Enhancing English Productive Skills Learning through Technology-Mediated Instructions: Meeting Students’ Expectations and Needs

Nur Lailatul Aqromi, Adi Surya Irawan

Abstract


This study examines the qualitative enhancement of students’ English productive skills, explicitly speaking and writing, following an eight-session Basic English course employing technology-facilitated teaching. At the outset, students completed a questionnaire to express their expectations, particularly concerning improving their English productive skills. Throughout the course, students participated in eight sessions that integrated technology-enhanced learning tools, such as Quizizz, video presentations, and augmented PowerPoint slides. Additionally, students were encouraged to explore and present their ideas using various technological platforms. Following the completion of the sessions, a final questionnaire and interviews were carried out to assess the effectiveness of the instruction. The findings demonstrated substantial enhancements in students' written and spoken proficiency, encompassing heightened speaking confidence, broadened vocabulary, and improved writing ability. The findings suggest that integrating technology in instructional approaches significantly enhances students' learning experiences and successfully fulfills their initial expectations.

Keywords: English class, students’ expectations, English speaking, English writing, technology in class, teaching with technology


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmadi, Dr. M. R. (2018). The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.2.115

Bates, A. W., & Poole, G. (2005). Effective Teaching With Technology In Higher Education: Foundations For Success (Vol. 19). http://batesandpoole.ubc.ca

Bishop, M. J., Boling, E., Elen, J., & Svihla, V. (2020). Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology: Learning Design: Fifth Edition. In Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology: Learning Design: Fifth Edition. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36119-8

Creswell, J. W. , & P. C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dr. Monika Bajaj. (2020). The Role Of Digital Learning Platforms In Enhancing Student Engagement. In Unified Visions: Collaborative Paths In Multidisciplinary Research, Volume-1. Scribe And Scroll Publishing. https://doi.org/10.25215/819818984X.01

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2007). Blended Learning in Higher Education. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269558

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. . Routledge.

Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers and Education, 90, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005

Marshall, C. , & R. G. B. (2016). Designing Qualitative Research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Nkomo, L. M., Daniel, B. K., & Butson, R. J. (2021). Synthesis of student engagement with digital technologies: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00270-1

Powell, K. C., Cody, E. D., & Kalina, J. (n.d.). Cognitive And Social Constructivism: Developing Tools For An Effective Classroom.

Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. In International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (Vol. 14, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0

Schreiber, L. M., & Valle, B. E. (2013). Social Constructivist Teaching Strategies in the Small Group Classroom. Small Group Research, 44(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413488422

Schwieter, J. W. ., & Benati, A. G. . (2021). The Cambridge handbook of language learning. Cambridge University Press.

Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/jeasp.v8i1.33187

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

image hostimage hostimage hostimage hostimage hostDESKRIPSI GAMBARimage host

 

Editorial Office:
Pusat Pengembangan Bahasa
Program Khusus Pengembangan Bahasa Inggris (PKPBI)
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gedung C lantai 1
Jl. Gajayana No 50 Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Kode Pos 65144, Telp/Fax : (0341) 570872
Email: jeasp@uin-malang.ac.id

 

image host

JEASP : Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International