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(2), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2349


Mater, N. R., Haj Hussein, M. J., Salha, S. H., Draidi, F. R., Shaqour, A. Z., Qatanani, N., & Affouneh, S. (2020). The effect of the integration of STEM on critical thinking and technology acceptance model. Educational Studies, 48(5), 642–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1793736


Nilimaa, J. (2023). New Examination Approach for Real-World Creativity and Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics. Trends in Higher Education, 2(3), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu2030028


Nufus, H., Muhandaz, R., Hasanuddin, Nurdin, E., Ariawan, R., Fineldi, R. J., Hayati, I. R., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2024). Analyzing the students’ mathematical creative thinking ability in terms of self-regulated learning: How do we find what we are looking for? Heliyon, 10(3), e24871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24871


Octafianellis, D. ., Sudarmin, S. ., Wijayanti, N. ., & Panca, H. (2021). Analysis of student’s critical thinking skills and creativity after problem-based learning with STEM integration. Journal of Science Education Research, 5(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v5i1.41750


Parno, Supriana, E., Widarti, A. N., & Ali, M. (2021). The effectiveness of STEM approach on students’ critical thinking ability in the topic of fluid statics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012150


Pasaribu, K., Khairuna, K., Adlini, M. N., & Abrori, F. M. (2023). Developing STEM students’ worksheet to improve students’ creative thinking ability. Research and Development in Education (RaDEn), 3(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v3i2.25331


Poszytek, P. (2021). The landscape of scientific discussions on the competencies 4.0 concept in the context of the 4th industrial revolution— a bibliometric review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(12), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126709


Prahmana, R. C. I., Sagita, L., Hidayat, W., & Utami, N. W. (2020). Two Decades of Realistic Mathematics Education Research in Indonesia: a Survey. Infinity Journal, 9(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p223-246


Pramasdyahsari, A. S., Setyawati, R. D., Aini, S. N., Nusuki, U., Arum, J. P., Astutik, L. D., Widodo, W., Zuliah, N., & Salmah, U. (2023). Fostering students’ mathematical critical thinking skills on number patterns through digital book STEM PjBL. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13342


S.Bell. (2009). Experimental Design. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780080449104004314

Saidin, N. D., Khalid, F., Martin, R., Kuppusamy, Y., & Munusamy, N. A. P. (2021). Benefits and challenges of applying computational thinking in education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(5), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.5.1519


Shadiq, F. (2019). Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal 2019, Vol. 9, No. 1. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 9(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v9i1.73


Sirajudin, N., Suratno, J., & Pamuti. (2020). Developing creativity through STEM education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012211


Suciu, T. (2014). The Importance of Creativity in Education. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series V: Economic Sciences, 152-158. https://webbut.unitbv.ro/index.php/Series_V/article/view/4955


Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019.


Suryawan, I. P. P., Sudiarta, I. G. P., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2023). Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Solving Mathematical Problems: Systematic Literature Review. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 6(1), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i1.56462


Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(23), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113


Tanner, K. (2018). Research methods: Information, systems, and context. Chandos Publishing.


Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Mumu, J. (2021). Mathematics Instruction to Promote Mathematics Higher-Order Thinking Skills of Students in Indonesia: Moving Forward. TEM Journal, 10(4), 1945–1954. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM104-60


Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3):54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054.


Wang, X. S., Perry, L. B., Malpique, A., & Ide, T. (2023). Factors predicting mathematics achievement in PISA: a systematic review. Large-scale Assess Educ 11, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00174-8


Werang, B. R., Agung, A., Agung, G., Jampel, I. N., Wayan, I., & Asaloei, S. I. (2023). Exploring the outside-the-box leadership of an Indonesian school principal : A qualitative case study. Cogent Education, 10(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2255091


Widyawati, A. ., Suyanta;, Kuswanto, H. ., Suyanto, S., & Zhanbyrbaevna, T. M. (2024). STEM Learning Model’s Impact on Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills and Motivation: A Literature Review. International Journal of Religion, 5(3), 200–204. https://doi.org/10.61707/kc4x8954


Zhou, S.-N., Liu, Q., Koenig, K., Xiao, Q. L., & Bao, L. (2021). Analysis of Two-Tier Question Scoring Methods : a Case Study on the Lawson ’ S Classroom Test. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(1), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.146


Zubair, A. M. (2022). Experimental research: Design - types and process. 220–228. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.16.3.1152




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ijtlm.v9i2.32591

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2025 Dwi Yulianto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed by :