Online Submissions

Already have a Username/Password for CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi?
Go to Login

Need a Username/Password?
Go to Registration

Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of current submissions.

Author Guidelines

Manuscripts submitted to CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi must present original research that makes a clear scientific contribution to pure or applied mathematics. Submissions must be methodologically rigorous, logically sound, and written in clear academic English. Manuscripts must provide sufficient detail to enable readers to understand and verify the mathematical arguments, methods, computational procedures, or empirical findings and, where applicable, reproduce the study. All claims and conclusions must be supported by appropriate evidence, analysis, computation, or mathematical reasoning.

Manuscripts must explicitly identify the research gap addressed by the study and clearly articulate the novelty and scientific contribution of the work. The research gap must be supported by relevant and up-to-date scholarly literature and must demonstrate why the study is necessary. The novelty and scientific contribution must explain how the work advances existing mathematical knowledge, methods, applications, or understanding beyond the current state of the art. The research objective, research gap, novelty, and scientific contribution must be stated explicitly in the final paragraph of the Introduction. Manuscripts that do not adequately demonstrate these elements may be returned for revision or rejected without external review.

All manuscripts must be written in English. Regular research articles are normally expected to be between 10 and 16 pages, including the abstract, main text, figures, tables, and references. Literature review articles are normally expected not to exceed 25 pages and must include at least 25 peer-reviewed references. Longer manuscripts may be considered when the additional length is scientifically justified by the mathematical content, methodological complexity, theoretical development, computational procedures, or requirements for verification and reproducibility. Appendices may exceed the recommended length when they are essential to the clarity or completeness of the manuscript.

Note: For initial submission, authors may upload the manuscript in .pdf, .doc, .docx, or .zip format containing the LaTeX source files. Manuscripts submitted in Microsoft Word format are permitted for initial editorial evaluation and peer review. However, after acceptance, the final manuscript must be prepared using the official CAUCHY LaTeX template and submitted as a compressed .zip file containing all necessary source files, references, figures, tables, and supplementary materials.

Submission Checklist

Before submitting a manuscript, authors must ensure that the following requirements have been fulfilled:

• The manuscript is submitted in .pdf, .doc, .docx, or .zip format containing the LaTeX source files.
• The manuscript has not been previously published and is not currently under consideration by another journal.
• All authors have read, reviewed, and approved the submitted manuscript, including the order of authorship.
• The manuscript presents original research relevant to the focus and scope of CAUCHY.
• The final paragraph of the Introduction explicitly states the research objective, research gap, novelty, and scientific contribution of the study.
• A CRediT authorship contribution statement is included in the manuscript.
• Any use of generative AI or AI-assisted technologies has been disclosed in accordance with the journal’s policy.
• Statements concerning competing interests, funding, ethical considerations, and data availability have been included where applicable.
• If the manuscript is accepted, the final version will be submitted in LaTeX format using the official CAUCHY template.

Manuscript Structure

Authors should organize their manuscripts according to the following structure. Each section must be developed appropriately in accordance with the nature of the study. Reasonable structural adaptations may be accepted for theoretical, proof-based, computational, methodological, or interdisciplinary studies, provided that all essential information is presented clearly.

1. Title (recommended length: no more than 15–20 words)
   The title must be concise, specific, and informative. It should accurately reflect the main topic, method, object, or scope of the study. Authors are encouraged to include relevant terms that improve the discoverability of the manuscript while avoiding unnecessary abbreviations, formulas, or overly general expressions.
2. Author(s) and Affiliation(s)
   Provide the full name of each author, institutional affiliation, city, and country. The email address of the corresponding author must be provided. The order of authors must reflect the agreement and contributions of all authors.
3. Abstract (recommended length: approximately 150–250 words)
   The abstract must be self-contained and should briefly present the research background, objective, method or mathematical approach, principal results, and main implications or contributions of the study. A slightly longer abstract may be accepted when necessary to explain complex mathematical methods, theoretical results, computational procedures, or reproducibility-related information. The abstract must not contain citations, displayed equations, figures, tables, or unexplained abbreviations.
4. Keywords (3–5 keywords; alphabetical order; semicolon-separated)
   Provide three to five keywords that accurately represent the main content of the manuscript. Keywords must be arranged alphabetically and separated by semicolons.
5. Introduction
   The Introduction must present the background, research context, and scientific significance of the study. It should critically review relevant previous work to establish the current state of the art and identify the unresolved problem, theoretical limitation, methodological limitation, practical challenge, or research opportunity addressed by the manuscript.
   
