Sobol and GJR-GARCH for Dominant Factors of European Option Prices in Blue-Chip Index Constituent Stocks
Abstract
Conditional volatility-based option pricing research generally emphasizes improving volatility inputs, but has not yet fully explained the relative contribution of each parameter to variation in simulated option-pricing responses for Indonesian index stocks. This study integrates Black–Scholes, GJR-GARCH asymmetric volatility, and Sobol global sensitivity analysis to identify dominant factors in a model-generated European call-option response for verified constituents of an Indonesian blue-chip index, denoted Index X. The sample consists of 19 constituents that remained consistent from February 2022 to December 2025. Logarithmic returns are tested for stationarity and ARCH effects, conditional volatility is estimated using GJR-GARCH(1,1), and the Black–Scholes response is evaluated with five independently and uniformly distributed inputs: moneyness, maturity, risk-free rate, volatility multiplier, and proportional transaction cost. The results show that all returns are stationary and most stocks exhibit significant ARCH effects. Under the baseline domain, maturity and moneyness are the leading factors, while the volatility multiplier is secondary and the risk-free rate and transaction cost have smaller contributions. The ranking remains contract-dominated under a wider scenario domain and under a Student-t innovation check, although the magnitudes and ordering of maturity and moneyness can change. The contribution of this research is sensitivity decomposition of a specified Black–Scholes response with a GJR-GARCH-based volatility input, not evidence of improved pricing accuracy against observed option prices. Issuer and index identities are masked in the manuscript to prevent issuer-specific model outputs from being misconstrued as investment recommendations or comparative assessments; a confidential identity crosswalk is retained for editorial verification.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Jean-Paul Chavas, Jian Li, and Linjie Wang. “Option Pricing Revisited: The Role of Price Volatility and Dynamics”. Journal of Commodity Markets 33 (2024), p. 100381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2023.100381.
[2] Yawei Wu. “Options Pricing Comparison between the Black–Scholes Model and the Binomial Tree Model: A Case Study of American Equity Option and European-style Index Option”. BCP Business & Management 32 (2022), pp. 168–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v32i.2885.
[3] Marcos Escobar-Anel, Javad Rastegari, and Lars Stentoft. “Option Pricing with Conditional GARCH Models”. European Journal of Operational Research 289.1 (2021), pp. 350–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.07.002.
[4] Dong Hwan Oh and Yang-Ho Park. “GARCH Option Pricing with Volatility Derivatives”. Journal of Banking & Finance 146 (2023), p. 106718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106718.
[5] Zheng Fang and Jae-Young Han. “Realized GARCH Model in Volatility Forecasting and Option Pricing”. Computational Economics 66.5 (2025), pp. 3637–3657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-024-10826-8.
[6] Tao Pang and Yang Zhao. “On GARCH and Autoregressive Stochastic Volatility Approaches for Market Calibration and Option Pricing”. Risks 13.2 (2025), p. 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13020031.
[7] Tianyi Wang, Sicong Cheng, Fangsheng Yin, and Mei Yu. “Overnight Volatility, Realized Volatility, and Option Pricing”. Journal of Futures Markets 42.7 (2022), pp. 1264–1283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22330.
[8] Xin-Jiang He and Sha Lin. “A Fractional Black–Scholes Model with Stochastic Volatility and European Option Pricing”. Expert Systems with Applications 178 (2021), p. 114983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114983.
[9] Fatimah Oktaviani and Emy Siswanah. “Option Pricing Using Modification of Black Scholes Merton Model with GJR-GARCH”. CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi 11.1 (2026), pp. 857–869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v11i1.37426.
[10] Difa Tazkya, Rini Oktavia, and Intan Syahrini. “The Trinomial Tree Method in Pricing European Gold Option with Volatility Forecasting Using the GARCH (1,1) Model”. ZERO: Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Terapan 9.1 (2025), p. 277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30829/zero.v9i1.25455.
[11] Xinya Li. “The Pricing of CSI 300 ETF Options with GJR-GARCH Model”. Operations Research and Fuzziology 14.1 (2024), pp. 846–855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2024.141078.
[12] Christophe Chorro and Rahantamialisoa H. Fanirisoa Zazaravaka. “Discriminating Between GARCH Models for Option Pricing by Their Ability to Compute Accurate VIX Measures”. Journal of Financial Econometrics 20.5 (2021), pp. 902–941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbaa042.
[13] Sarula Bai, Jaewon Jung, and Shun Li. “The Spillover Effects of Market Sentiments on Global Stock Market Volatility: A Multi-Country GJR-GARCH-MIDAS Approach”. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 17.12 (2024), p. 569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17120569.
[14] Anggas Arden Arya Satya and Mahatir Muhammad. “Volatility Drivers in Islamic Stock Markets: The Case of IDX30 Index Firms in Indonesia”. ITQAN: Journal of Islamic Economics, Management, and Finance 5.1 (2026), pp. 94–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57053/itqan.v5i1.151.
[15] Siti Maysaroh and Anita Handayani. “Leverage, Dividend Policy, and Profitability Effects on IDX30 Stock Price Volatility During 2019–2023”. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan 13.2 (2025), pp. 1051–1060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i2.3159.
[16] Sidiq Nuriksan and Nikmah. “Financial News Sentiment and Investor Confidence: Determinants of Stock Price Volatility in IDX30”. Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Business (JHSSB) 4.3 (2025), pp. 493–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55047/jhssb.v4i3.1648.
[17] Dery Westryananda Putra, Sri Hasnawati, and Muslimin. “Ramadan Effect and Volatility Risk by GARCH Model: Evidence in Indonesia Stock Market”. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen 17.2 (2021), pp. 73–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jbm.v17i2.220.
[18] I Made Adhi Dharmaningrat, Helena Margaretha, and Kie Van Ivanky Saputra. “Predicting the Volatility of Jakarta Composite Index Using GARCH and LSTM with Volume-Up Strategy Approach”. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence 11.3 (2025), pp. 311–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jisebi.11.3.311-322.
[19] Stefano Scoleri, Marco Bianchetti, and Sergei Kucherenko. “Application of Quasi Monte Carlo and Global Sensitivity Analysis to Option Pricing and Greeks: Finite Differences vs. AAD”. Wilmott 2021.116 (2021), pp. 66–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wilm.10972.
[20] Yin Gao and Miao Tian. “Pricing Problem and Sensitivity Analysis of Knock-in External Barrier Options Based on Uncertain Stock Model”. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 187 (2024), p. 115356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115356.
[21] Xifu Sun, Barry Croke, Stephen Roberts, and Anthony Jakeman. “Investigation of Determinism-Related Issues in the Sobol Low-Discrepancy Sequence for Producing Sound Global Sensitivity Analysis Indices”. ANZIAM Journal 62 (2021), pp. C84–C97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21914/anziamj.v62.16094.
[22] Maarten Arnst, Christian Soize, and Kevin Bulthuis. “Computation of Sobol Indices in Global Sensitivity Analysis from Small Data Sets by Probabilistic Learning on Manifolds”. International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification 11.2 (2021), pp. 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2020032674.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v11i2.45307
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Nathania Azzah Mu’azara, Rudianto Artiono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Editorial Office
Mathematics Department,
Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University of Malang
Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144
e-mail: cauchy@uin-malang.ac.id

CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







