An Integrated Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy MCDM Framework with Radius Operators for Same-Day Delivery Service Selection

Dwi Nurkarimah, Noor Hidayat, Abdul Rouf Alghofari

Abstract


The rapid expansion of e-commerce has increased the demand for rapid, reliable, and efficient logistics services, particularly same-day delivery (SDD). Selecting SDD service providers is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem because it involves multiple evaluation criteria and expert judgments under uncertainty. This study develops a decision-making framework based on circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets (CIFS) for SDD service selection and evaluates the effect of different CIFS radius operators on ranking outcomes. The proposed methodology is implemented in a case study of SDD service selection in Malang, involving 30 experts, four criteria, and three alternatives. Expert evaluations are aggregated and analyzed using three radius operators: maximum Euclidean distance, radius algebraic product, and radius algebraic sum. A sensitivity analysis is also conducted over the full range of the parameter lambda. The results show that the radius algebraic product operator provides the most stable ranking, consistently producing (AL3 > AL2 > AL1). These findings indicate that the choice of CIFS radius operator significantly affects decision stability and supports more reliable recommendations.

Keywords


Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set; Logistics Service Selection; Multi-Criteria Decision Making; Radius Operator; Same-Day Delivery

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] Yulia Vakulenko, Jasenko Arsenovic, Daniel Hellström, and Poja Shams. “Does delivery service differentiation matter? Comparing rural to urban e-consumer satisfaction and retention”. Journal of Business Research 142 (2022), pp. 476–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.079.

[2] Yuki Oyama, Daisuke Fukuda, Naoto Imura, and Katsuhiro Nishinari. “Do people really want fast and precisely scheduled delivery? E-commerce customers’ valuations of home delivery timing”. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 78 (2024), p. 103711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103711.

[3] Md. Uzir Hossain Uzir et al. “The effects of service quality, perceived value and trust in home delivery service personnel on customer satisfaction: Evidence from a developing country”. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 63 (2021), p. 102721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102721.

[4] Xinwei Chen, Tong Wang, Barrett W. Thomas, and Marlin W. Ulmer. “Same-day delivery with fair customer service”. European Journal of Operational Research 308.2 (2023), pp. 738–751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.12.009.

[5] Thomas L. Saaty. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process: The Organization and Prioritization of Complexity. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications, 1996. URL: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=MGpaAAAAYAAJ.

[6] B. Nila and Jagannath Roy. “A new hybrid MCDM framework for third-party logistics provider selection under sustainability perspectives”. Expert Systems with Applications 234 (2023), p. 121009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121009.

[7] Ömer Faruk Görçün, Prasenjit Chatterjee, Željko Stević, and Hande Küçükönder. “An integrated model for road freight transport firm selection in third-party logistics using T-spherical fuzzy sets”. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 186 (2024), p. 103542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103542.

[8] Yayi Yuan, Zeshui Xu, and Yixin Zhang. “The DEMATEL–COPRAS hybrid method under probabilistic linguistic environment and its application in Third Party Logistics provider selection”. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 21.1 (2022), pp. 137–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-021-09358-9.

[9] Lotfi A. Zadeh. “Fuzzy sets”. Information and Control 8.3 (1965), pp. 338–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.

[10] Krassimir T. Atanassov. “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20.1 (1986), pp. 87–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3.

[11] Krassimir T. Atanassov. “Circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets”. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 39.5 (2020), pp. 5981–5986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189072.

[12] Nasser Aedh Alreshidi, Zahir Shah, and Muhammad Jabir Khan. “Similarity and entropy measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets”. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 131 (2024), p. 107786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107786.

[13] Esra Çakır and Mehmet Ali Taş. “Circular intuitionistic fuzzy decision making and its application”. Expert Systems with Applications (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120076.

[14] Sana Shahab et al. “Promoting Tailored Hotel Recommendations Based on Traveller Preferences: A Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Support Model”. CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences 143.2 (2025), pp. 2155–2183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2025.064553.

[15] İrem Otay and Cengiz Kahraman. “A novel circular intuitionistic fuzzy AHP&VIKOR methodology: An application to a multi-expert supplier evaluation problem”. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences 28.1 (2022), pp. 194–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2021.90023.

[16] Binyamin Yusoff, Dian Pratama, Adem Kilicman, and Lazim Abdullah. “Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy ELECTRE III Model for Group Decision Analysis”. Informatica 34.4 (2023), pp. 881–908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/23-INFOR536.

