Copula Regression for Deductible--Claim Dependence in Non-Life Insurance: A Stratified Evaluation

Dwi Mifta Mahanani, Feby Indriana Yusuf, Dzaki Ferlian Nugroho, Tuti Sariningsih Budi Utami

Abstract


Deductible choice may be statistically associated with claim outcomes after observed rating variables have been taken into account. The contractual deductible is distinguished from the normalized deductible ratio used as the continuous working margin, while claim count remains discrete and individual severity remains continuous. A Canonical Vine pair-copula construction links the deductible ratio, claim frequency, and individual claim severity. The application uses 1,038 entities from the Wisconsin Local Government Property Insurance Fund observed from 2006 to 2010; models are estimated on 2006-2009 data and evaluated on the 2010 temporal holdout. The estimated dependence is negative for deductible-frequency, positive for deductible observed severity, and negative for frequency-severity conditional on the deductible. These patterns are interpreted as conditional associations that may be consistent with selection and claim-reporting mechanisms, rather than as causal evidence of adverse selection or moral hazard. The dependence model attains a higher observation-level logarithmic score than the exogenous-deductible benchmark for 64.55% of frequency observations and 71.09% of severity observations. Its global Insurance Gini  improvement is 22.54 points, with positive point estimates across all five deductible strata but greater uncertainty in the highest-deductible group. The results show that deductible information can improve out of sample risk discrimination, while also demonstrating the importance of support assumptions, benchmark definitions, and cautious behavioral interpretation.

Keywords


Canonical Vine; compound distribution; copula regression; endogenous deductible; non-life insurance.

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] P.-A. Chiappori and B. Salanié, “Testing for asymmetric information in insurance markets,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 56–78, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/262111.

[2] A. Cohen and P. Siegelman, “Testing for adverse selection in insurance markets,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 39–84, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2009.01337.x.

[3] E. W. Frees, G. Lee, and L. Yang, “Multivariate frequency–severity regression models in insurance,” Risks, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 4, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks4010004.

[4] G. Y. Lee and P. Shi, “A dependent frequency–severity approach to modeling longitudinal insurance claims,” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, vol. 87, pp. 115–129, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.04.004.

[5] P. Shi and Z. Zhao, “Regression for copula-linked compound distributions with applications in modeling aggregate insurance claims,” The Annals of Applied Statistics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 357–380, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/19-AOAS1299.

[6] K. Aas, C. Czado, A. Frigessi, and H. Bakken, “Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence,” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 182–198, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.02.001.

[7] P. Shi and L. Yang, “Pair copula constructions for insurance experience rating,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 113, no. 521, pp. 122–133, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1330692.

[8] L. Yang, E. W. Frees, and Z. Zhang, “Nonparametric estimation of copula regression models with discrete outcomes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 115, no. 530, pp. 707–720, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2018.1546586.

[9] P. Shi and G. Y. Lee, “Copula regression for compound distributions with endogenous covariates with applications in insurance deductible pricing,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 117, no. 539, pp. 1094–1109, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2022.2040519.

[10] P. Shi and W. Zhang, “A copula-based panel data model for pricing insurance contracts with endogenous deductibles,” The Econometrics Journal, art. no. utag018, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utag018.

[11] C. Genest and J. Nešlehová, “A primer on copulas for count data,” ASTIN Bulletin, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 475–515, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/AST.37.2.2024077.

[12] W. K. Newey and D. McFadden, “Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing,” in Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 4, R. F. Engle and D. L. McFadden, Eds. Elsevier, 1994, pp. 2111–2245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4412(05)80006-4.

[13] T. Gneiting and A. E. Raftery, “Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 102, no. 477, pp. 359–378, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000001437.

[14] C. Czado, T. Gneiting, and L. Held, “Predictive model assessment for count data,” Biometrics, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1254–1261, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01191.x.

[15] J.-P. Boucher, M. Denuit, and M. Guillén, “Number of accidents or number of claims? An approach with zero-inflated Poisson models for panel data,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 821–846, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2009.01321.x.

[16] E. W. Frees, G. Meyers, and A. D. Cummings, “Summarizing insurance scores using a Gini index,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 106, no. 495, pp. 1085–1098, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.tm10506.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v11i2.43524

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 FEBY INDRIANA YUSUF, Dwi Mifta Mahanani, Dzaki Ferlian Nugroho

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office
Mathematics Department,
Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University of Malang
Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144
e-mail: cauchy@uin-malang.ac.id

Creative Commons License
CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.