Marketing Strategy in Political Competition: A Case of the Campaign Team Samahuddin and La ntau
Abstract
Abstract:
This study aims to understand and explore the political marketing strategy of SAMATAU's campaign team in winning the political competition at the local level. Using a single Holistic interpretative case study (Robert K Yin, 2011), on the campaign team of Samahuddin - La Ntau, in this case as, the incumbent challenger as well as the winner of the Regent Election in 2017. The results of the study show that although the Samahuddin-La Ntau couple was categorized as a newcomer to the political competition, the campaign team of SAMATAU had several conditions and strategies in winning the competition including surveying and grouping voters, understand the characteristics and nature of voters, target actions, political image formations (framing), and also implementation of political programs that include political products, political campaigns, political venues, and political capital. In order to control the political programs that have been designed by the contestant, then the SAMATAU team conducts scheduled and unscheduled monitoring and evaluation. The implication of this study is that political marketing strategies give information to politicians, where this strategy is a systematic approach to help competitors in winning political competition.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Berry, William D. et al. 2000. Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries. Florida State University
Creswell, W. John.2016. Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset, Memilih diantara lima pendekatan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Firmanzah. 2008. Pemasaran politik, antara pemahaman dan realitas.Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Harris, P., & Lock, A. 2010. Mind the gap: The rise of political marketing and a perspective on its future agenda. European Journal of Marketing. Vol. 44(3–4), Pp. 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1108/0309056101102043
Keith, R. 1960. The Marketing Revolution. Journal of Marketing. 24 (January
Kotler. 2001. Manajemen Pemasaran Edisi Milenium, Edisi Ke 10
Kotler, Philips. Sounders, John. Armstrong Gary. Wong, Veronica. 1999. Principel Of Marketing. USA: Prentice Hall Inc. A Simon & Schuster Company.
Lees-Marshment, J. 2011. The Political Marketing Game.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299511
Lock, A., & Harris, P. 1996. Political marketing – vive la différence . European Journal of Marketing. Vol. 30(10), Pp. 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610149764
Mehta, Parag2009, The Office of the Public Liaison Presidential Transition Team. interviewed post-2008 presidential campaign and transition over the phone, 29 January.
Naig, U. 2016. For AIADMK, high jinks over high burnout. Hindu. Retrieved 12 September 2017, from India
Neffinegger 1989. Strategies for succsess from the political marketers.The European Journal of Marketing.
Newman, B. I.1994b. The Forces Behind the Merging of Marketing and Politics.Werbeforschung& Praxis. Vol. 39 ( 2), pp. 41-46
Moleong, Lexy.J. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. edisi revisi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Osuagwu, L. 2008. Political marketing: Conceptualisation, dimensions and research agenda. Marketing Intelligence and Planning. Vol. 26(7), Pp. 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500810916726
O'Cass, Aron. 2001. Political Marketing: AN Investigation of the Political Marketing concept and political market orientation in Australian Politics. European Journal of Marketing.Vol.35 (9/10), Pp. 1003-25.
Peng, Norman & Hackley, Chris. 2009. Are voters, consumers? A qualitative exploration of the voter-consumer analogy in political marketing. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal. Vol. 12 No. 2. School of Management, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK
Pich, C.,Armannsdottir, G., & Spry, L. 2018. An Exploratory Case Study Focusing on the Creation, Orientation, and Development of a New Political Brand: The Case of the Jury Team. Politics and Policy. Vol. 46(1), Pp. 141–181
Phillips, J. M., Reynolds, T. J., & Reynolds, K.2010. Decision-based voter segmentation: An application for campaign message development. European Journal of Marketing. Vol. 44(3–4), Pp. 310–330.
Potincu, R. C. 2009. Features of the socio-political marketing. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. vol. 2, no. 51
Rohr SChneider I. Robert.2002. The Democracy Deficit and Mass Support for an EU-wide Government. Indiana University. JSTOR
Sugiarto, Bowo et al. 2014. Head of regency election winning strategy. Masyarakat, kebudayaan dan politik. Vol. 27 (3), Pp. 149-157. FISIP universitas jendral sudirman. Purwakerto
Vaishnav, Milan & Guy, Johnathan. 2018. Does Higher Turnout Hurt Incumbents? An Analysis of State Elections in India. SAG
Yin, Robert.K. 2011. case study research: Design And Methods. 4 th Edition. SAGE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/mec-j.v4i1.7041
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Editorial Office:
Faculty of Economics,
State Islamic University of Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gajayana Street 50, Malang-East Java, Indonesia 65144
Phone (+62) 341 558881, Facsimile (+62) 341 558881
e-mail: mecjournal@uin-malang.ac.id
P-ISSN 2599-3402
E-ISSN 2598-9537
MEC-J is licensed under CC-BY-SA
© All rights reserved 2017.
MEC-J INDEXED IN:
Member of: