THE STUDENT’S ABILITY TO WRITE A GOOD PARAGRAPH THROUGH DISCUSSION AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 1 PAKEL TULUNGAGUNG

Suparmo Suparmo

Abstract


As members of society, we are necessarily trained in writing activities, at least in creating sentences to good paragraphs. However, there are reasons how to read is not enough, and we are also interested in how to write sentences very well (Zamel, 1987: 257). Writing a good paragraph is a complex process that has been done and not easy for everyone. From four language skills, writing a composition is considered as a subject that is difficult to master.  Mastery of writing is not a skill which can be learned in isolation. It means that writing is integrated by the other language skills such as reading, speaking, and listening, (Richard & Rodger (1999:56). The usage of acceptable technique is essential in teaching-learning process because it motivates the students to learn English. Therefore, the writer provides a research question on whether the students have created their composition easily through a peer-to-peer discussion. In this case, the writer needs to observe whether there are different results of composing a paragraph through a peer-to-peer discussion compared with the other groups. The objectives of the study are whether students using the discussion to write a good paragraph gain better scores in English than those who do not. The writer collects the data from the students of the second year. They were asked to write a paragraph based on specific topics provided by a classroom teacher and choose three alternative topics to write quickly. The first process was that the students were trained to write a paragraph in a group. Next, in the final activity, they create a composition. The result of research about making composition through a discussion way is right. They can share each other to correct the mistakes. With the result of the discussion, the students can create the composition better the next day. The research concludes that making composition through a discussion way is one of the solutions to make composition easier for the students. Based on the result of research, the students enjoy writing a paragraph through discussion way.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Byrne, D. (1990). Writing Through some methods in teaching learning activities, Cambridge University Press.

Cowan, E. (1981). Writing through Discussion Way. Cambridge University Press.

Cowan, E. (1983). The Way of Teaching Writing. Ms Graw Hll International Book Company.

Framklin. V. (2002). Research Method on Language Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Fromklin, V. (2002). Writing Academic English. London: Addison-Wisley Publishing Company.

Levin, G. (1983). Short Essays, Model for Composition. New York: Harcout Brace Jowanovish, Inc.

Oshima, H. (1983). Writing with A Purpose. New York: Hoghton Mifflin Company.

Ozick, C. (1986). Teaching Writing. New York: Mc Graw Hill International Book Company.

Richard & Rodger. (1999). Teaching writing based on a discussion way. International Journal of HSS.

Rodman, Robert & Fromkin, V. (1983). An Introduction to Language. Japan: CNS College, Publishing, Holt, Richard and Winston.

Zamel. (1987). How to write a good paragraph. Cambridge University Press.

Zamel. (1987). Writing Task, An Authentic-Task Approach to Individual Writing Needs. Britain: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/jeasp.v2i1.7260

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

image host image hostimage hostimage hostDESKRIPSI GAMBARimage host

 

Editorial Office:
Pusat Pengembangan Bahasa
Program Khusus Pengembangan Bahasa Inggris (PKPBI)
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gedung C lantai 1
Jl. Gajayana No 50 Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Kode Pos 65144, Telp/Fax : (0341) 570872
Email: jeasp@uin-malang.ac.id

 

image host

JEASP : Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International