BREAKING ROMANCE CONVENTIONS: HERO/HEROINE DYNAMICS IN ROWELL’S ELEANOR & PARK

Fara Maulina Adzkia, Asni Furaida

Abstract


This study examines Eleanor & Park, a contemporary romance novel by Rainbow Rowell, through the lens of Janice Radway's ideal romance formula. The novel portrays two central characters, Eleanor and Park, whose relationship deviates from traditional romance norms, offering a fresh perspective on love and identity. The objective of this paper is to explore how Rowell's characterization of the hero, Park, and the heroine, Eleanor, aligns with or challenges the conventional ideals of romance characters as outlined by Radway. Eleanor embodies traits of the ideal heroine—she is intelligent, spunky, and independent—while Park, although strong and caring, does not fully fit the traditional masculine hero image. This deviation from the typical hero archetype, combined with Eleanor's struggles and vulnerability, challenges the stereotypical gender roles typically found in romance novels. The study adopts a New Criticism approach, focusing on intrinsic elements of the text, particularly characterizations and plot structure, without considering external influences such as the author's biography or social context. The analysis finds that the characters' roles in the story push against traditional boundaries, as Eleanor's resilience and emotional depth redefine the notion of the ideal heroine, while Park’s more sensitive and less traditionally masculine traits complicate the idealization of the romantic hero. Furthermore, the novel’s plot emphasizes emotional growth, mutual understanding, and empathy over dominance or stereotypical gender dynamics. The open-ended conclusion of the story further subverts the expectations of a conventional romance, presenting the relationship as a tool for personal development rather than a perfect, idealized union. In doing so, the novel offers a more nuanced portrayal of teenage relationships, highlighting their impermanence and complexity. Ultimately, Eleanor & Park invites readers to reconsider conventional romance narratives by focusing on the internal growth and emotional connections between characters rather than adhering to formulaic depictions of love. This study contributes to a broader understanding of contemporary romance novels and their potential for depicting more diverse, realistic, and empowering portrayals of love and identity.

Keywords


Romance; Ideal Hero; Ideal Heroine; Impact on the Story; Eleanor & Park

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrams, M. H. (1999). A glossary of literary terms (7th ed.). Heinle & Heinle Pub.

Bansal, A.B. (2020). The role of new criticism in literary criticism. JETIR: Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 7(2).

Carter, D. R. (2006). Literary theory. No Exit Press.

Cawelti, J. G. (1972). The concept of formula in the study of popular literature. The Bulletin of Midwest Modern Language Association, 5, 115. https://doi.org/10.2307/1314918

Cawelti, J. G. (1976). Adventure, mystery and romance: Formula stories as art and popular culture. University of Chicago Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226148700.001.0001

Gray, P. (2000, March 20). Publishing: Passion on the page. https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,996381,00.html

Hayati, K. R., & Emeraldien, F. Z. (2019). Janice Rodway’s ideal romance in hero (Chirstian Grey) and heroine (Anastasia Steel): An analysis of Fifty Shades of Grey by E.L James. Tell: Teaching of English Language and Literature Journal, 7(1), 1–10. doi:10.30651/tell.v7i1.2653

Holman, C. H. (1980). A handbook to literature: Based on the original edition by William Flint Thrall and Addison Hibbard. Bobbs-Merill Education Pub.

Ilief-Martinescu, A. (2016). Postfeminist fiction in chick lit novels. Gender Studies, 14(1), 119-137). https://doi.org/10.1515/genst-2016-0008

Intan, T. (2020). Romance formula in ‘Perfect Romance’ by Indah Hanaco: Feminist literature analyse. Alayasastra, 16(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.36567/aly.v16i2.634

Intan, T., & Hasanah, F. (2020). Deviasi formulasi romance dalam novel Elle Et Lui karya Marc Lévy. Metahumaniora, 10(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.24198/metahumaniora.v10i1.26957

Intan, T., & Tri Handayani, V. (2019). The romance formulation in beauty case by Icha Rahmanti: Feminist literature study. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v10i2.13

Kiosses, S. (2021). Plot theory and creative writing: Manipulating readers’ desire and expectation. International Journal of Education and Social Science Research, 4(4), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.37500/ijessr.2021.4417

Luthfiah, Y. R., Assiddiqi, H., & Permanaludin, U. (2023). Ideal Romance Formula in The Movie Script of Emma (2020) and Persuasion (2022): Comparative Literature. Saksama: Jurnal Sastra, 2(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.15575/sksm.v2i1.24820

Martono, M. (2010). Aliran new criticism dalam dunia sastra (Sebuah Kajian). Jurnal Cakrawala Kependidikan, 8(2).

Michaels, L. (2007). On writing romance: How to craft a novel that sells. Writer’s Digest Books.

Radway, J. (1983). Women read the romance: The interaction of text and context. Feminist Studies, 9(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.2307/3177683

Radway, J. A. (1991). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Univ of North Carolina Press.

Regis, P. (2007). A natural history of the romance novel. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Rowell, R. (2012). Eleanor & Park. UK: Hachette.

Sumardjo, J., & Saini, K. M. (1986). Apresiasi kesusastraan. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory today: A user-friendly guide (2nd ed.). https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA78918596

Wijanarka, H. (2022). Cinderella formula: The romance begins. Journal of Language and Literature, 22(2), 481-489. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i2.5121




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v19i2.27039



Copyright (c) 2025 LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Member of:

Crossref

Indexed by:

Dimension Google Scolar  Sinta Sinta   Journal TOCS     

Editorial Office:
Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Email: jurnallingua@gmail.com
Phone: +62 (0)341 570872


Creative Commons License
LiNGUA by Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/humbud/index.