Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the legal consequences of the death the capital manager (mudharib) in the mudharabah financing contract. The type of research used is normative juridical with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The sources of legal material in this study are from primary legal material and secondary legal material. The results of the analysis of this study are that when the capital manager dies in the mudharabah financing contract in Islamic banking, the agreement made between the capital owner and the capital manager ends automatically. The point is that the legal relationship between the capital owner and the capital manager has been broken up since then and has also resulted in the breaking up of rights and obligations among the parties that made the agreement. While all forms of risk in the mudharabah contract are borne by the owner of the capital, unless the capital manager is proven to have made a deliberate mistake, negligent or violated the agreement. Since the capital manager has died in the mudharabah financing contract, the capital owner may not sue his familys to pay the remaining payment from the financing because mudharabah is not a debt agreement. To restore the capital, the owner of the capital that has not been paid by the deceased capital manager is to sell his capital management business, or if the business is still running, the familys may continue the business of the deceased capital manager with the agreement of the capital owner.

Alfie, A. A. (2007). Analisis Kepatuhan Pembiayaan Mudharabah dalam Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK No. 59) terhadap Aspek Syariah Ilmu Fiqih Syafi’iyah. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Vol. 2, No. 3 , h. 36.

Antonio, S. (1999). Bank Syariah Wacana Ulama dan Cendikiawan. Jakarta: Tazkia Institute.

Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional Nomor 07/DSN/MUI/IV/2000 tentang Pembiayaan Mudharabah.

Ibrahim, M. A. (2002). Konsep profit and loss sharing system Menurut Empat Mazhab. Jakarta: P3EI UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Karim, A. A. (2004). Bank Islam: Analisis Fiqih dan Keuangan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.

Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (KHES). (2010). Bandung: Fokus Media.

Muhammad. (2005). Konstruksi Mudharabah dalam Bisnis Syariah: Mudharabah dalam Wacana Fiqih dan Praktik Ekonomi Modern. Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta.

Muhammad, D. W. (2011). Kajian tentang Pembiayaan Mudharabah pada Bank Syariah. Jurnal Media Hukum , h. 33.

Musjtari, D. N. (2016). Rekonstruksi Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Akad Pembiayaan Dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012. Jurnal Media Hukum, 63.

Musjtari, D. N. (2012). Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Praktik Perbankan Syariah. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Muslich, A. W. (2013). Fiqh Muamalat. Jakarta: Amzah.

Naf’an. (2014). Pembiayaan Musyarakah dan Mudharabah. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor: 9/19/PBI/2007 tentang Pelaksanaan Prinsip Syariah dalam Kegiatan Penghimpunan Dana dan Penyaluran Dana Serta Pelayanan Jasa Bank Syariah.

Rusyd, I. Bidayah al-Mujathid. Mesir: Dar Al-Fkir.

Saeed, A. (2004). Menyoal Bank Syariah: Kritik Atas Interpretasi Bunga Bank Kaum Neo-Revivalis. Jakarta: Paramadina.

Soekanto, S. d. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sudarsono, H. (2004). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Syariah Deskripsi dan Ilustrasi. Yogyakarta: Ekonosia.

Sumitro, W. (2004). Asas-Asas Perkembangan Islam & Lembaga-Lembaga Terkait. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2004 tentang Bank Indonesia.

Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah.

Yhu’nanda, M. A. (2014). Analisis Unsur Kesalahan dan Kelalaian Mudharib dalam Akad Pembiayaan Mudharabah Bermasalah Sebagai Dasar Eksekusi Jaminan. Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa FH UB , h.4.