Metode AHP-Fuzzy untuk Menentukan Tingkat Prioritas Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika dan Psikotropika

Rahmah Navi'ah Muzafanti, Evawati Alisah, Fachrur Rozi

Abstract


Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a method in decision making by analyzing multi-attribute decisions with many criteria and alternatives. these weaknesses, then the incorporation of fuzzy concepts is carried out, because there is a range of values that can cover the uncertainty of decision making in AHP. The merger of the two concepts is known as Analytical Hierarchy Process-Fuzzy or AHP-Fuzzy. The AHP-Fuzzy method uses an extended analysis with a triangular fuzzy membership function or TFN. Meanwhile, there is data on narcotics and psychotropic crimes. The data contains the indictment of each defendant containing the articles violated, prison sentences, and fines. Because it fulfills the AHP-Fuzzy method by having the main criteria. The author takes the formulation of the problem, namely the AHP-Fuzzy method to determine the priority level of criminal acts of narcotics and psychotropic abuse. This research aims to find out how the role of the AHP-Fuzzy method in criminal case data. The adjustment of the method when processing criminal offense data, producing the final result is at the stage of determining the crisp value and weighting. Before entering the crisp value determination stage, first determine the variables and the range of values that adjust the data conditions. Then, the weighting stage contains the results of the multiplication between AHP priority weights and weight vectors in fuzzy concepts. Thus, each of the main criteria has a different percentage priority level. The highest priority level is article 114, followed by article 112, article 111, and article 127. This priority level information can be used as a reference in preventing the spread of narcotics and psychotropic drugs, especially in Malang City.


Keywords


AHP-Fuzzy; level priority; crimes; narcotic and psychotropic

Full Text:

XML

References


A. E. Munthafa and H. Mubarok, "Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Mahasiswa Berprestasi," Jurnal Siliwangi, vol. 3, no. No. 2, pp. 192-201, 2017.

Hafiyusholeh and A. H. Asyhar, "Vektor Prioritas dalam Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dengan Metode Nilai Eigen," Jurnal Matematika "Mantik", vol. 01, no. 02, pp. 44-49, Mei 2016.

T. L. Saaty, "Decision-making the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary," European Journal of Operational Research, pp. 85-91, 2003.

A. Santoso, "Aplikasi Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process untuk Menentukan Prioritas Pelanggan Berkunjung ke Galeri," Jurnal Gaussian, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 239-248, 2016.

G.-H. Tzeng and J.-J. Huang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, London: CRC Press, 2011.

S. Kusumadewi, Fuzzy Multi-Atribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM), Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2006.

S.-J. Chen and C.-L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods, vol. 375, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992.

D.-Y. Chang, "Applications of The Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 95, pp. 649-655, 1996.

C. Kahraman, "Decision-Making, Fuzzy Multi-Criteria," in Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Istanbul, Turkey, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2008, p. Vol. 16.

F. Susilo, Himpunan dan Logika Kabur serta Aplikasinya, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2006.

H. Sasangka, Narkotika dan Psikotropika dalam Hukum Pidana, Cetakan I ed., Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003, pp. 105-107.

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika, Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2009.

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1997 Tentang Psikotropika, Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 1997.

A. Jelena M and D.-G. Lu, "Tsunami Risk Assessment of Bridges Based on An AHP-Fuzzy Algorithm," Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life Extension, July 2014.

Thomas, L; Saaty; G, Luis; Vargas, "Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytical Hierarchy Process," in International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, New York, Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London, 2012, pp. 53-83.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/jrmm.v3i3.22596

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.