Stability Analysis of a Three-Trophic Rice Ecosystem with Holling Type II and Crowley--Martin Responses

Anastasya Choirun Nisa', Dian Savitri

Abstract


This study examines three-trophic-level ecological dynamics in rice field ecosystems involving rice as the producer, brown planthoppers Nilaparvata lugens as herbivores, and Pardosa sp. as top predators. Population interactions were modeled using logistic growth for rice and two response functions: the Holling type II response for planthopper predation on rice, and the Crowley--Martin response for Pardosa sp. predation on planthoppers to capture predator interference. The resulting model was formulated as a system of nonlinear differential equations. Analytically, four equilibrium points were obtained: total population extinction, extinction of planthoppers and Pardosa sp., extinction of Pardosa sp., and coexistence of all three species. Local stability analysis at each equilibrium point was conducted using the Jacobian matrix and the Routh--Hurwitz criterion. Numerical simulations were performed for several parameter combinations by varying planthopper growth efficiency and Pardosa sp. predation intensity. Parameter values are obtained from relevant literature where available, and the remaining parameters are considered reasonable biological assumptions for exploring the dynamics of the system qualitatively. The simulation results were consistent with the theoretical analysis and showed that small changes in biological parameters could shift the system from stable coexistence to near extinction of the planthopper population. Ecologically, the model demonstrates that rice field ecosystem balance is strongly influenced by the interaction between planthopper reproductive capacity and the predatory strength of Pardosa sp., providing theoretical insights that may support the development of sustainable planthopper pest management strategies.

Keywords


Holling Type II; Functional Response; Crowley–Martin Functional Response; Three-Trophic Food Chain; Rice Field Ecosystem.

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] Weili Kong and Yuanfu Shao. “The effects of fear and delay on a predator-prey model with Crowley-Martin functional response and stage structure for predator”. In: AIMS Mathematics 8.12 (2023), pp. 29260–29289. doi: 10.3934/math.20231498.

[2] Nikos E. Papanikolaou, Theodore Kypraios, Hayden Moffat, Argyro Fantinou, Dionysios P. Perdikis, and Christopher Drovandi. “Predators’ Functional Response: Statistical Inference, Experimental Design, and Biological Interpretation of the Handling Time”. In: Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9 (2021), p. 740848. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.740848.

[3] An Nisa Salsabila and Dian Savitri. “Dynamical Analysis of Holling Tanner Prey Predators Model with Add Food in Second Level Predators”. In: Jambura Journal of Biomathematics 5.2 (2024). doi: 10.37905/jjbm.v5i2.25753.

[4] Ranjit Kumar Upadhyay and Raid Kamel Naji. “Dynamics of a three species food chain model with Crowley–Martin type functional response”. In: Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 42.3 (2009), pp. 1337–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2009.03.020.

[5] K. Shiva Reddy, K. Lakshmi Narayan, and N. Ch. Pattabhi Ramacharyulu. “A Three Species Ecosystem Consisting of a Prey, Predator and Super Predator”. In: Mathematics Applied in Science and Technology 2.1 (2010), pp. 95–107.

[6] Dian Savitri and Hasan S. Panigoro. “Bifurkasi Hopf pada model prey–predator–super predator dengan fungsi respon yang berbeda”. In: Jambura Journal of Biomathematics 1.2 (2020), pp. 65–70. doi: 10.34312/jjbm.v1i2.8399.

[7] Chaoqian Wang, Wenqiang Zhu, and Attila Szolnoki. “The conflict between self-interaction and updating passivity in the evolution of cooperation”. In: Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 173 (2023), p. 113667. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113667.

[8] C. S. Holling. “The Components of Predation as Revealed by a Study of Small-Mammal Predation of the European Pine Sawfly”. In: The Canadian Entomologist 91.5 (1959), pp. 293–320. doi: 10.4039/Ent91293-5.

[9] N. L. Aufaniyah and A. Abadi. “Dynamics of Prey–Predator Interaction with Type II Holling Response Function, Additional Food, and Anti-Predator Behavior”. In: Mathunesa Journal 11.3 (2023), pp. 422–433. doi: 10.26740/mathunesa.v11n3.p422-433.

[10] J. D. Murray. Mathematical Biology I: An Introduction. 3rd. New York: Springer, 2002.

[11] Mark Kot. Elements of Mathematical Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

[12] Jiemin Mo, Wanying Li, Donghuan He, Songbo Wang, and Xiaoliang Zhou. “Dynamic Analysis of a Predator–Prey Model with Holling-II Functional Response”. In: Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics 11.10 (2023). doi: 10.4236/jamp.2023.1110188.

[13] Shuangte Wang, Hengguo Yu, Chuanjun Dai, and Min Zhao. “The Dynamical Behavior of a Certain Predator–Prey System with Holling Type II Functional Response”. In: Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics 8.3 (2020). doi: 10.4236/jamp.2020.83042.

[14] Davina Alma Fitri and Dian Savitri. “Prey predator Model with Holling Type II Functional Response and Hunting Cooperation of Predators”. In: MATHunesa: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika 12.3 (2024), pp. 637–645. doi: 10.26740/mathunesa.v12n3.p637-645.

[15] Patrick H. Crowley and Elizabeth K. Martin. “Functional responses and interference within and between year classes of a dragonfly population”. In: Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8.3 (1989), pp. 211–221. doi: 10.2307/1467324.

[16] John R. Beddington. “Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency”. In: Journal of Animal Ecology 44.1 (1975), pp. 331–340. doi: 10.2307/3866.

[17] Rana D. Parshad, Aladeen Basheer, Debaldey Jana, and Jai Prakash Tripathi. “Do prey handling predators really matter: Subtle effects of a Crowley–Martin functional response”. In: Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 103 (2017), pp. 410–421. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2017.06.027.

[18] Miswanto, Nur Suroiyah, and Windarto. “Model Predator–Prey Leslie-Gower dengan Respon Crowley-Martin dan Prey Terinfeksi serta Faktor Ketakutan”. In: Limits: Journal of Mathematics and Its Applications 20.3 (2023), pp. 331–342. doi: 10.12962/limits.v20i3.18530.

[19] Jawdat Alebraheem. “Predator Interference in a Predator–Prey Model with Mixed Functional and Numerical Responses”. In: Journal of Mathematics 2023 (2023), pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1155/2023/4349573.

[20] Jawdat Alebraheem. “Rich Dynamics of Seasonal Carrying Capacity Prey–Predator Models with Crowley–Martin Functional Response”. In: Mathematical and Computational Applications 30.1 (2025), p. 11. doi: 10.3390/mca30010011.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v11i1.40204

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Dian Savitri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office
Mathematics Department,
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144
Faximile (+62) 341 558933
e-mail: cauchy@uin-malang.ac.id

Creative Commons License
CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.