CAN AUTOMATIC POETRY GENERATION INFUSE VALUES? UNVEILING INSIGHTS THROUGH CONTENT ANALYSIS OF GENERATED POETRY

S. Rizal Yazid, Mutmainnah Mustofa, Ulil Fitriyah

Abstract


This research examines the value underlying poetry created by artificial intelligence (AI), aiming to uncover the complex interaction of religious, philosophical, ethical, and aesthetic values presented in poetry. Eighteen poems generated by three different AI platforms were analyzed using the content analysis method to identify their social values. The results of this research demonstrate the presence of (1) religious values by revealing the AI’s ability to explore traditional and cultural barriers, highlighting themes of spirituality and faith, (2) philosophical values through the exploration of questions of human existence and the nature of reality, showing the AI's capacity to engage with deep existential themes, (3) ethical values by promoting concepts of unity, fairness, and justice, reflecting deeper humanistic perspectives and societal ideals, and (4) aesthetic values by showcasing an interest in the influence of technology and a profound admiration for the natural world's wonders, integrating modern innovation with timeless beauty. In conclusion, AI-generated poetry successfully captures a broad spectrum of human values, enriching literary traditions and intellectual discussions. This intersection of AI and poetry not only highlights technological advancements in creative fields but also opens new avenues for exploring how machines can contribute to cultural and artistic expressions, fostering a deeper understanding of the human condition and societal values.

Keywords


AI-generated poetry; content analysis; value exploration; creative expression; ethical implications

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adeoye-Olatunde, O. A., & Olenik, N. L. (2021). Research and scholarly methods: Semi-structured interviews. JACCP: Journal of The American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 4(10), 1358–1367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1441

Ahuja, V. K. (2023). Artificial Intelligence And Copyright Issues And Challenges. ILI Law Review, Winter. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372418545_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_AND_COPYRIGHT_ISSUES_AND_CHALLENGES

Ahuja, V. K. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Copyright: Issues and Challenges. ILI Law Review, Winter. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3864922

Aldalabeeh, Y. A. N. (2018). Ordinary Themes Presented with an Extra-ordinary Talent: An Overview of Emily Dickinson's Notable Poems. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 60. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.60

Anantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(1), 589–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7

Arora, P., & Lal, C. (2023). Aesthetic of Poetry of Postmodernism Poets: A Review. The Creative Launcher, 2(4), 291-299. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/7038/703876864042.pdf

Bayazidi, M. M. (2017). The Survey of Existentialism based on Nihilism in Novel of “Latin Neighborhood” (al-Hayyo al-Latini) by Suhayl Idris. Journal of Arabic Language & Literature, 8(14), 150–181. https://doi.org/10.22067/jall.v8i14.47122

Boden, M. A. (2009). Computer Models of Creativity. AI Magazine, 30(3), 23–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v30i3.2254

Boden, M. A., & Edmonds, E. A. (2009). What is generative art? Digital Creativity, 20(1–2), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626260902867915

Bowyer, L., Amos, C., & Stevens, D. (2020). What is “philosophy”? Understandings of philosophy circulating in the literature on the teaching and learning of philosophy in schools. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 7(1), 38–67.

Bukhari, S. W. R., Hassan, S., Aleem, Y. (2024). Impact Of Artificial Intelligence on Copyright Law: Challenges and Prospects. Journal of Law and Social Studies, 5(4), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.52279/jlss.05.04.647656

Chamberlain, R., Mullin, C., Scheerlinck, B., & Wagemans, J. (2018). Putting the art in artificial: Aesthetic responses to computer-generated art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000136

Chin, C., & Levey, G. B. (2023). Recognition as acknowledgment: symbolic politics in multicultural democracies. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 46(3), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2022.2075233

Ciechanowski, L., Przegalinska, A., Magnuski, M., & Gloor, P. (2019). In the shades of the uncanny valley: An experimental study of human–chatbot interaction. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92, 539–548. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.01.055

Couenhoven, J. (2021). His Sovereignty Rules Over All: A Review of Recent Work on Divine Determinism. Modern Theology, 37(2), 508–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12643

Dignum, V. (2017). Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Designing AI for Human Values. ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries, Special Issue(1), 1–8. https://www.itu.int/en/journal/001/Pages/default.aspx

Dinçer, S. (2018). Content Analysis in Scientific Research: Meta-analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(1), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.363159

