Deny Efita Nur Rakhmawati, Agung Wiranata Kusuma


The digital native generation emergent triggers the educational practitioner to develop a new way of approaching the teaching practice in the classroom. As it is claimed that this generation has a unique characteristics and way of learning. Therefore, this paper explore the experience of the first year student of English language and letters department in using technology. Students were asked about their access to, use of and preferences for a wide range of established and emerging technologies and technology based tools using a questioner developed to assess their level of digital nativity. The results show that many first year students are highly tech-savvy. However, each student’s experience on the use of technologies and tools (e.g. computers, mobile phones) show considerable variation. The findings are analyzed using the Prensky’s theory on the ‘Digital Natives’ and the implications for using technology to support teaching and learning in higher education. The reported data indicate that for a range of emerging technologies were used intensively by the students. Furthermore, the majority of the respondents also claimed that they used the tools and technology to support their study. However, it is inconclusive as how the student integrate the tools and technology in their study.


digital native; learning and technology; first-year student

Full Text:



Bryant, T. (2006). Social software in academia. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29, 61-64.

Caruso, J.B., & Kvavik, R. (2005). ECAR study of students and information technology 2005: Convenience, connection, control, and learning. CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Retrieved December, 2015 from

Downes, S. (2004). Educational blogging. EDUCAUSE Review, 39, 14–26.

Dede, C. (2005). Planning for "neomillennial" learning styles: Implications for investments in technology and faculty. In J. Oblinger and D. Oblinger (Eds.) Educating the Net Generation. EDUCASE.

Frand, J. L. (2000). The information-age mindset. Changes in students and implications for higher education. EDUCAUSE Review, 35(5), 15-24.

Gros, B. ( 2003). The impact of digital games in education. Retrieved September 16, 2015, from

Helsper, E.J. & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36, 503-520.

Instone, L. (2005). Conversations beyond the classroom: Blogging in a professional development course. In Balance, Fidelity, Mobility: Maintaining the momentum? Proceedings ASCILITE 2005. Retrieved September 25, 2015, from


Katz, R. (2005). Foreword: Growing up digital. In J. B. Caruso & R. Kvavik (Eds), ECAR study of students and information technology, 2005: Convenience, connection, control, and learning. EDUCAUSE.

Kirkwood, A. & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the 21st century: What do we know about students' attitudes and experiences of ICT that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), 257-274.

Lorenzo, G., Oblinger, D. & Dziuban, C. (2006). How choice, co-creation, and culture are changing what it means to be net savvy. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 30(1).

Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers & Gen-Xers, Millennials: Understanding the “New Students”. EDUCAUSE.

Oblinger, D.G. & Oblinger, J.L. (Eds) (2005). Educating the Net Generation. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE.

Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5)

Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, Part II; Do They Really Think Differently? On the Horizon, 9(6).

Rodley, C. (2005). Meeting the demands of the Net Gen. UniNews: The University of Sydney, 37(13), 1,4.

Robinson, M. (2008). Digital nature and digital nurture: libraries, learning and the digital native Library Management, 29(1/2), 67-76.

Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.

Williams, J. B. & Jacobs, J. (2004). Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 232-247.


Copyright (c) 2016 LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra

Member of:


Indexed by:

Dimension Google Scolar  Sinta Sinta   Journal TOCS     

Editorial Office:
Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Phone: +62 (0)341 570872

Creative Commons License
LiNGUA by Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at