CROSS-CULTURAL PRAGMATICS OF INDONESIAN SPEECH ACTS BY FILIPINO YOUTUBE CONTENT CREATOR

Abdul Ghafur, Yunisrina Qismullah Yusuf, Mohd. Harun, Ramli Ramli, Denni Iskandar

Abstract


In Indonesian digital space, recently, there has been a noticeable increase in Filipino gaming content creators speaking in Indonesian. This phenomenon is interesting because it shows that the digital platforms have become key spaces for intercultural communication, identity expression, and language interaction in modern society. However, research on Indonesian speech acts used by foreign speakers, particularly Filipino content creators, is still very limited. Therefore, this study aims to examine how Filipino content creators perform Indonesian speech acts in digital communication. Several Indonesians and Filipinos creators, who is communicating in the digital space, were selected as the data source due to their high audience engagement and consistent use of Indonesian in digital communication. Such communication practice makes them appropriate representatives of cross-cultural language practices in online environments. Through a qualitative analysis, the specific eight hours of video data were transcribed and categorized according to Austin and Searle’s speech act framework (locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary). Such categorization is displayed into tables to identify patterns of use. This systematic analytical procedure enhances interpretive reliability and reveals recurring pragmatic patterns within naturally occurring discourse. The study identified a total of 97 speech acts produced by Filipino content creators. The analysis shows that Filipino content creators tend to use illocutionary speech acts with harsher language and a sarcastic style. Furthermore, content creators also use locutionary acts that employ descriptive sentences and informal or casual language. Meanwhile, in perlocutionary acts, content creators generally receive positive responses from their audience, which is most likely influenced by the entertaining and light-hearted nature of their videos. These findings indicate that Filipino content creators, despite being non-native Indonesian speakers, demonstrate strong pragmatic awareness by strategically performing social actions, managing interpersonal relations, and sustaining audience engagement. Their speech reflects how digital contexts facilitate pragmatic experimentation, enabling second-language users to adapt linguistic resources to interactional goals such as persuasion, rapport-building, and identity construction. This study contributes to the development of cross-cultural pragmatic studies and can serve as a reference for teaching Indonesian as a foreign language in the digital era by emphasizing the pedagogical value of authentic digital discourse in fostering learners’ pragmatic competence and intercultural communicative skills in real-world communication.

Keywords


content creator; Filipinos; Indonesian; Speech Act; social media;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, Y. (2019). Konsep dasar bahasa Indonesia [Basic concepts of the Indonesian language]. Bumi Aksara.

Ahmadi, A. (2019). Metode penelitian sastra [Literary research methods]. Penerbit Graniti.

Arjulayana, A. (2018). Bilingualism: Diglossia and code-switching to Indonesian scholars. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 1(3), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v1i3.4840

Astutin, L., Auzar, A., & Sinaga, M. (2022). Tindak tutur representatif dalam acara Talk Show Kick Andy pada kanal YouTube [Representative speech acts in the Talk Show Kick Andy on YouTube Channel]. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3), 11073–11079. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v5i3.2765

Austin, J. L. (1955). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Bakistuta, E. T., & Abduh, M. (2023). Dampak media sosial TikTok terhadap tindak tutur siswa Sekolah Dasar [The impact of TikTok social media on the speech acts of elementary school students]. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 6(3), 1201–1217. https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v6i3.6243

Bautista, M. L. S. (2004). Tagalog-English code switching as a mode of discourse. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5, 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024960

Byrd, V. L. (2021). Design activity worksheet: Identifying data sources for developing a research plan. Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1-7. IEEE Xplore. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.963718

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1

Damayanti, V. A., Permatasari, I. O., Zelig, K. B. Y., Pramana, H. R., & Utomo, A. P. Y. (2022). Analisis tindak tutur lokusi pada video pembelajaran di daftar putar “Bahasa” dari Channel Pahamify [Analysis of locutionary speech acts in educational videos from the “Language” playlist on the Pahamify Channel]. Jurnal Sinestesia, 12(2), 722–738. https://www.sinestesia.pustaka.my.id/journal/article/view/241/109

Dey, M. (2023). Four main characteristics of English pragmatics. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(2), 510-519. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6202

Fadilla, A. R., & Wulandari, P. A. (2023). Literature review analisis data kualitatif: Tahap pengumpulan data [Literature review of qualitative data analysis: The data collection stage]. Mitita Jurnal Penelitian, 1(3), 34-46.

Fitriah, F., & Fitriani, S. S. (2017). Analisis tindak tutur dalam novel Marwah di Ujung Bara karya RH Fitriadi [Speech act analysis in the novel Marwah di Ujung Bara by RH Fitriadi]. Master Bahasa, 5(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.24173/mb.v5i1.11078

Grosjean, F. (2012). Bilingual and monolingual language modes. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–9). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0090

Harras, K. A., & Bachari, A. D. (2022). Dasar-dasar psikolinguistik [Fundamentals of psycholinguistics]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Press.