Elzohbi, M., & Zhao, R. (2023). Creative Data Generation: A Review Focusing on Text and Poetry. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.08493

Feldman, G. (2017). Making sense of agency: Belief in free will as a unique and important construct. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(1), e12293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12293

Fjelland, R. (2020). Why general artificial intelligence will not be realized. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0494-4

Frich, J., Biskjaer, M. M., & Dalsgaard, P. (2018). Twenty Years of Creativity Research in Human-Computer Interaction: Current State and Future Directions. Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 1235–1257. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196732

Gervás, P. (2013). Computational modeling of poetry generation. Artificial Intelligence and Poetry - AISB Convention, pp. 11–16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288288388_Computational_modelling_of_poetry_generation

Gheyle, N., & Jacobs, T. (2017). Content Analysis: A short overview. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33689.31841

Ghosh, A., Chakraborty, D., & Law, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence in the Internet of Things. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology, 3(4), 208–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1049/trit.2018.1008

Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057

Grba, D. (2022). Deep Else: A Critical Framework for AI Art. Digital, 2(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital2010001

Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and communication: A Human-Machine Communication research agenda. New Media and Society, 22(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819858691

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Heylighen, F., & Petrović, K. (2021). Foundations of ArtScience: Formulating the Problem. Foundations of Science, 26(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09660-6

Hill, A., Mary, S., & Okkema, L. (2018). Meaning-Making and Randomization in E-Poetry Machines. Proceedings of the Annual Computers & Writing Conference, 147–159.

Jeon, M. (2017). Robotic arts: Current practices, potentials, and implications. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti1020005

Kalonaris, S., & Jordanous, A. (2018). Computational Music Aesthetics: a survey and some thoughts. http://galapagos.ucd.ie/wiki/pub/OpenAccess/CSMC/Kalonaris.pdf

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Klein, T., & Olbrecht, M. (2011). Triangulation of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Panel Peer Review Research. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 2, 342-348. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2011.0048

Kleinheksel, A. J., Rockich-Winston, N., Tawfik, H., & Wyatt, T. R. (2020). Demystifying Content Analysis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 7113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7113

Knippenberg, L., de Groot, W. T., van den Born, R. J. G., Knights, P., & Muraca, B. (2018). Relational value, partnership, eudaimonia: a review. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 39–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.022

Lewis, F. D. (2022). The Spirituality of Persian Islamic Poetry. In V. J. Cornell & B. B. Lawrence (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Islamic Spirituality (pp. 372–394). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118533789.ch20

Li, Y. (2021). Intelligent Environmental Art Design Combining Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. Complexity, 2021(1), 1606262. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1606262

Limna, P., Jakwatanatham, S., Siripipattanakul, S., Kaewpuang, P., & Sriboonruang, P. (2022). A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education during the Digital Era. Advance Knowledge for Executives, 1(1), 1–9. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4160798

Lowe, A., Norris, A. C., Farris, A. J., & Babbage, D. R. (2018). Quantifying Thematic Saturation in Qualitative Data Analysis. Field Methods, 30(3), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X17749386

Manovich, L. (2002). The Language of New Media. MIT Press.

Mazzone, M., & Elgammal, A. (2019). Art, Creativity, and the Potential of Artificial Intelligence. Arts, 8(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010026

Mian, A. A. (2019). Love in Islamic philosophy. The Routledge Handbook of Love in Philosophy (pp. 395–408). Routledge.

Minion, A., & Taylor, S. (2023). Life in the Cosmos: Paradox of Silence and Self-Awareness. In H. J. M. Cuesta & K. H. Yeap (Eds.), Cosmology – The Past, Present, and Future of the Universe. Intechopen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1002241

Miroshnichenko, A. (2018). AI to bypass creativity. Will robots replace journalists? (The answer is “yes”). Information (Switzerland), 9(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/info9070183

Misztal-Radecka, J., & Indurkhya, B. (2014). Poetry Generation System With an Emotional Personality. International Conference on Computational Creativity. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274249704_Poetry_Generation_System_With_an_Emotional_Personality

Nenonen, S., Brodie, R., Storbacka, K., & Peters, L. (2016). Theorizing with managers: How to achieve both academic rigor and practical relevance? European Journal of Marketing, 51. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2017-0171

Nwoga, B. (2023). Investigation of the Intersection of Art and Technology: Review Literature. International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 1(1), 1–8.

Oksanen, A., Cvetkovic, A., Akin, N., Latikka, R., Bergdahl, J., Chen, Y., & Savela, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in fine arts: A systematic review of empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 100004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100004

Oliveira, H. G. (2017). A Survey on Intelligent Poetry Generation: Languages, Features, Techniques, Reutilisation and Evaluation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Natural Language Generation. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-3502

Oliveira, H. G. (2024). Automatic generation of creative text in Portuguese: an overview. Language Resources and Evaluation, 58(1), 7–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-023-09646-3

Pu, R., & Li, H. (2019). An overview of Chinese American poetry studies: 1988–2018. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 20(4), 620–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2019.1681083

Putu, L., Aryawan, K. F., Komang, N., Suwastini, A., Artini, N. N., Sri, G. A., Jayantini, R., Eva, K., & Adnyani, K. (2023). Literature for Character Building: What to Teach and How According to Recent Research. Lingua Scientia, 29(2), 59–71.

Remian, D. (2019). Augmenting Education: Ethical Considerations for Incorporating Artificial Intelligence in Education. Instructional Design Capstones Collection, p. 52. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/instruction_capstone

Rodríguez-Prat, A., & van Leeuwen, E. (2018). Assumptions and moral understanding of the wish to hasten death: a philosophical review of qualitative studies. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 21(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9785-y

Rui, Z., & Gu, Z. (2021). A Review of EEG and fMRI Measuring Aesthetic Processing in Visual User Experience Research. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2021, 2070209. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2070209

Russon, J. (2003). Human Experience: Philosophy, Neurosis, and the Elements of Everyday Life. State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book4676

Sealy, T. (2021). British converts to Islam: continuity, change, and religiosity in religious identity. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 36, 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2021.1965746

Shahriar, S. (2022). GAN computers generate art? A survey on visual arts, music, and literary text generation using generative adversarial network. Displays, p. 73, 102237. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.displa.2022.102237

She, J., & Cetinic, E. (2022). Understanding and Creating Art with AI: Review and Outlook. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 18, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3475799

Singhal, S., & Kalra, B. S. (2021). Publication ethics: Role and responsibility of authors. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 40(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-020-01129-5

Sisto, M., Lorenzo, L. H., de la Rosa, J., Ros, S., & Gonzalez-Blanco, E. G. (2024). Understanding poetry using natural language processing tools: a survey. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqae001

Sun, J. (2024). AIGC Fusion Exploration: The Intersecting Path of Digital Humanities and Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20, 327–335. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.1181

Supriyatno, T., Musaddad, C., El-Aribi, A., Muntakhib, A., & Taruna, M. M. (2021). Philosophy of Islamic Values and Life: A Review of the Methodology of Cultivating Islamic Values Towards Modern Culture. International Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies (IJCRS), 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijcrs

Tarnate, K. J. M., Garcia, M. M., & Sotelo-Bator, P. (2020). Short poem generation (SPG): A performance evaluation of hidden Markov model based on readability index and Turing test. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2, 294–297. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0110238

Wang, K., Tian, J., Gao, R., & Yao, C. (2018). The machine poetry generator imitating Du Fu’s styles. 2018 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD), 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIBD.2018.8396206

Wang, Y. (2023). Synthetic Realities in the Digital Age: Navigating the Opportunities and Challenges of AI-Generated Content. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.23968311

Wilson, H. J., & Daugherty, P. R. (2018). Collaborative Intelligence: Humans and AI Are Joining Forces. Harvard Business Review, 96(4), 114–123.

Yu, X. (2019). An Overview of the Evolution of Ancient Poetry Art Songs. 9th International Conference on Education and Social Science (ICESS 2019). https://doi.org/10.25236/icess.2019.079

Zhang, T. (2021). Aesthetics and Philosophical Interpretation of the “Intended Blank” in Chinese Paintings. Humanities & Social Science, 10(2), 64–74. www.ijahss.net




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v19i1.25482

Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Member of:

Crossref

Indexed by:

Dimension Google Scolar  Sinta Sinta   Journal TOCS     

Editorial Office:
Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Email: jurnallingua@gmail.com
Phone: +62 (0)341 570872

Creative Commons License
LiNGUA by Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/humbud/index.