PENGARUH PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN DAN PENGUASAAN SEMANTIK TERHADAP PENINGKATAN PEMAHAMAN MAKNA PUISI

Kinayati Djojosuroto

Abstract


The article presents in this research findings is intended to determine the influence of teaching approach and semantic mastery on the increase of students'  achievement of poetry comprehension of the students of the Education of  Language and Literature program of the Language and Art Major of the Manado State University (UNIMA). The teaching approach as an independent variable is divided into three levels: Gestalt, Structural, and Semiotic. The semantic mastery as an attribute variable is divided into high semantic mastery and low semantic mastery. The research method employed in this study was quasi-experiment with before-after design through the factorial of 3 x 2 of the two-way analysis of ariance technique (ANAVA). The sample of this research was the students who were studying the poem appreciation subject. Based on the result of inferential analysis of the data, several conclusions may be drawn. First, there is a difference in the increase of achievements of poetry comprehension of the groups of students who are taught using  Gestalt approach, structural approach, and semiotic approach (p <0.05).  Among the three groups, the Gestalt group shows the highest increase. Second, the group of students with high semantic mastery shows a higher increase of achievement in poetry comprehension than those with low semantic mastery (p <0.05).   Third, there is an interaction between teaching approach and semantic mastery in terms of the increase of the students' achievement (p <0.05).

Keywords


Poetry; Gestalt; Structural; Semiotics; Semantics; Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Chaer. 2000. Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia , Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Ann Jefferson. 1992. Structuralism and Post Structuralism. Modern Literary theory: A

Comparative Introduction. London: Batsford Academic and educational Ltd.

Henry G. Tarigan. 1999, Pengajaran Semantik, Bandung: Angkasa

John Lyons. 2001. Semantics Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Culler, J. D. 2008. Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London: Routledge.

Lobey, Modern Literary Theory: A Comparative Introduction (London: Batsford Academic and Educational Ltd.

Oemar Hamalik. 1998. Mengajar Asas Metode Teknik. Bandung: Pustaka Martina

Puji Santosa. 1998. Ancangan Semiotika dan Pengkajian Sastra. Bandung: Angkasa

Sumadi Suryabrata. 2003. Psikologi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Teeuw. 1994. Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra , Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya

Thomas L. Good. 2001. Education Psychology, London: Longman

Wallace, Robert. 1997. Writing Poems. Boston, Toronto: Little Brown and Company.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v9i1.2560



Copyright (c)



Member of:

Crossref

Indexed by:

Dimension Google Scolar  Sinta Sinta   Journal TOCS     

Editorial Office:
Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Email: jurnallingua@gmail.com
Phone: +62 (0)341 570872


Creative Commons License
LiNGUA by Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/humbud/index.