Higher-Order Numerical Solution of the KdV-BBM Equation: A Comparative Analysis of Temporal Integration Schemes in the Method of Lines Framework

Dita Ardiana, Ummu Habibah, Trisilowati Trisilowati, Rahifa Binti Ranom

Abstract


This study investigates the numerical simulation of solitary wave propagation governed by the KdV-BBM equation using a robust Method of Lines (MOL) framework. The governing nonlinear equation is transformed into a system of ordinary differential equations through spatial discretization, and the performance of three temporal integration schemes is evaluated: the first-order Euler method, the fourth-order Runge-Kutta (RK-4), and the fifth-order iRK-5 method. Quantitative analysis using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for various time steps (Δt = 0.2, 0.1, 0.05, and 0.01) reveals that the iRK-5 scheme provides enhanced temporal precision, achieving error magnitudes as low as 10−6 and consistently aligning with the exact traveling-wave solution. Notably, the iRK-5 method demonstrates greater algorithmic efficiency, achieving an accuracy level of 4.55 × 10−6 at a coarser time step of Δt = 0.1, whereas the RK-4 scheme requires a finer time step of Δt = 0.05 to reach the same precision. Both high-order methods eventually reach a spatial error floor where further temporal refinement yields no significant reduction in MAE, emphasizing that high-order temporal integration, particularly the iRK-5 scheme, is essential for preserving the physical integrity of complex nonlinear wave phenomena while maintaining optimal computational effort.


Keywords


Improved fifth-order Runge-Kutta (iRK-5); KdV-BBM equation; method of lines (MOL); solitary wave propagation

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] S. Inna, M. Manaqib, and I. Gifari, “Analysis of Korteweg-type compressible fluid model with slip boundary conditions in 3-dimensional half-space,” CAUCHY, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 270–286, Nov. 2024. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1872/1/012036.

[2] S. C. Mancas and R. Adams, “Elliptic solutions and solitary waves of a higher order KdV–BBM long wave equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 452, no. 2, pp. 1168–1181, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.03.057.

[3] R. Vana, P. Karunakar, and R. K. Davala, “Solitary wave solution of the KdV-BBM equation with triangular fuzzy number incorporation,” Engineering Computations, pp. 1–19, 2025. doi: 10.1108/EC-05-2025-0473.

[4] N. Hayashi and P. I. Naumkin, “Modified scattering for the higher-order KdV–BBM equations,” Journal of Pseudodifferential Operators and Applications, vol. 15, no. 1, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s11868-024-00588-0.

[5] A. Polwang, K. Poochinapan, and B. Wongsaijai, “Numerical simulation of wave flow: Integrating the BBM-KdV equation using compact difference schemes,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 236, pp. 70–89, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2025.03.012.

[6] T. Suebcharoen, K. Poochinapan, and B. Wongsaijai, “Bifurcation analysis and numerical study of wave solution for initial-boundary value problem of the KdV-BBM equation,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 20, p. 3825, 2022. doi: 10.3390/math10203825.

[7] D. E. Ratnasari, M. Pasaribu, M. Pasaribu, Y. Yudhi, and Y. Yudhi, “Application of the Saint-Venant model for simulation of the Kapuas River flow using the finite difference method,” CAUCHY, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 413–425, May 2026. doi: 10.18860/ca.v9i2.29048.

[8] W. E. Schiesser, The Numerical Method of Lines: Integration of Partial Differential Equations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1991. Available online.

[9] M. N. Mikhail, “On the validity and stability of the method of lines for the solution of partial differential equations,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 22, no. 2–3, pp. 89–98, 1987. doi: 10.1016/0096-3003(87)90038-5.

[10] M. Yaseen, M. A. Hamza, K. S. Mohamed, and N. Mohammed, “A method of lines scheme with third-order finite differences for Burgers–Huxley equation,” Axioms, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 158, 2026. doi: 10.3390/axioms15030158.

[11] U. Habibah, M. H. Tuloli, V. Rimanada, and T. G. Ferreira, “Penyelesaian numerik masalah syarat batas Robin pada persamaan diferensial Cauchy-Euler,” Majamath, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 32–40, Mar. 2020. doi: 10.36815/majamath.v3i1.615.

[12] K. O. F. Williams and B. F. Akers, “Numerical simulation of the Korteweg–de Vries equation with machine learning,” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 13, p. 2791, 2023. doi: 10.3390/math11132791.

[13] E. Hanert, D. Y. L. Roux, V. Legat, and E. Deleersnijder, “An efficient Eulerian finite element method for the shallow water equations,” Ocean Modelling, vol. 10, no. 1–2, pp. 115–136, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.06.006.

[14] Z. Kamont and J. Newlin-Łukowicz, “Generalized Euler method for nonlinear first-order partial differential equations,” Nonlinear Oscillations, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 444–462, 2003. doi: 10.1023/B:NONO.0000028584.03014.72.

[15] H. Mingyou and V. Thomée, “On the backward Euler method for parabolic equations with rough initial data,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 599–603, 1982. doi: 10.1137/0719040.

[16] S. Karthick, R. Mahendran, and V. Subburayan, “Method of lines and Runge-Kutta method for solving delayed one dimensional transport equation,” Journal of Mathematical and Computational Science, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 270–280, 2022. doi: 10.22436/jmcs.028.03.05.

[17] A. Sarma, T. W. Watts, M. Moosa, Y. Liu, and P. L. McMahon, “Quantum variational solving of nonlinear and multidimensional partial differential equations,” Physical Review A, vol. 109, no. 6, 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.109.062616.

[18] M. Sukron, U. Habibah, and N. Hidayat, “Numerical solution of Saint-Venant equation using Runge-Kutta fourth-order method,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1872, no. 1, p. 012036, May 2021. doi: 10.18860/cauchy.v11i1.38622.

[19] Y. Huang, G. Peng, G. Zhang, and H. Zhang, “High-order Runge–Kutta structure-preserving methods for the coupled nonlinear Schrödinger–KdV equations,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 208, pp. 603–618, Jun. 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2023.01.031.

[20] U. Habibah, F. F. Medrano, A. C. Permana, D. Ardiana, and Trisilowati, “An improved fifth-order Runge-Kutta method with higher accuracy and efficiency for solving initial value problems,” Science and Technology Indonesia, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 802–816, 2025. doi: 10.26554/sti.2025.10.3.802-816.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v11i1.41525

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Dita Ardiana, Ummu Habibah, Trisilowati -, Rahifa Binti Ranom

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office
Mathematics Department,
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144
Faximile (+62) 341 558933
e-mail: cauchy@uin-malang.ac.id

Creative Commons License
CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.