Dari Mikroskop ke Machine Learning: Tinjauan Literatur tentang Teknologi Pemeriksaan Spermatozoa pada Kasus Persetubuhan (2019–2024)

Neshya Ruriana Putri

Abstract


Background:   Forensic examination of semen in cases of sexual intercourse (e.g., sexual assault) aims to detect the presence of spermatozoa or male-specific biomarkers in vaginal swab samples from victims. Conventional methods, including microscopic examination with staining and chemical tests (acid phosphatase and prostate-specific antigen/PSA), are routinely used but have limitations in sensitivity and specificity. In the past five years, advancements have emerged in semen detection technology, including Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP), Y-STR (Y chromosome short tandem repeat) analysis, sperm-specific aptamers, and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for automated identification. Objective: This review article aims to summarize current literature (2019–2024) regarding spermatozoa detection methods in vaginal swab samples, covering both conventional and innovative techniques. MethodsLiterature was searched through international and national databases using relevant keywords including “forensic sperm detection,” “vaginal swab semen,” “LAMP for sperm,” “Y-STR sexual assault,” “aptamer sperm detection,” and “CNN sperm microscope” within the publication range of 2019–2024. Results: Recent studies confirm that microscopy (histological staining) and chemical testing (acid phosphatase and PSA) remain the initial standard for semen examination. However, both are presumptive and susceptible to false-positive or false-negative results. LAMP and Y-screen methods demonstrated high sensitivity in detecting male-specific DNA, comparable to Y-STR profiling. Fluorescent DNA aptamers selectively bind to sperm cells, enhancing detection speed and accuracy. The application of CNN to colored microscopic images has enabled automated “sperm hunting” with accuracy exceeding 90%, significantly expediting laboratory analysisConclusion:  Conventional methods such as microscopy and chemical assays remain essential in forensic semen analysis, but show limited reliability in low-sperm samples or cases involving azoospermic perpetrators. Emerging techniques based on DNA, biochemical markers, and artificial intelligence offer improvements in sensitivity, specificity, and detection efficiency. Integration of multi-method approaches is recommended to optimize outcomes. Further standardization and research are needed to facilitate widespread implementation of these novel technologies in forensic laboratories.


Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Gooch J, Tungsirisurp S, Costanzo H, Napier R, Frascione N. Generating aptamers towards human sperm cells using massively parallel sequencing. [cited 2025 Jun 18]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03562-7

2. Chunkul S, Sathirapatya T, Dangklao P, Kawicha P, Tammachote R, Vongpaisarnsin K. Enhancing the forensic sexual assault investigations with LAMP-based male DNA detection. Forensic Sci Int. 2025 Jun 1;10:100567.

3. Owers R, McDonald A, Montgomerie H, Morse C. A casework study comparing success rates and expectations of detecting male DNA using two different Y-STR multiplexes on vaginal swabs in sexual assault investigations where no semen has been detected. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Nov 1;37:1–5.

4. Saumana DTI. Analisa Perbandingan Sensitivitas PSA dan Mikroskopik Sperma Untuk Pembuktian Adanya Tanda-tanda Persetubuhan Pada Kasus Kekerasan Seksual = Comparative Analysis The Sensitivity of PSA And Sperm Microscopic in Proving The Presence Of Rape Signs In Sexual Violance Case. 2024 Apr 18;

5. Adhayati B, Hermawati L, Furqoni AH, Humaniora D, Medikolegal D, Kedokteran F, et al. Touch Dna Dalam Penerapan Ilmu Forensik: Tinjauan Literatur. Jurnal Ilmu Kedokteran dan Kesehatan [Internet]. 2025 May 29 [cited 2025 Jun 20];12(5):1109–17. Available from: https://ejurnalmalahayati.ac.id/index.php/kesehatan/article/view/20611

6. Golomingi R, Haas C, Dobay A, Kottner S, Ebert L. Sperm hunting on optical microscope slides for forensic analysis with deep convolutional networks – a feasibility study. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2022 Jan 1;56:102602.

7. Mousawi F, Haidar M, Al Otaibi D. Conventional Serological and Microscopic Techniques for Human Body Fluid Detection. Advances in Forensic Biology and Genetics [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jun 18];23–45. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-96-4585-5_2

8. Soares MAC, Falci DHM, Farnezi MFA, Farnezi HCM, Parreiras FS, Gomide JVB. Automated Sperm Head Morphology Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings - 2022 35th Conference on Graphics, Patterns, and Images, SIBGRAPI 2022. 2022;270–5.

