Mapping the Evolution of Quiet Quitting Research: A Five-Year Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis

Dwiky Rahardian, Imam Yuadi

Abstract


Quiet quitting has emerged as a significant phenomenon in modern workplace dynamics, reflecting employee disengagement and dissatisfaction with organizational structures. This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of quiet quitting research over the past five years, utilizing data from the Scopus database and Orange Data Mining for analysis. The findings reveal key themes such as employee engagement, organizational culture, burnout, leadership, and workplace dynamics. The surge in publications related to remote and hybrid work during the period of the pandemic reflects a paradigm shift in academic literature towards the normalization of such work practices. Identifies five key thematic clusters, finding that Quiet Quitting and Organizational Structures and Employee Engagement and Workplace Analysis to be key themes. The insights underscore the need for a multidimensional approach, with implications for how organizations can foster more engaged workplaces by emphasizing supportive policies, kind and engaged leadership, and fairness in task allocation to mitigate the risk of quiet quitting. This study contributes to the literature through a new examination of research patterns to a qualitative research topic that utilized empirical methods drawing on a data-driven investigation highlighting pathways for which both researchers/academics and practitioners might consider exploring going forward.

Keywords


Employee Engagement; Organizational Culture; Quiet Quitting; Workplace Analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arzuaga, S., Gandolfi, F., & Johnston, T. (2023). Quiet Quitting: Work Affect in the Post-Pandemic Workplace. 13(5).

Benítez-Márquez, M. D., Sánchez-Teba, E. M., Bermúdez-González, G., & Núñez-Rydman, E. S. (2022). Generation Z Within the Workforce and in the Workplace: A Bibliometric Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 736820. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736820

Cauthen, K., Rai, P., Hale, N., Freeman, L., & Ray, J. (2022). Detecting technological maturity from bibliometric patterns. Expert Systems with Applications, 201, 117177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117177

Fuchs, K. (2023). A Systematic Guide for Conducting Thematic Analysis in Qualitative Tourism Research. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 14(6), 2696. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v14.6(70).17

Gabelaia, I., & Bagociunaite, R. (2024). The Impact of “Quiet Quitting” on Overall Organizational Behavior and Culture. In I. Kabashkin, I. Yatskiv, & O. Prentkovskis (Eds.), Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication (Vol. 913, pp. 366–378). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53598-7_33

Hagg, L. J., Merkouris, S. S., O’Dea, G. A., Francis, L. M., Greenwood, C. J., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Westrupp, E. M., Macdonald, J. A., & Youssef, G. J. (2022). Examining Analytic Practices in Latent Dirichlet Allocation Within Psychological Science: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(11), e33166. https://doi.org/10.2196/33166

Hezam, Y., Luong, H., & Anthonysamy, L. (2025). Machine learning in predicting firm performance: A systematic review. China Accounting and Finance Review, 27(3), 309–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAFR-03-2024-0036

Johnson, J. R. (2023). What’s New About Quiet Quitting (and What’s Not). The Transdisciplinary Journal of Management.

Kachhap, V., & Singh, T. (2024). Quiet quitting: A comprehensive exploration of hidden problems. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 38(5), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-10-2023-0214

Lee, D., Park, J., & Shin, Y. (2023). Where Are the Workers? From Great Resignation to Quiet Quitting (No. W30833; p. w30833). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w30833

Llinás, H., Gutiérrez, I., Torresblanca, A., De La Hoz, J., & Llinás, B. (2025). A Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis of the p-Adic Theory Literature Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Mathematics, 13(18), 2932. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13182932

Lu, M., Al Mamun, A., Chen, X., Yang, Q., & Masukujjaman, M. (2023). Quiet quitting during COVID-19: The role of psychological empowerment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 485. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02012-2

Mahand, T., & Caldwell, C. (2023). Quiet Quitting – Causes and Opportunities. Business and Management Research, 12(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v12n1p9

Pevec, N. (2024). The Concept of Identifying Factors of Quiet Quitting in Organizations: An Integrative Literature Review. Izzivi Prihodnosti, 8(2, May 2023). https://doi.org/10.37886/ip.2023.006

Romero, J. D., Feijoo-Garcia, M. A., Nanda, G., Newell, B., & Magana, A. J. (2024). Evaluating the Performance of Topic Modeling Techniques with Human Validation to Support Qualitative Analysis. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 8(10), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8100132

Samnani, A., & Robertson, K. (2025). More Than a Personal Decision: A Relational Theory of Quiet Quitting. Human Resource Management, 64(5), 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22314

Serenko, A. (2024). The human capital management perspective on quiet quitting: Recommendations for employees, managers, and national policymakers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2022-0792

Sitorus, M. G., & Rachmawati, R. (2024). Analysis of the Quiet Quitting Phenomenon with Work Engagement and Job Satisfaction as mediators, Study of Employees in Indonesia Banking Industry. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 4(11), 10671–10793. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i11.44765

Sonk, M., & Tunger, D. (2024). Trend mining with Orange – using topic modeling in futures research with the example of urban mobility. European Journal of Futures Research, 12(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-024-00229-1

Stankovic, M., & Slavkovic, M. (2025). Quality of Work Life Determinants of Healthcare Professionals’ Quiet Quitting: Towards Individual Difference. Healthcare, 13(13), 1547. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13131547

Stevens, K., Kegelmeyer, P., Andrzejewski, D., & Buttler, D. (2012). Exploring Topic Coherence over Many Models and Many Topics. Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, 952–961.

Taylor, R. M. C., & Du Preez, J. A. (2023). SimLDA: A Tool for Topic Model Evaluation. In K. Arai (Ed.), Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2022, Volume 3 (Vol. 561, pp. 534–554). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18344-7_38

Xueyun, Z., Al Mamun, A., Masukujjaman, M., Rahman, M. K., Gao, J., & Yang, Q. (2023). Modelling the significance of organizational conditions on quiet quitting intention among Gen Z workforce in an emerging economy. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 15438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42591-3




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/mec-j.v10i1.32318

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Editorial Office:
Faculty of Economics,
State Islamic University of Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gajayana Street 50, Malang-East Java, Indonesia 65144
Phone (+62) 341 558881, Facsimile (+62) 341 558881
e-mail: mecjournal@uin-malang.ac.id

 

 

P-ISSN 2599-3402
E-ISSN 2598-9537

Lisensi Creative Commons

MEC-J is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0)

 

MEC-J INDEXED IN:  

                        

SINTA

Member of:

 

View My Stats