Email this article 
Hide
Show all
ARGUMENT BAR MOVEMENT IN RELATIVE CLAUSES PRODUCED BY BIPA STUDENTS: AN ANALYSIS OF NOAM CHOMSKY’S GENERATIVE TRANSFORMATION
Abstract
This study was intended to describe (1) the characteristics of the argument bar movement in relative clauses, (2) the characteristics of the relative clause structure, and (3) the suitability of the relative clause structure produced by BIPA students. This research was a qualitative descriptive case study. This research data were relative clauses sourced from BIPA students' speeches at the beginner and intermediate levels at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang. The data collection method used was the listening method with tapping, recording, note-taking, and hidden fishing techniques. Data analysis was carried out by identifying the predication-argument relationship with theta theory, identifying the deep structure and surface structure, analyzing movement objectives, movement traces, and movement consequences by utilizing the subjacency condition theory. The results showed that the characteristics of the argument bar movement in the relative clauses generated by 92% of BIPA students were in the form of short movements and did not exceed one bounding node. Based on the Indonesian language rules, most of the relative clauses produced by BIPA students were appropriate (75%). It shows that BIPA students have fully understood the relative clause structure.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adani, F. (2011). Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: Towards a grammatically based account. Journal of Child Language, 38(1), 141.
Adityarini, Ida Ayu Putri., I Wayan Pastika, dan I Nyoman Sedeng. 2020. Interferensi Fonologi pada Pemelajar BIPA Asal Eropa di Bali. Aksara, 32(1), 167-180.
Agustina. (2009). Klausa Relatif: Perspektif Baru dalam Gramatika Deskriptif Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka Reka Cipta.
Arka, I Wayan. (2013) "On The Typology and Syntax of TAM in Indonesian." Tense, aspect, mood, and evidentiality in languages of Indonesia: 23-40.
Caponigro, I., Torrence, H., & Maldonado, R. Z. (Eds.). (2020). Headless relative clauses in Mesoamerican Languages. Oxford University Press.
Cole, P. & Hermon, G. 2005. Subject and non-subject Relativization in Indonesian. Journal of East Asian Linguistics (Online), 14:59-88,
Chomsky, N. 1988a. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris Publication.
Chomsky, N. 1988b. Some Concepts and Consequences of The Theory of Government and Binding. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 2000. New Horizons in The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coon, J., Pedro, P. M., & Preminger, O. (2014). The role of case in A-bar extraction asymmetries: Evidence from Mayan. Linguistic Variation, 14(2), 179-242. doi:10.1075/lv.14.2.01coo
DeCapua, A. 2008. Grammar for Teachers: A Guide to American English for Native and Non-Native Speakers. New York: Springer.
Dwijati, I. K., Pastika, I. W., & Puspani, I. A. M. (2016). Indonesian noun phrases with relative clauses and their translations in English found in the short story" Mati Sunyi. Journal of Language and Translation Studies, 2(4).
Ekaristianto, F. B. H., Purnanto, D., & Sumarlam, S. (2020). Construction of Relative Clause in Indonesian Language. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(1), 410-420.
Epps, P. (2012). Between headed and headless relative clauses. Relative Clauses in Languages of the Americas: A typological overview, 102, 191-211.
Ewing, M. C. dan Cumming, S.1988. Relative Clause in Indonesian Discourse: Face to Face and Cyberspace Interaction. Papers from The Fifth Annual Meeting of The Southeast Asian Linguistic Society, (Online), (sealang.net)
Fanselow, G., Schlesewsky, M., Vogel, R., & Weskott, T. (2011). Animacy effects on crossing wh-movement in German. Linguistics, 49(4), 657-683.
Fortin, C. (2018). On the left periphery in Indonesian. In Chung, Sandy, Daniel Finer, Ileana Paul, and Eric Potsdam (eds.). Proceedings of the Sixteenth Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (2009).
Friedmann, N. & Lavi, H. 2006. On The Order of Acquisition of A-Movement, Wh-Movement, and V-C Movement. Dalam A. Belletti, E. Bennatu, C. Chesi, E. D. Domenico, & I. Ferrari (Eds.), Language Acquisition and Development, (Online), 211-217
Friedmann, N., Aram, D., & Novogrodsky, R. (2011). Definitions as a window to the acquisition of relative clauses. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(4), 687.
