Option Pricing Using Modification of Black Scholes Merton Model with GJR-GARCH

Fatimah Oktaviani, Emy Siswanah

Abstract


Option pricing is an important topic in modern finance as it plays a role in investment strategy and risk management. The Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) model introduced in 1973has become the standard in option pricing, but the assumption of constant volatility and symmetry makes this model often less suitable for volatile and asymmetric market conditions. This study aims to modify the BSM by incorporating volatility estimated through the Glosten-Jagannathan-Runkle GARCH (GJR-GARCH) model, and compare its performance with the Fractional Black-Scholes-Merton (FBSM) model. The data used is the daily closing price of Apple Inc. shares for the period January 7, 2022 to March 7, 2025 obtained from Yahoo Finance. The research procedure includes stationarity test using Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF), ARIMA identification, heteroscedasticity testing, and volatility estimation with GJR-GARCH (1,1) model. European call option prices are estimated by BSM and FBSM using both historical volatility and GJR-GARCH volatility. The results show that the FBSM model with GJR-GARCH (1,1) volatility provides the most accurate estimation with a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 4.08%. In contrast, the BSM with historical volatility yields a MAPE of 17.25%. These findings confirm that the integration of FBSM with GJR-GARCH volatility is more realistic and reliable in option pricing under dynamic and asymmetric market conditions.

Keywords


Black Scholes Merton; Fractional Black Scholes Merton; GJR-GARCH; European call

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] J. C. Hull. Risk Management and Financial Institutions. 5th ed. United States: Wiley, 2018.

[2] L. R. Glosten, R. Jagannathan, and D. E. Runkle. “On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks”. In: Journal of Finance 48.5 (1993), pp. 1779–1801. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x.

[3] T. Bollerslev. “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity”. In: Journal of Econometrics 31.3 (1986), pp. 307–327. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1.

[4] D. A. N. Njomen and E. Djuetcha. “Solving Black–Scholes Equation Using Standard Fractional Brownian Motion”. In: Journal of Mathematics Research 11.2 (2019), pp. 142–150. doi: 10.5539/jmr.v11n2p142.

[5] N. Nurhayati, W. Apriani, and A. W. Bustan. “Value at Risk Prediction for the GJR-GARCH Aggregation Model”. In: Pattimura International Journal of Mathematics 1.1 (2022), pp. 1–6. doi: 10.30598/pijmathvol1iss1pp01-06.

[6] P. Morales-Bañuelos, N. Muriel, and G. Fernández-Anaya. “A Modified Black–Scholes–Merton Model for Option Pricing”. In: Mathematics 10.9 (2022), p. 1492. doi: 10.3390/math10091492.

[7] E. Siswanah, A. M. Idrus, and M. M. Hakim. “Binomial Method in Bermudan Option”. In: Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Natural Science 3.2 (2023), pp. 161–171. doi: 10.47352/jmans.2774-3047.178.

[8] C. Dritsaki. “An Empirical Evaluation in GARCH Volatility Modeling: Evidence from the Stockholm Stock Exchange”. In: International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 7.2 (2017), pp. 366–390. doi: 10.4236/jmf.2017.72020.

[9] C. Brooks. Introductory Econometrics for Finance. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

[10] W. W. Winarno. Analisis Ekonometrika dan Statistika dengan EViews. 6th ed. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN, 2017.

[11] L. Scrucca. “Entropy-Based Volatility Analysis of Financial Log-Returns Using Gaussian Mixture Models”. In: Entropy 26.11 (2024), p. 907. doi: 10.3390/e26110907.

[12] J. Lindgren. “A Generalized Model for Pricing Financial Derivatives Consistent with Efficient Markets Hypothesis: A Refinement of the Black–Scholes Model”. In: Risks 11.2 (2023), p. 24. doi: 10.3390/risks11020024.

[13] K. A. Sidarto. Matematika Keuangan. Bandung: ITB Press, 2019.

[14] S. F. N. Islam, A. Sholahuddin, and A. S. Abdullah. “Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) Method in Forecasting Application and Analysis of USD Exchange Rates Against Rupiah”. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1722.1 (2021), p. 012016. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012016.

[15] Ruey S. Tsay. Analysis of Financial Time Series. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2021.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v11i1.37426

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Fatimah Oktaviani, Emy Siswanah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office
Mathematics Department,
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144
Faximile (+62) 341 558933
e-mail: cauchy@uin-malang.ac.id

Creative Commons License
CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.