SEEING BEYOND WORDS: METAFUNCTIONS ANALYSIS OF EFL TEXTBOOKS

Hieronimus Canggung Darong

Abstract


This study carefully applies Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) to identify common linguistic patterns to examine English as a Foreign Language (EFL) textbooks. This descriptive qualitative study addresses the ideational, interpersonal, and textual metafunctions of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) textbooks as the research focus. The frequent use of material process, particular nominal group types such as Thing (T) and Numerative Thing (NT), the nuanced modality conveyed by "should," "would," and "will," and the use of narrative perspectives with third-person singular pronouns ("he" and "she") are noteworthy among these patterns. The identified linguistic features furnish invaluable pedagogical insights for the stakeholders of English learners, including the teachers, and provide guidance for targeted language instruction. Furthermore, these results are also invaluable for material development since the study highlights the importance of integrating SFL principles within the classroom discourse. The study also emphasizes the significance of SFL-based textbooks as learning facilitates. The study discovers that SFL-based textbook analysis provides well-informed instruction, allowing teachers to modify their teaching methods to meet students' communicative needs better. Despite limitations, the analysis remains a valuable tool in the classroom discourse as it better portrays the foreign language classroom discourse.

Keywords


Systemic Functional Linguistic; ideational metafunction; interpersonal metafunction; textual metafunction; English as a Foreign Language

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmadian, M. J. (2012). Task repetition in ELT. ELT Journal, 66(3), 380–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs020

Alshenqeeti, H. (2020). Representation of Culture in EFL Textbooks and Learners’ Preference. Pedagogy : Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v7i2.1647

Alwasilah, Y. A., & Gunawan, W. (2023). A Systemic Functional Linguistic Study on Language Use of Indonesian Students in Writing. Jomantara: Indonesian Journal of Art and Culture, 3(2), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.23969/jijac.v3i2.3

Alyousef, H. S. (2021). Text Cohesion in English Scientific Texts Written by Saudi Undergraduate Dentistry Students: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Textual and Logical Relations in Oral Biology Texts. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032194

Anggraenei, A., Santosa, I., Media, U., & Citra, N. (2022). Neoliberalism In EFL Textbook. Content Analysis. 6(4). https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v6i4.3794

Ariawan, S., Kholidi, M. A., & Putra, M. (2023). The Level of Thinking Skills in the Reading Section of EFL Textbook in Indonesia. VELES: Voices of English Language Education Society, 7(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i1.7672

Bakken, J., & Andersson-Bakken, E. (2021). The textbook task as a genre. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(6), 729–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1929499

Darong, H. C. (2022). What does Systemic Functional Linguistics say about speech? A discourse-semantic analysis. World of Media. Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies, 4(December), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.47855/jal9020-2022-4

Darong, H. C., Jem, Y. H., & Guna, S. (2022). Lexical Cohesion Devices in Students’ Narrative Text and Its Pedagogical Implication in Language Teaching (A Discourse- Semantics Point of View). Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 12(1), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v12.i1.202228

Darong, H. C., Menggo, S., & Jelimun, M. O. (2016). A Comparative Analysis (Discourse Semantic Analysis on the Political Speech based on Systemic Functional Linguistics Theory). Nyimak Journal of Communication, 6(2), 207–227.

Darong, H. C. (2021). From Clause to Function: Texts Analysis Using Systemic Functional Linguistics Theory and Its Pedagogical Implication in Language Teaching. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 6(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v6i1.337

Darong, H. C. (2022b). Interpersonal Function of American Political Speech (Systemic Functional Linguistics Approach). Ijotl-Tl, 7(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.30957/ijoltl.v7i1.626.such

Darong, H. C. (2022c). Register Categories (Field, Tenor, Mode) of the Text. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 25(2), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i2.4724

Darong, H. C., Jem, Y. H., & Niman, E. M. (2021). Character Building: The Insertion of Local Culture Values in Teaching and Learning. JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), 5(3), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v5i3.4001

Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics.

Firmansyah, Viola, L., & Arianti, T. (2022). Communication Strategies Used In EFL Textbook In Conversation Models. 4(2), 100–114.