[17] Mahmut Can Bozyiğit and Mehmet Ünver. “Parametric circular intuitionistic fuzzy information measures and multi-criteria decision making with extended TOPSIS”. Granular Computing (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-024-00469-3.

[18] Dian Pratama, Binyamin Yusoff, Lazim Abdullah, Adem Kilicman, and Nor Hanimah Kamis. “Extension operators of circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets with triangular norms and conorms: Exploring a domain radius”. AIMS Mathematics 9.5 (2024), pp. 12259–12286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024599.

[19] N. Alkan and C. Kahraman. “Circular intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method: Pandemic hospital location selection”. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 42.1 (2024), pp. 295–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-219193.

[20] Chia-Nan Wang, Thi-Be-Oanh-Cao, Thanh-Tuan Dang, and Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen. “Third-Party Logistics Provider Selection in the Industry 4.0 Era by Using a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy MARCOS Methodology”. IEEE Access 12 (2024), pp. 67291–67313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3392892.

[21] Zeshui Xu. “Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators”. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 15.6 (2007), pp. 1179–1187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.890678.

[22] Shu-Jen Chen and Ching-Lai Hwang. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Vol. 375. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4.

[23] D. H. Hong and C.-H. Choi. “Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114.1 (2000), pp. 103–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00271-1.

[24] Esra Çakır and Mehmet Ali Taş. “Circular intuitionistic fuzzy decision making and its application”. Expert Systems with Applications 225 (2023), p. 120076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120076.

[25] Y. Li, C. Archetti, and I. Ljubić. “Emerging optimization problems for distribution in same-day delivery”. Computers & Operations Research 182 (2025), p. 107105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2025.107105.

[26] Ali Ahmed, Amit Deokar, Ho Cheung Brian Lee, and Nichalin Summerfield. “The role of commitment in online reputation systems: An empirical study of express delivery promise in an e-commerce platform”. Decision Support Systems 176 (2024), p. 114061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2023.114061.

[27] Delphine Caruelle, Line Lervik-Olsen, and Anders Gustafsson. “The clock is ticking—Or is it? Customer satisfaction response to waiting shorter vs. longer than expected during a service encounter”. Journal of Retailing 99.2 (2023), pp. 247–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2023.03.003.

[28] Hossein Fotouhi and Elise Miller-Hooks. “Same-day delivery time-guarantee problem in online retail”. Communications in Transportation Research 3 (2023), p. 100105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2023.100105.

[29] Yannick Oskar Scherr, Margaretha Gansterer, and Richard F. Hartl. “Request acceptance with overbooking in dynamic and collaborative vehicle routing”. European Journal of Operational Research 314.2 (2024), pp. 612–629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.10.014.

[30] Jintao Ke, Ce Wang, Xinwei Li, Qiong Tian, and Hai-Jun Huang. “Equilibrium analysis for on-demand food delivery markets”. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 184 (2024), p. 103467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103467.

[31] Quynh Huong Do, Thai Young Kim, and Xueqin Wang. “Effects of logistics service quality and price fairness on customer repurchase intention: The moderating role of cross-border e-commerce experiences”. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 70 (2023), p. 103165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103165.

[32] Petri Helo and Vinh V. Thai. “Logistics 4.0 – digital transformation with smart connected tracking and tracing devices”. International Journal of Production Economics 275 (2024), p. 109336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109336.

[33] Baozhuang Niu, Lingfeng Wang, Yiyuan Ruan, et al. “The bright and dark sides of real-time delivery tracking in cross-border e-commerce”. Annals of Operations Research (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-025-06808-0.

[34] John Olsson, Daniel Hellström, and Yulia Vakulenko. “Customer experience dimensions in last-mile delivery: An empirical study on unattended home delivery”. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 53.2 (2023), pp. 184–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2021-0517.

[35] Detcharat Sumrit and Khanwara Sowijit. “Winning customer satisfaction toward omnichannel logistics service quality based on an integrated importance-performance analysis and three-factor theory: Insight from Thailand”. Asia Pacific Management Review 28.4 (2023), pp. 531–543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.03.003.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v11i1.42211

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Nurkarimah, Noor Hidayat, Abdul Rouf Alghofari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office
Mathematics Department,
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144
Faximile (+62) 341 558933
e-mail: cauchy@uin-malang.ac.id

Creative Commons License
CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.