   The research gap must be supported by sufficient scholarly evidence and must not be based solely on a general statement that previous studies are limited. The Introduction should explain the relationship between the proposed study and existing literature and demonstrate why the study is necessary.
   
   The final paragraph of the Introduction must explicitly state:
   1. the research objective;
   2. the research gap addressed by the study;
   3. the novelty of the proposed work; and
   4. the scientific contribution of the study in relation to existing literature.
   The relevant literature review should normally be integrated concisely into the Introduction. A separate Related Work or Literature Review section is generally discouraged unless its inclusion is scientifically justified by the scope or complexity of the study.
6. Methodology
   The Methodology section must describe the research design, mathematical framework, theoretical approach, assumptions, definitions, propositions, models, algorithms, proof strategy, data sources, computational procedures, software, parameter settings, experimental design, and evaluation methods relevant to the study.
   
   The description must be sufficiently clear and detailed to allow readers to understand, assess, verify, and, where appropriate, reproduce the work. For computational or data-driven studies, authors should provide sufficient information regarding data preparation, model configuration, training procedures, validation methods, evaluation metrics, random seeds, computational environment, and software implementation where relevant.
   
   Flowcharts, diagrams, algorithms, or pseudocode may be included when they improve the clarity and reproducibility of the methodology.
7. Results and Discussion
   The main findings of the study must be presented clearly, systematically, and in a logically coherent manner. The Results and Discussion may be presented as a combined section or divided into separate labeled subsections, depending on the nature of the study.
   
   For empirical, computational, numerical, or experimental studies, authors are encouraged to organize this section into the following subsections:
   • Results: Present the principal findings objectively and systematically, supported by appropriate tables, figures, numerical results, mathematical expressions, statistical analyses, or other relevant evidence.
   • Discussion: Interpret the findings, explain their scientific significance, relate them to the research objective and research gap, compare them with relevant previous studies, and discuss theoretical or practical implications, limitations, and possible directions for future research.
   For theoretical or proof-based studies, authors may adapt the presentation as appropriate. Theorems, propositions, lemmas, proofs, examples, counterexamples, or corollaries may constitute the main results, provided that their meaning, significance, and relationship to existing knowledge are clearly explained.
8. Conclusion
   The Conclusion must summarize the principal findings and overall significance of the study. It should directly address the research objective and highlight the main scientific contribution without merely repeating the abstract or results. The Conclusion may include limitations, recommendations, potential applications, or directions for future research when appropriate.
9. CRediT Author Contributions
   The specific contribution of each author must be stated using the CRediT taxonomy. Relevant roles may include Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration, and Funding Acquisition.
   
   Example:
   YR: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft;
   NM: Data Curation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing.
10. Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies
    CAUCHY permits the transparent and responsible use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in manuscript preparation and research activities. Such technologies may be used to support language improvement, translation, readability, organization, literature processing, code development, mathematical computation, modelling, data analysis, visualization, image generation, or technical presentation, provided that their use complies with the principles of research integrity, transparency, originality, and reproducibility.
    
    Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies must not replace the authors’ own critical thinking, mathematical reasoning, scientific judgment, interpretation, or original contribution. Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, validity, integrity, originality, references, citations, mathematical arguments, data, figures, images, results, and final content of the manuscript.
    
    AI tools must not be listed as authors or co-authors because they cannot assume responsibility for the submitted work, approve the final manuscript, disclose competing interests, or enter into publication agreements.
    
    Authors must review, verify, and edit all AI-assisted output before including it in the manuscript. Generative AI or AI-assisted technologies must not be used to fabricate, falsify, manipulate, or misrepresent data, results, mathematical proofs, references, citations, figures, images, or any other research content.
    
    AI-generated or AI-assisted figures, illustrations, or visual materials are permitted when their use is scientifically appropriate, ethically acceptable, and transparently disclosed. Authors must ensure that such materials do not misrepresent research evidence, violate copyright, disclose confidential information, or create misleading interpretations. AI-generated visual materials used only for decorative purposes must be clearly distinguished from figures presenting scientific data or research results.
    
    If generative AI or AI-assisted technologies are used as part of the research method, data analysis, code development, mathematical modelling, simulation, visualization, or experimental workflow, their use must be described transparently and reproducibly in the Methodology section. The description should include the name and version of the tool or service, the purpose of use, relevant procedures or prompts where necessary, the verification process, and the extent of human oversight.
    
    The use of generative AI or AI-assisted technologies in manuscript preparation must be disclosed in a separate section placed before the References and entitled Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies. Basic spelling, grammar, formatting, and punctuation checks that do not generate or substantially modify manuscript content do not require disclosure.
    
    Where disclosure is required, authors may use the following format:
    
    During the preparation of this work, the author(s) used [name and version of the tool or service] for [purpose of use]. The author(s) reviewed, verified, and edited the generated or assisted content as necessary and take full responsibility for the accuracy, integrity, and final content of the publication.
    
    If generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were used as part of the research methodology, authors should provide a more detailed statement appropriate to the study.
    
    If no generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were used, authors should state:
    
    No generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were used during the preparation of this manuscript.
11. Declaration of Competing Interest
    Authors must disclose any financial or non-financial competing interests that could reasonably be perceived as influencing the research, interpretation, or publication of the work. If there are no competing interests, authors should state:
    
    The authors declare no competing interests.
12. Funding and Acknowledgments
    All sources of financial support must be clearly identified, including the funding institution, grant name, and grant number where applicable. If the study received no external funding, authors should state:
    
    This research received no external funding.
    
    Acknowledgments may be included for individuals, institutions, laboratories, or organizations that supported the study but do not meet the criteria for authorship. Individuals mentioned in the Acknowledgments should be informed and, where necessary, provide permission to be named.
13. Ethical Considerations
    If the study involves human participants, animals, surveys, interviews, personal information, health information, confidential records, sensitive data, or other materials requiring ethical oversight, authors must provide a statement confirming ethical approval or formal exemption from an appropriate ethics review body. The statement should include the name of the ethics committee, approval number, and relevant consent procedures where applicable.
    
    For studies that do not involve human participants, animals, personal data, or sensitive materials, authors may state:
    
    Ethical approval was not required for this study.
14. Data Availability
    Authors must state where and how the data supporting the findings of the study can be accessed. Where applicable, the statement should include the repository name, URL, DOI, accession number, or other relevant access information.
    
    If the data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, this condition must be stated explicitly. If the data cannot be shared because of confidentiality, legal restrictions, ethical considerations, licensing requirements, or third-party ownership, authors must provide a clear justification.
    
    For purely theoretical studies that do not use or generate research datasets, authors may state:
    
    No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
15. References
    References must be prepared using the IEEE citation style. Regular research articles must include at least 15 references, while literature review articles must include at least 25 references. Authors are expected to cite relevant, authoritative, and up-to-date scholarly literature that adequately represents the state of the art.
    
    For rapidly developing research areas, authors should prioritize recent peer-reviewed journal articles, particularly publications from the last five years. However, foundational, classical, or historically significant references may be included when they are scientifically relevant, especially in pure mathematics and theoretical studies.
    
    Authors should avoid excessive self-citation and should not cite references solely to increase citation counts. Unpublished materials, inaccessible sources, personal communications, and non-scholarly websites should be avoided whenever reliable scholarly sources are available. DOI information must be provided whenever available.
    
    Authors are fully responsible for ensuring that every reference is accurate, accessible, relevant, cited in the manuscript, and not fabricated or generated without verification.

