REASON, EXPERIENCE, AND LANGUAGE TO ACQUIRE KNOWLEDGE (IN WESTERN AND ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVES)

Mudjia Rahardjo

Abstract


The system of knowledge acquisition is one of the most important topics in philosophical debates since ancient Greek. According to the Western philosophical worldview, as the universally accepted method, there are two schools of thought to acquire proper knowledge; rationalism and empiricism. Rationalism assumes that sound reason is the main human potential to acquire knowledge that constitutes a priori knowledge, while empiricism relies on sensory abilities constituting a posteriori or empirical knowledge. In addition, Islam offers intuition or instinct as another source of knowledge that creates intuitive knowledge, be it empirical or spiritual. The knowledge gained is then developed through language symbols, from being personal to finally public knowledge. Through language, knowledge is inherited from one generation to the next. However, due to its limitations, language is not able to symbolize all types of knowledge. Consequently, there are two kinds of knowledge; articulated (explicit) knowledge and unarticulated (tacit) knowledge. Nevertheless, despite their sharp differences, both the Western and Islamic worldviews assume that knowledge acquisition is the field of a speculative philosophical endeavor which is hard to get a satisfying answer, though it is not impossible.

Keywords


knowledge, reason, experience, rationalism, empiricism, intuition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Attas, M. N. (2010). Knowledge, Language, Thought, and the Civilization of Islam: Essays in Honor of Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. UTM Press.

Az-Zuhaili, W. (2002). Al Qur’an Menjawab Tantangan Zaman. (Transl. Syarif Hade Masyah & Ali Efendi Anshori). Jakarta: Mustaqim.

Bartolotti, L. (2008). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Derksen, L. and Gartell, J. (2006). Scientific Explanation in Borgotta, E. F. and Montgomery, R. J. V. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Sociology, Volume 4.Qualitative Methods to Sociolinguistics. New York: Macmillan Reference.

Ewing, A. C. (1951). Criticism of the Linguistic Theory of the A Priori. in Fundamental Questions of Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan.

Hardiman, F. B. (1994). Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dalam Diskursus Modernisme dan Pasca-Modernisme. Ulumul Qur’an: Jurnal Ilmu dan Kebudayaan, 1(5).

Muadz, M. H. (2013). Anatomi Sistem Sosial: RekonstruksiNormalitas Relasi Intersubyektivitas-Rekognitif dengan Pendekatan Sistem. Mataram: Institut Pembelajaran Gelar Hidup.

Muhadjir, N. (2007). Metodologi Keilmuan: Paradigma Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed.Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.

Okasha, S. (2002). Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: University Press.

Jah, O. (2010). Al-Balagh. In Wan Moh Nor Wan Daud & Muhamamad Zainy Uthman (Eds.). Knowledge, Language, Thought and the Civilization of Islam. Essays in Honour of Syed Muhammad Naquib al- Attas. Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Pateda, M. (2001). Semantik Leksikal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. (second edition). London: Sage Publications.

Poedjawijatna, I.R. (2004). Logika Filsafat Berpikir. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Popper, K. R. (1961). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Science Editions, Inc.

Riyanto, F. E. A. (2018). Mendesain Riset Filosofis – Fenomenologis dalam Rangka Mengembangkan “Berfilsafat Indonesia”. In Yustinus, A. T. R. (Ed.). Metodologi Riset Studi Filsafat Teologi. Malang: Dioma.

Riyanto, F. E. A. (2018). Relasionalitas: Filsafat Fondasi Interpretasi: Aku, Teks, Liyan, Fenomen. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Riyanto, F. E. A. (2018). Tradisi Riset Studi Widya Sasana (1971-2000): Membangun Integrasi-Kontekstualisasi Filsafat Teologi”. In Yustinus, A. T. R. (Ed.). Metodologi Riset Studi Filsafat Teologi. Malang: Dioma.

Soekadijo, R.G. (1999). Logika Dasar. Tradisional, simbolik, dan induktif. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Sumarna, C. (2005). Rekonstruksi Ilmu: dari Empirik-Rasional Ateistik ke Empirik-Rasional Teistik. Bandung: Benang Merah Press.

Tarigan, H. G. (1992). Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Metode Riset Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Bahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Taylor, Charles, P and Wallace, J. (Eds.). (2007).Qualitative Research in Postmodern Times. Exemplars for Science, Mathematics, and Technology. Dordrecht: Springer.

Wagdid, Y. (2010). Reflections on Al-Attas' Conception of the Islamic University in Daud, W.N.M.W. & Uthman, M. Z. (Eds.). Knowledge, Language, Thought and the Civilization of Islam: Essays in Honour of Syed Muhammad Naquib al- Attas. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Watlolly, A. (2001). Tanggung Jawab Pengetahuan.Mempertimbangkan Epistemologi secara Kultural. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Wuisman J,J,J. M. (1996). Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial: Asas-asas. Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Zarkasyi, H. F. (2010). Al-Ghazali’s Concept of Causality: with reference to His Interpretations of Reality and Knowledge. Malaysia: IIUM Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v16i1.12629



Copyright (c) 2021 LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Member of:

Crossref

Indexed by:

Dimension Google Scolar  Sinta Sinta   Journal TOCS     

Editorial Office:
Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Email: jurnallingua@gmail.com
Phone: +62 (0)341 570872


Creative Commons License
LiNGUA by Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/humbud/index.