9. Urli S, Corte Pause F, Dreossi T, Crociati M, Stradaioli G. Evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for bull sperm morphology evaluation. Theriogenology. 2025 Oct 1;245:117504.

10. Lyle Curry B, Laura Heathfield S. The evaluation of tests for the identification of semen. 2016 [cited 2025 Jun 18]; Available from: https://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/20288

11. Rathod N V. International Medico-Legal Reporter Journal Literature Review: Forensic Analysis or Identification of Semen. 2021 [cited 2025 Jun 18]; Available from: www.legaldesire.com/forensics

12. Budiningsih Y, Widiatmaka W. The validity of rapid test to detect prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in seminal fluid.

13. Guida J, Fukunaga A, Liu H. Biomarker validation of self-reported sex among middle-aged female sex workers in China. Ann Epidemiol. 2017 Mar 1;27(3):181-186.e1.

14. Gamblin AP, Morgan‐Smith RK. The characteristics of seminal fluid and the forensic tests available to identify it. WIREs Forensic Science. 2020 May;2(3).

15. Scott A, Jackson K, Carter M, Comeau R, Layne T, Landers J. Rapid sperm lysis and novel screening approach for human male DNA via colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Nov 1;43:102139.

16. Owers R, McDonald A, Montgomerie H, Morse C. A casework study comparing success rates and expectations of detecting male DNA using two different Y-STR multiplexes on vaginal swabs in sexual assault investigations where no semen has been detected. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Nov 1;37:1–5.

17. Kim TY, Zhu X, Kim SM, Lim JA, Woo MA, Lim MC, et al. A review of nucleic acid-based detection methods for foodborne viruses: Sample pretreatment and detection techniques. Food Research International. 2023 Dec 1;174.

18. Costa R, Fadoni J, Amorim A, Cainé L. Y-STR Databases-Application in Sexual Crimes. 2025 [cited 2025 Jun 18]; Available from: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

19. Scott A, Jackson K, Carter M, Comeau R, Layne T, Landers J. Rapid sperm lysis and novel screening approach for human male DNA via colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Nov 1;43:102139.

20. Chunkul S, Sathirapatya T, Dangklao P, Kawicha P, Tammachote R, Vongpaisarnsin K. Enhancing the forensic sexual assault investigations with LAMP-based male DNA detection. Forensic Sci Int. 2025 Jun 1;10:100567.

21. Scott A, Jackson K, Carter M, Comeau R, Layne T, Landers J. Rapid sperm lysis and novel screening approach for human male DNA via colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Forensic Sci Int Genet [Internet]. 2019 Nov 1 [cited 2025 Jun 18];43. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31487605/

22. Gooch J, Tungsirisurp S, Costanzo H, Napier R, Frascione N. Generating aptamers towards human sperm cells using massively parallel sequencing. Anal Bioanal Chem [Internet]. 2021 Sep 1 [cited 2025 Jun 18];413(23):5821. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8437879/

23. Tay JW, Joudo J, Tran T, Ta H, Botting JL, Liew YC, et al. Comparison of Crime-lite® 82S, Polilight® PL400 and Polilight® PL500 for the detection of semen and saliva stains. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2021;53(4):483–93.

24. Gooch J, Tungsirisurp S, Costanzo H, Napier R, Frascione N. Generating aptamers towards human sperm cells using massively parallel sequencing. [cited 2025 Jun 18]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03562-7

26. Soroka M, Wasowicz B, Rymaszewska A. Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP): The Better Sibling of PCR? Cells [Internet]. 2021 Aug 1 [cited 2025 Jun 19];10(8):1931. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8393631/

27. Costa R, Fadoni J, Amorim A, Cainé L. Y-STR Databases-Application in Sexual Crimes. 2025 [cited 2025 Jun 19]; Available from: https://creativdecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

28. Buku Referensi Pemeriksaan Forensik DNA Tulang dan Gigi. 2020;

29. Ratna Pertiwi K. Penerapan Teknologi DNA dalam Identifikasi Forensik.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/jim.v9i2.34930

Refbacks



 

Editorial Office:

Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences,
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim
Gedung Ibnu Thufail Lt.1, Jln. Locari, Desa Tlekung, Kota Batu
Faximile (+62) 341 558933
e-mail: medicaljournal@uin-malang.ac.id


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.