Figures, Tables, Algorithms, and Equations

• Captions for tables must be placed above the table.
• Captions for figures must be placed below the figure.
• Captions for algorithms must be placed above the algorithm or pseudocode block.
• All captions must use sentence case and provide sufficient information to allow the figure, table, or algorithm to be understood.
• Every figure, table, algorithm, and numbered equation must be explicitly referred to and discussed in the main text.
• Figures, tables, and algorithms must be referred to using the appropriate \autoref{label} or \ref{label} command in accordance with the official CAUCHY template.
• Equations should be numbered only when they are explicitly referred to in the text.
• Numbered equations must be referred to using the equation-reference command defined in the official CAUCHY template, such as \eqref{label} or an equivalent journal-defined command.
• Figures must be provided in sufficiently high resolution and must remain legible when displayed or printed at the intended size.
• Tables must be editable and should not be submitted solely as images.
• Symbols, abbreviations, variables, and notation must be defined and used consistently throughout the manuscript.
• Authors must ensure that figures, images, tables, algorithms, and other materials do not violate copyright or third-party intellectual property rights.

Additional Notes

• Authors must follow the official CAUCHY template and formatting requirements when preparing the final accepted manuscript.
• The manuscript must use clear, consistent, and academically appropriate English.
• The research gap, novelty, and scientific contribution must be stated explicitly in the final paragraph of the Introduction but should not be repeated excessively throughout the manuscript.
• All mathematical notation, terminology, abbreviations, and symbols must be used consistently.
• All figures, tables, algorithms, and numbered equations must be clearly referred to and explained in the text.
• Authors must retain the underlying data, computational files, code, proofs, records, or other supporting materials necessary to verify the study, where applicable.
• Manuscripts that substantially fail to comply with these guidelines may be returned to the authors for correction or may be rejected without external review.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

1. The manuscript has not been formally published and is not currently under consideration by another journal. Manuscripts previously presented at a conference or deposited in a recognized preprint repository are eligible for submission, provided that this information is clearly disclosed in the Comments to the Editor and that the submitted manuscript complies with the journal’s originality and copyright policies.
2. The manuscript is submitted in one of the following formats: .pdf, .doc, .docx, or .zip (for LaTeX sources). If accepted, the final version must be submitted in LaTeX as a compressed .zip file, as required by the journal. Authors are strongly encouraged to use the official CAUCHY LaTeX Template to ensure proper formatting.
3. The manuscript includes at least 15 references (or 25 references for literature review articles), with at least 80% sourced from peer-reviewed journals published within the last five years. DOI links or URLs have been provided wherever available.
4. A CRediT Author Contributions section has been provided at the end of the manuscript, detailing each author's role.
5. Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies is included where required, disclosing the name of the tool/service, purpose of use, and author review. Basic spelling, grammar, and punctuation checks that do not substantially change the manuscript do not require disclosure. If no generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were used, this is explicitly stated.

6. I understand and agree to the journal’s Article Processing Charges (APC) policy. No submission fee or regular peer-review fee is charged. The APC is payable only after the manuscript has been accepted.

   The journal offers two submission tracks:

   • Regular Track: Select the section “Articles.” The APC is IDR 1,500,000 for authors affiliated with Indonesian institutions and USD 120 for authors affiliated with institutions outside Indonesia. The review process typically takes up to 2 months per review round, with an estimated overall processing time from submission to acceptance of 16 to 20 weeks.
   • Fast Track Review: Select the section “Fast Track Review.” Fast Track Review is an optional service for prioritizing the editorial and peer-review process. The Fast Track Review fee is IDR 750,000 and is charged in addition to the APC; it does not replace or include the APC. The review process typically takes up to 2 weeks per review round, with an estimated overall processing time from submission to acceptance of 6 to 8 weeks.

   Fast Track Review is intended only to accelerate the editorial and peer-review process. Actual processing time may vary depending on reviewer availability and the extent of revisions required. Fast Track Review does not guarantee acceptance, and all manuscripts are evaluated according to the same academic, editorial, and ethical standards.

   Please select the appropriate section during submission according to your preferred track.

Copyright Notice

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered on this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Personal data may be processed for journal operations, including manuscript submission, peer review, editorial communication, publication, indexing, and archiving. Access to relevant data is limited to authorized journal personnel (editors and journal staff) and, where necessary for peer review, to assigned reviewers.

By using this site and submitting a manuscript, authors and reviewers acknowledge that such processing is necessary for the editorial and publishing workflow. The journal applies reasonable administrative and technical measures to protect personal data from unauthorized access.

For questions regarding this Privacy Statement or requests related to personal data, please contact:

Mathematics Department,
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144
Faximile (+62) 341 558933
Email: cauchy@uin-malang.ac.id

CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.