Gennari, S.P.; Mirkovic, J.; & MacDonald, M.C. (2012). Animacy and Competition in Relative Clause Production: A Cross-Linguistic Investigation. Cognitive Psychology 65(2): 141-176.
Grillo, N., & Costa, J. (2014). A novel argument for the universality of parsing principles. Cognition, 133(1),156-187.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.019
Haegeman, L. (1991). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford & Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
Haegeman, L. 1994. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory Second Edition. Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
Irmawati, B., Shindo, Y., & Matsumoto, H. (2015). A dependency annotation scheme for Indonesian. In The 21 th Annual Meetings of the Association for Natural Language Processing.
Kaufman, Daniel. 2018. Austronesian Predication and The Emergence of Biclausal Clefts in Indonesian Languages. In Sonja Riesberg, Asako Shiohara, & Atsuko Utsumi (Eds.), Perspectives on Information Structure in Austronesian Languages, 207–245. Berlin: Language Science Press. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1402547
Kirjavainen, M., Kidd, E., & Lieven, E. (2017). How do language-specific characteristics affect the acquisition of different relative clause types? Evidence from Finnish. Journal of child language, 44(1), 120-157. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000768
Krause, E., & von Heusinger, K. (2019). Gradient effects of animacy on differential object marking in Turkish. Open Linguistics, 5(1), 171-190.
Kurnia, Z., FX Samingin, dan Asmara R. 2018. Interferensi Bahasa Jawa ke Dalam Pemakaian Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Sekolah Dasar Kecamatan Tlogomulyo, Kabupaten Temanggung. Repetisi, 28(2), 38-53
Kusdianty, S. R. (2016). The Analysis of Students’ Error in Using Relative clause. Indonesian EFL Journal, 2(1), 61-62.
Mak, W. M., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2002). The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of memory and language, 47(1), 50-68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2837
Novianto, W., & Suhandano, S. (2019). Production of Relative Clauses by English Learners in Kampung Inggris Pare Kediri. In English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings (Vol. 3, pp. 50-56).
Rizzi, L. (2006). On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ecp effects. In L. Cheng & N. Corver (Eds.), Wh-movement moving on (pp. 97-134). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press
Sari, A. M., Andayani, A., & Sumarlam, S. (2017). Penggunaan Klausa Relatif Pada Pembelajar Bipa di Unit Pelaksana Teknis (UPT) Bahasa Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta. Diglossia: Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesusastraan, 9(1), 45-64.
Suharsono, S. (2015). Pemerolehan Klausa Relatif pada Pemelajar Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing (BIPA): Kajian Bahasa-Antara. LITERA, 14(1).
Suzuki, T. (2011). A case-marking cue for filler–gap dependencies in children's relative clauses in Japanese. Journal of Child Language, 38(5), 1084-1095. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000910000553
Umiyati, Mirsa. 2016. Fungsi Predikatif Intransitif Adjektiva Bahasa Indonesia. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 2(1), 192-209 DOI: 10.22225/jr.2.1.359.192-209
Yanti dkk. 2012. Relative Clause in Jambi Malay and Kerinci Malay. Presented in International Workshop on Clause Combining in/around Indonesia 7-8 Oktober 2012 Tokyo University of Foreign Language.
Pangesti, Fida. 2019. Senyapan dan Kilir Lidah Berdampingan dalam Produksi Ujaran. Hasta Wiyata, 2 (1), 1-10.
Piantadosi, S. T.; Tily, H.; & Gibson, E. (2011). Reply to Reilly and Kean: Clarifications on Word Length and Information Content. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,108 (20), E109–E109. https://www.pnas.org/content/108/20/E109. short.
Prihatini, A. (2018). Perpindahan Frasa Nomina Benefactive ke Argument-position dalam Kalimat Pasif Bitransitif pada Ragam Bahasa Lisan Anak Usia Prasekolah. KEMBARA Journal of Scientific Language Literature and Teaching, 4(2), 128-140.
Prihatini, A., Sunaryo, S., & Nurchasanah, N. (2016). Perpindahan Frasa Nomina Penderita dalam Kalimat Pasif Monotransitif. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(5), 844-854.
Prihatini, A. (2019). Semantic Network of The Word Association in The Field of Law. LITERA, 18(3), 430-446.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v16i2.11393
Copyright (c) 2021 LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Member of:
Indexed by:
Editorial Office:
Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Email: jurnallingua@gmail.com
Phone: +62 (0)341 570872
LiNGUA by Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/humbud/index.