Modified Black-Scholes Model for Valuing Employee Stock Options with Constant Exit Rate: A Case Study of a Banking Company in Indonesia

Permadi Yulianto, Rudianto Artiono

Abstract


Employee Stock Options (ESO) are a form of compensation given to employees in the form of shares that can be purchased within a specified period. The ESO valuation uses the Black Scholes model, assuming employees remain employed until the vesting period is completed, excluding the employee’s departure from the company before the option rights are exercised. This study aims to determine the value of Employee Stock Options (ESO) by adding a constant exit rate factor. The data from this study are the closing price at BANK XYZ for the calculation of Volatility, for the risk-free interest rate from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis used to calculate the option value using the Black-Scholes model, adjusted for the probability of continued employment (survival probability) obtained from various constant exit rate values. The results of the study using the constant exit rate produce a lower Employee Stock Option value than the calculation using the standard Black-Scholes model. The decline is greater with increasing maturity time because the employee’s probability of remaining employed at the company decreases. By applying a constant exit rate, the assessment results better reflect the real conditions compared to the Black-Scholes model, which does not consider the risk of employee departure from the company

Keywords


Employee Stock Options; Black-Scholes Model; Constant Exit Rate; Volatility; Banking Companies

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] B. Rusianto and K. Khasmir. “The Impact of Competence and HR Quality on Organizational Performance with Motivation as an Intervening Variable at Bank Indonesia”. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science 4.6 (2023), pp. 1919–1926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i6.940.

[2] Andrew Pendleton and Andrew Robinson. “Employee behavior in employee stock option plans: Why do some employees acquire company stock?” Human Resource Management 62.2 (2023), pp. 197–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22139.

[3] Qiaoqiao Li and Hong Zhang. “The Causal Effect of Option Ownership on Employee Performance: Empirical Evidence from Personnel Data”. Labour Economics 69 (2021), p. 101966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2021.101966.

[4] Camil Ciprian Cirnu. “Evaluating the Financial Implications of Employee Stock Option Plans: Costs and Benefits for Financial Institutions”. Revista de Studii Financiare 10.19 (2025), pp. 197–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55654/JFS.2025.10.19.12.

[5] Shintya Nafitri Hayuningrum and Rudianto Artiono. “Pemodelan Matematika Opsi Saham Karyawan Menggunakan Metode Binomial Enhanced American”. MATHunesa: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika 11.2 (2023), pp. 186–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/mathunesa.v11n2.p186-191.

[6] Rudianto Artiono and Dayat Hidayat. “Binomial Approach for the Valuation of Employee Stock Option with Some Features: Vesting Period, Exit Rate, Reload, and Reset”. E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 328, EDP Sciences, 2021, p. 06006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202132806006.

[7] Tim Leung and Yang Zhou. “A Top-Down Approach for the Multiple Exercises and Valuation of Employee Stock Options”. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 23.2 (2020), p. 2050004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219024920500041.

[8] Qing Gong, Hong Zhang, and Li-An Zhou. “Retention Effects of Employee Stock Options: Evidence from Bunching at Vesting Dates”. Economic Development and Cultural Change 74.3 (2026), pp. 777–816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/737154.

[9] Tim Leung and Ronnie Sircar. “Accounting for Risk Aversion, Vesting, Job Termination Risk and Multiple Exercises in Valuation of Employee Stock Options”. Mathematical Finance 19.1 (2009), pp. 99–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9965.2008.00359.x.

[10] Louis P. Le Guyader and Thomas O. Meyer. “Employee Stock Options and the Flawed Use of the Black–Scholes Option Pricing Model”. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance 32.1 (2021), pp. 7–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22456.

[11] Fischer Black and Myron S. Scholes. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities”. Journal of Political Economy 81.3 (1973), pp. 637–654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260062.

[12] Ilona Babenko, Fangfang Du, and Yuri Tserlukevich. “Will I Get Paid? Employee Stock Options and Mergers and Acquisitions”. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 56.1 (2021), pp. 29–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109020000022.

[13] Jennifer N. Carpenter. “The Exercise and Valuation of Executive Stock Options”. Journal of Financial Economics 48.2 (1998), pp. 127–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00006-3.

[14] Kamil Kladivko and Mihail Zervos. “Valuation of Employee Stock Options (ESOs) by Means of Mean-Variance Hedging”. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.00897 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1710.00897. arXiv: 1710.00897 [q-fin.PR].

[15] Andrew Pendleton and Andrew Robinson. “Why Walk Away from an Easy Gain in Wealth? Evidence from a UK Stock Option Plan”. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 31 (2021), p. 100539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100539.

[16] Jennifer N. Carpenter, Richard Stanton, and Nancy Wallace. “Employee Stock Option Exercise and Firm Cost”. The Journal of Finance 74.3 (2019), pp. 1175–1216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12752.

[17] John Hull and Alan White. “How to Value Employee Stock Options”. Financial Analysts Journal 60.1 (2004), pp. 114–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v60.n1.2596.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v11i2.45561

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Permadi Yulianto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office
Mathematics Department,
Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University of Malang
Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144
e-mail: cauchy@uin-malang.ac.id

Creative Commons License
CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.