Gunantar, D. A. (2017). Textbooks Analysis: Analyzing English As a Foreign Language (EFL) Textbooks From the Perspective of Indonesian Culture. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 11(2), 173–182.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold.

Hanifa, R. (2018). EFL Published Materials: An Evaluation of English Textbooks for Junior High School in Indonesia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.2p.166

Harahap, I. A., Saragih, A. ., & Zainuddin, Z. . (2022). Text Types Used in the Textbooks: A Systemic Linguistic–Based Study. Linguistik Terapan, 18(3), 218. https://doi.org/10.24114/lt.v18i3.31395

Hasan, R. (2014). Towards a Paradigmatic Description of Context: Systems, Metafunctions, and Semantics. Functional Lingusitics, 1(9), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-014-0009-y

Henry, O. (2023). Transitivity Analysis in Short Story The Last Leaf By O. Henry. English Language and Literature, 12(3), 456-464. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v12i3.116308

Nurhadi Maya, A., Eliza, & Safitri, L. (2020). An Analysis of Transitivity in Reading Text for Second Grade Students of Senior High School. ELLTER Journal, 1(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.22236/ellter.v1i2.5449

Rahimi, M., & Hassani, M. (2012). Attitude towards EFL textbooks as a predictor of attitude towards learning English as a foreign language. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.018

Rassaei, E. (2014). Effects of Textual Enhancement and Input Enrichment on L2 Development. Tesol Journal, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.149

Rinekso, A. B. (2021). The Representation of 21st Century Skills in an Indonesian EFL Textbook. LLT Journal: Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 24(1), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v24i1.2655

Sari, N., Saragih, A., & Pulungan, A. H. (2020). External and Internal Conjunctions in the News Story Text of the Jakarta Post. Linguistik Terapan, 17(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.24114/lt.v17i1.19761

Siregar, Y., Pasaribu, A. N., & Sinambela, E. (2021). An Analysis of Mood and Modality. PIONEER: Journal of Language and Literature, 13(2), 302. https://doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v13i2.1299

Somba, Y. Y. R., Liando, N. V. F., & Kumayas, T. A. (2022). A Study on Types of Vocabulary Tasks in EFL Textbook English on The Sky 1. JoTELL: Journal of Teaching English, Linguistics, and Literature, 1(4), 528-549. https://doi.org/10.2801/jotell.v1i4.3904

Soto, S. T., & Cevallos, L. F. E. (2021). An analysis of EFL textbooks in public secondary schools of ecuador1. Mextesol Journal, 45(4).

To, V. (2018). Linguistic Complexity Analysis: A Case Study of Commonly Used Textbooks in Vietnam. SAGE Open, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018787586

Troyan, F. J., Harman, R., & Zhang, X. (2022). Critical SFL praxis in teacher education: Looking backward and looking forward (Introduction to special issue on Systemic Functional Linguistics as Critical Praxis in Teacher Education: Looking Backward and Looking Forward). Language and Education, 36(3), 294–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1960559

Wahid, M. Q., Qalyubi, I., & Qamariah, Z. (2023). An Analysis of Cultural Contents in EFL Textbook: Bahasa Inggris untuk SMP / MTs Kelas VII. Journal on Education, 6(1), 9119–9129.

Wang, J. (2010). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Barack Obama’s Speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.3.254-261

Wang, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2018). Systemic-functional linguistics in China (2010–2016). Word, 64(1), 9–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2018.1427085

Xiang, R., & Yenika-Agbaw, V. (2021). EFL textbooks, culture and power: a critical content analysis of EFL textbooks for ethnic Mongols in China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42(4), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1692024

Yang, S. (2021). A Systemic Functional Study of the System of Modality in Chinese. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040075

Zhang, X. (2019). EFL Writers’ Reconstruction of Writing Beliefs in a Functional Linguistics-Based Curriculum: What Does the Trajectory Look Like? SAGE Open, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019853915




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v18i2.23402



Copyright (c) 2023 LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Member of:

Crossref

Indexed by:

Dimension Google Scolar  Sinta Sinta   Journal TOCS     

Editorial Office:
Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Email: jurnallingua@gmail.com
Phone: +62 (0)341 570872


Creative Commons License
LiNGUA by Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/humbud/index.