Evaluating Hierarchical Pathfinding A* (HPA*) for Multi‑Order Routing in a Small Warehouse Layout

Ig. Prasetya Dwi Wibawa, Meta Kallista, Ramdhan Nugraha, Heni Widayani, Harish Chandra Bhandari, Angga Rusdinar

Abstract


Hierarchical Pathfinding A* (HPA*) is a hierarchical search framework that partitions grid‑based environments into clusters to reduce computational time while preserving a near-optimal path. The warehouse layout features cross-aisle connectivity, and multi-order optimization is performed using the HPA* algorithm, which integrates travel times with multi-rack picking times to the objective cost function. We simulate by assigning 30 random orders, with a total of 10641 items stored in the warehouse and 10 item types. The travel time is calculated assuming a picker has a constant speed of 1.2 m/s along edges, the picking time is proportional to the number of items picked per rack, and a small warehouse layout. Estimated cycle times of the orders (travel plus picking time) range from 114.4 to 349.9 seconds using the HPA* optimization, with a mean of 232.0 seconds. From the optimization results, orders require an average of 5.2 rack visits, ensuring that the picker travels more than two racks per order. The HPA* reduces the original low‑level graph (50 nodes and 61 edges, including base and stage station) to a graph with 22 nodes and 17 edges, enabling faster route computation while preserving observed cycle‑time patterns when combined with picking-time durations. Compared to A*, given the layout and orders, HPA* demonstrates an efficient warehouse path‑planning method that reduces search computation while maintaining near‑optimal routing performance.

Keywords


HPA*, hierarchical pathfinding, warehouse routing, multi-order, route optimization.

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] Z. Honglin, W. Yaohua, H. Jinchang, and W. Yanyan, “Collaborative optimization of task scheduling and multi-agent path planning in automated warehouses,” Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 5937–5948, 2023.

[2] F. Chen, G. Xu, and Y. Wei, “Heuristic routing methods in multiple-block warehouses with ultra-narrow aisles and access restriction,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 228–249, 2019.

[3] K. J. Roodbergen and R. Koster, “Routing methods for warehouses with multiple cross aisles,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1865–1883, 2001.

[4] Y. Zhang, M. C. Fontaine, V. Bhatt, S. Nikolaidis, and J. Li, “Multi-robot coordination and layout design for automated warehousing,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search, vol. 17, 2024, pp. 305–306.

[5] A. Maoudj and A. L. Christensen, “Improved decentralized cooperative multi-agent path finding for robots with limited communication,” Swarm Intelligence, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 167–185, 2024.

[6] D. Hercog, J. Marolt, P. Bencak, and T. Lerher, “Autonomous Mobile Robots and Their Integration into the Order-Picking Process,” in Warehousing and Material Handling Systems for the Digital Industry: The New Challenges for the Digital Circular Economy, Springer, 2024, pp. 275–308.

[7] A. Papadimitriou, D. Folinas, and I. Kostavelis, “Human-robot collaborative picking system for agile warehouses,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 141, no. 7, pp. 4627–4644, 2025.

[8] M. Zhang, E. H. Grosse, and S. Emde, “Ergonomic Task Allocation in an AMR-Assisted Order Picking System,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 2622–2627, 2025.

[9] Z. Zhang, Q. Guo, J. Chen, and P. Yuan, “Collision-free route planning for multiple AGVs in an automated warehouse based on collision classification,” IEEE access, vol. 6, pp. 26 022–26 035, 2018.

[10] P. Pikulin, V. Lishunov, and K. Kułakowski, “Optimizing Path Planning for Automated Guided Vehicles in Constrained Warehouse Environments: Addressing the Challenges of Non-Rotary Platforms and Irregular Layouts.,” Robotics, vol. 14, no. 4, 2025.

[11] K. Wang, W. Liang, H. Shi, J. Zhang, and Q. Wang, “Optimal time reuse strategy-based dynamic multi-AGV path planning method,” Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 7089–7108, 2024.

[12] F. Nikkhoo, A. Husseinzadeh Kashan, E. Nikbakhsh, and B. Ostadi, “A bi-objective multi warehouse multi-period order picking system under uncertainty: A benders decomposition approach,” Soft Computing, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 2047–2074, 2025.

[13] P. Verma, J. M. Olm, and R. Suarez, “Traffic management of multi-agv systems by improved dynamic resource reservation,” IEEE access, vol. 12, pp. 19 790–19 805, 2024.

[14] E. Hu, J. He, and S. Shen, “A dynamic integrated scheduling method based on hierarchical planning for heterogeneous agv fleets in warehouses,” Frontiers in neurorobotics, vol. 16, p. 1 053 067, 2023.

[15] W. Hönig, S. Kiesel, A. Tinka, J. W. Durham, and N. Ayanian, “Persistent and robust execution of MAPF schedules in warehouses,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1125–1131, 2019.

[16] G. Csányi and L. Z. Varga, “Clustered reverse resumable A* algorithm for warehouse robot pathfinding,” Machines, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 1127, 2025.

[17] N. Smolic-Rocak, S. Bogdan, Z. Kovacic, and T. Petrovic, “Time windows based dynamic routing in multi-AGV systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 151–155, 2009.

