A COMPARATIVE LINGUISTIC STUDY OF MONASTIC SOCIAL MEDIA INFLUENCERS IN CHINA AND THAILAND

Yu Fa, Metteya Beliatte, Wahyu Indah Mala Rohmana, Langgeng Budianto

Abstract


Advancements in media technology have significantly reshaped the sharing and consumption of religious teachings, especially as Buddhist monks increasingly use social media platforms like Weibo in China and Facebook in Thailand to preach and engage with their followers. Some monks have gained considerable influence on these platforms, attracting large followings. While previous studies have noted the growing presence of monks on social media, their specific behaviors and strategies have not been extensively explored. This study addresses this gap by examining the practices of Buddhist monks in China, which is home to around 80% of the global Buddhist population, and Thailand, where approximately 93-94% of the population practices Theravada Buddhism. Using a qualitative content analysis approach, the study analyzes the posts of eight prominent monk influencers—four from each country—between January 2017 and December 2019. The research findings reveal key differences in the content and strategies employed by Chinese and Thai monks. Chinese monks, such as Ven. Yancan, tend to share content related to their daily lives, social interactions, and public service activities, positioning themselves as social activists. In contrast, Thai monks primarily focus on Buddhist teachings, practices, and rituals, with less emphasis on secular topics. Additionally, Chinese monks are more likely to use multimedia formats, such as videos and live streaming, for real-time engagement, while Thai monks prefer textual content and speeches, focusing on delivering sermons and reflections. Public service activities also vary, with Chinese monks organizing large-scale charity events, such as donations and educational initiatives, while Thai monks engage in smaller, more localized acts of service, like offering food and aid to the community. These differences highlight the influence of cultural and political contexts, such as China's strict policy regulations and Thailand's structured monastic oversight. The study underscores how social media has expanded the reach of Buddhist teachings, allowing monks to transcend geographical boundaries and challenge traditional religious hierarchies. By adapting to new media, Buddhist monks are able to connect with younger, digitally engaged audiences and remain relevant in an increasingly digital world, offering valuable insights into the evolving landscape of religious communication in the digital age.

Keywords


Buddhism; social media; monk influencers; comparative study; China; Thailand; religious communication;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agarwal, R., & Jones, W. J. (2022). Social media’s role in the changing religious landscape of contemporary Bangkok. Religions, 13(5), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050421

Brubaker, P. J., & Haigh, M. M. (2017). The Religious facebook experience: Uses and gratifications of faith-based content. Social Media + Society, 3(2),1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117703723

Budiyanto & Taridi. (2021). The impact of Pandita training on the skill of performing Buddhist rituals. Smaratungga: Jurnal ofEducation andBuddhist Studies, 1(2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.53417/sjebs.v1i2.57

Chen, L. (2021). The development of Buddhism’s Sinicization in the new media era—Taking the use of new media in buddhist monasteries as an example. The Journal of Nanchang Normal College (Social Science), 4, 137–140. (Cannot find the original article)

Fan, W. (2015). A preliminary exploration of the Weibo communication of contemporary Buddhist culture:Taking Ven. Yancan’s Weibo as an example. News World, 7, 267–268. (Cant find the original article)

Feldstein, S. (2021). The rise of digital repression: How technology is reshaping power, politics, and resistance. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190057497.001.0001

Feng, J. (2019). Social media and contemporary Chinese Lay Buddhists’ practice. Journalism, 12, 58–71. (Cannot find the original article)

Grieve, G. P., & Veidlinger, D. M. (Eds.). (2018). Buddhism, the internet, and digital media: The pixel in the lotus (First issued in paperback). Routledge.

Huang, K., & Li, B. (2011). The new media landscape of contemporary Buddhist communication. Modern Communication, 2, 159–160. (Cannot find the original article)

Jin, S. V., & Ryu, E. (2022). “The greedy I that gives”—The paradox of egocentrism and altruism: Terror management and system justification perspectives on the interrelationship between mortality salience and charitable donations amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 56(1), 414–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12381

Jitsaeng, K., & Tuamsuk, K. (2022). Digital factors influencing the use of social media in political communication among Thai youths. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 7(2), 450-462. https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2022.2.450

Kaplan, A. M. (2015). Social media, the digital revolution, and the business of media. International Journal on Media Management, 17(4), 197–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2015.1120014

Yan, L. H., & Fan, D. C. (2019). On the phenomenon of “Circle-stratification” of Buddhist cultural network Dissemination. Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Science(Social Science Edition), (3), 56–61. volume number not found

Li, Q. (2018). Buddhism in the new media era: The popularity of Ven. Yancan as an example. Western Radio and Television, 8, 34–37. (Cannot find the original article)

Lu, M., & Ma, Q. (2022). The Effect of mobile social media sharing behavior on the subjective well-being and mental health regulation of internet users. Occupational Therapy International, , 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7573322 (Cannot find volume and issue number)

Obar, J. A., & Wildman, S. S. (2015). Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue. SSRN Electronic Journal, 39(9), 745-750.https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2647377

Ren, Y. (2012). A preliminary exploration of the characteristics and effects of contemporary Buddhist Microblogs—An analysis of Ven. Xuecheng’s Weibo as an example. Journal of Yichun College, 10, 51–55. (Cannot find the original article)

Schedneck, B. (2021). Everyday scandals: Regulating the Buddhist monastic body in Thai media. TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 10(2),1-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2021.11

Shi, J. (2017, 2019). SHI Jiqun’s Chinese Facebook page [Number of blog posts published during the specified time period]. https:// www.facebook.com/jiqunfashi/

Vala, C., & Huang, J. (2019). Online and offline religion in China: A protestant WeChat “Alter-Public” through the bible handcopying movement. Religions, 10(10),1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10100561

Wang, D., Tang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). National identity and public-welfare behavior among Chinese adolescents: A mediated moderation model. European Journal of Psychology Open, 82(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1024/2673-8627/a000036

Xu, S., & Campbell, H. A. (2020). The internet usage of religious organizations in Mainland China: Case analysis of the Buddhist association of China. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(2), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.215

Yiengprugsawan, V., Seubsman, S., & Sleigh, A. C. (2010). Health, well-being, and social indicators among monks, prisoners, and other adult members of an open university cohort in Thailand. Journal of Religion and Health, 51(3),925-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-010-9410-3

Zhang, Y. (2017). Digital religion in China: A comparative perspective on Buddhism and Christianity’s online publics in Sina Weibo. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 6(1), 44-67. https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-90000095

Zhou, D., & Wang, X. (2016). Weakening and new changes of classical communication theory in the context of internet information. Library Studies, 18, 93–97

Laliberté, A. (2024). ‘Buddhism(s) for this world’and ‘engaged Buddhism’: Some key differences. Journal of Social Innovation and Knowledge, 1-21. 10.1163/29502683-20241003





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v19i2.26284



Copyright (c) 2025 LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Member of:

Crossref

Indexed by:

Dimension Google Scolar  Sinta Sinta   Journal TOCS     

Editorial Office:
Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Email: jurnallingua@gmail.com
Phone: +62 (0)341 570872


Creative Commons License
LiNGUA by Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/humbud/index.