[18] A. Botea, M. Müller, and J. Schaeffer, “Near optimal hierarchical path-finding.,” J. Game Dev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2004.

[19] M. Duan, Z. Wang, X. Shao, and G. Ren, “VGA*-RRT*: A mobile robot path planning algorithm for irregular and complex maps,” IEEE Access, 2025.

[20] J. Xin, Q. Yuan, A. D’Ariano, G. Guo, Y. Liu, and Y. Zhou, “Dynamic unbalanced task allocation of warehouse AGVs using integrated adaptive large neighborhood search and Kuhn–Munkres algorithm,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 195, p. 110 410, 2024.

[21] Ž. Breznikar, J. Gotlih, Ž. Artič, and M. Brezočnik, “Improving AGV path planning efficiency using Genetic Algorithms with hamming distance-based initialization,” Advances in production engineering & management, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 299–308, 2025.

[22] Y. Liu, “Global path planning method for AGV of warehousing logistics based on improved ant colony algorithm.,” International Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 32, no. 1, 2025.

[23] G. Sartoretti et al., “Primal: Pathfinding via reinforcement and imitation multi-agent learning,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 2378–2385, 2019.

[24] M. Damani, Z. Luo, E. Wenzel, and G. Sartoretti, “Primal _2: Pathfinding via reinforcement and imitation multi-agent learning-lifelong,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, 365 no. 2, pp. 2666–2673, 2021

[25] K. Okumura, M. Machida, X. Défago, and Y. Tamura, “Priority inheritance with back tracking for iterative multi-agent path finding,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 310, p. 103 752, 2022.

[26] S. Bi, R. Shang, H. Luo, Y. Xu, Z. Li, and Y. Zhang, “Hac-based adaptive combined pick-up path optimization strategy for intelligent warehouse,” Intelligent Service Robotics, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1031–1043, 2024.

[27] M. Jansen and M. Buro, “HPA* enhancements,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, vol. 3, 2007, pp. 84–87.

[28] H. Antikainen, “Using the hierarchical pathfinding A* algorithm in GIS to find paths through rasters with nonuniform traversal cost,” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 996–1014, 2013.

[29] M. Wu, E. L. M. Su, C. F. Yeong, B. Dong, W. Holderbaum, and C. Yang, “A hybrid path planning algorithm combining a* and improved ant colony optimization with dynamic window approach for enhancing energy efficiency in warehouse environments,” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 10, e2629, 2024.

[30] Y. Zhang, Y. Hu, J. Lu, and Z. Shi, “Research on path planning of mobile robot based on improved theta* algorithm,” Algorithms, vol. 15, no. 12, p. 477, 2022.

[31] A. Y. Alqahtani, “Improving order-picking response time at retail warehouse: A case of sugar company,” SN Applied Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 8, 2023.

[32] D. Loske, M. Klumpp, E. H. Grosse, T. Modica, and C. H. Glock, “Storage systems’ impact on order picking time: An empirical economic analysis of flow-rack storage systems,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 261, p. 108 887, 2023.

[33] S. Altarazi and M. Ammouri, “Multi-criteria simulation evaluation for manual-order-picking warehouse design,” in Proceedings of the 34th European Modeling & Simulation Symposium (EMSS 2022), 2022, p. 010. doi: 10.46354/i3m.2022.emss.010. Available online.

[34] A. A. Bastapure, S. S. Chiddarwar, and A. Goyal, “A comparative study of a*, rrt, and rrt* algorithm for path planning in 2d warehouse configuration space,” in International Conference on Robotics, Control, Automation and Artificial Intelligence, Springer, 2022, pp. 95–107.

[35] Y. Zheng, Z.-H. Pang, Y. Han, et al., “A* algorithm-based agvs path planning for intelligent warehousing,” in 2025 Joint International Conference on Automation-Intelligence-Safety (ICAIS) & International Symposium on Autonomous Systems (ISAS), IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5.

[36] L. Kui and X. Yu, “A Pathfinding Algorithm for Large-Scale Complex Terrain Environments in the Field,” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 251, 2024.

[37] A. Taniguchi, S. Ito, and T. Taniguchi, “Hierarchical path planning from speech instructions with spatial concept-based topometric semantic mapping,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 11, p. 1 291 426, 2024.

[38] H. Ryu, “Hierarchical path-planning for mobile robots using a skeletonization-informed rapidly exploring random tree,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 21, p. 7846, 2020.

[39] V. T. Luu, F. Chromjaková, and R. Bobák, “An optimization approach for an order-picking warehouse: An empirical case,” Journal of Competitiveness, 2023.

[40] J. R. Sánchez-Ibáñez, C. J. Pérez-del-Pulgar, and A. García-Cerezo, “Path planning for autonomous mobile robots: A review,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 23, p. 7898, 2021




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v11i1.39659

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Ig. Prasetya Dwi Wibawa, Meta Kallista, Ramdhan Nugraha, Heni Widayani, Harish Chandra Bhandari, Angga Rusdinar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office
Mathematics Department,
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144
Faximile (+62) 341 558933
e-mail: cauchy@uin-malang.ac.id

Creative Commons License
CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.