Hikmawati, F. (2020). Metodologi penelitian [Research methods]. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Holtgraves, T. (2007). Second language learners and speech act comprehension. Language Learning, 57(4), 595-610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00429.x

Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Routledge.

Jeliati, D., Mualafina, R. F., & Kurniawan, L. A. (2022). Tindak tutur ekspresif pada episode “Vanessa Angel: Ini yang terjadi sebenarnya” dalam kanal YouTube Deddy Corbuzier [Expressive speech acts in the episode “Vanessa Angel: Ini yang Terjadi Sebenarnya” on Deddy Corbuzier’s YouTube Channel]. Seminar Nasional Literasi Prodi PBSI FPBS UPGRIS, 7(1), 167-173.

Jumanto, J. (2019). Constructing a children-friendly language within in-family interaction context. Alphabet, 2(2), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.alphabet.2019.02.02.02

Kolo, C., Roth, A., & Haumer, F. (2024). Social media influencers as content creators in the creative economy. Journal of Creative Industries and Cultural Studies, 11(2), 52-82. https://doi.org/10.56140/JOCIS-v11-6

Kushartanti, Yuwono, U., & Lauder, M. R. M. T. (2005). Pesona bahasa: Langkah awal memahami linguistik [The charm of language: A first step to understanding linguistics]. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Mahsun. (2012). Metode Penelitian Bahasa [Language research methods]. Rajawali Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd Ed.). SAGE Publications.

Muhson, A. (2006). Teknik Analisis Kuantitatif. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Mulyana. (2005). Kajian wacana: Teori, metode dan aplikasi prinsip-prinsip analisis wacana [Discourse studies: Theory, methods & applications of discourse analysis principles]. Tiara Wacana.

Nadar, F. X. (2009). Pragmatik dan penelitian pragmatik [Pragmatics and pragmatic research]. Graha Ilmu.

Niu, M. (2023). The origin and development of pragmatics as a study of meaning: Semiotic perspective. Language and Semiotic Studies, 9(1), 54-78. https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2023-0002

Nugroho, A. (2015). Pemahaman kedudukan dan fungsi bahasa Indonesia sebagai dasar jiwa nasionalisme [Understanding the position and function of the Indonesian language as the foundation of nationalism]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bulan Bahasa UNIB2015 (pp. 285-291). Universitas Bengkulu. https://core.ac.uk/reader/35343322

Nuryanto, T. (2015). Menurunnya penutur bahasa Indonesia sebagai lingua franca [The decline of Indonesian language speakers as a Lingua Franca]. Journal Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 1(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v1i1.50

Primantari, A. N., & Wijana, I. D. P. (2016). Perbandingan bentuk tindak tutur meminta oleh pembelajar BIPA dari korea dan penutur asli bahasa Indonesia: Kajian bahasa antara [A comparative study of request speech act forms by Korean BIPA learners and native Indonesian speakers: An interlanguage analysis]. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 1(2), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.23917/kls.v1i2.3629

Purba, A. (2014). Tindak tutur dan peristiwa tutur. Pena: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 1(1), 77-91. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/pena/article/view/1426

Rahardi, K. (2003). Berkenalan dengan ilmu bahasa pragmatik [An introduction to the study of pragmatics]. Dioma.

Rahardi, K. (2005). Pragmatik: Kesantunan imperatif bahasa Indonesia [Pragmatics: Politeness in Indonesian imperative sentences]. Erlangga.

Rahardi, K., Setyaningsih, Y., & Dewi, R. P. (2016). Pragmatik: Fenomena ketidaksantunan berbahasa [Pragmatics: The phenomenon of linguistic impoliteness]. Erlangga.

Rakhmat, M., & Qohar, H. A. (2024). Pengaruh bilingualisme dalam bahasa Indonesia [The influence of bilingualism on the Indonesian language]. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 6(6), 3057-3072. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i3.1596

Ramdhan, M. (2021). Metode penelitian [Research methods]. Cipta Media Nusantara.

Rohmadi, M. (2004). Pragmatik teori dan analisis [Pragmatics: Theory and analysis]. Lingkar Media.

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

Sofyan, A., Badrudin, A., Fitriani, D. N., & Muta’allim. (2022). Types and functions of illocutionary speech acts on intercharacter dialogue in Tilik short films. Lingua, 18(2), 148-156. https://doi.org/10.15294/lingua.v18i2.36163

Sultan, S., Rapi, M., Haris, H., & Saleh, M. (2023). Speech acts in appeals for social distancing and public compliance intentions during the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 802-817. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i3.50574

Suminar, R. P. (2016). Pengaruh bahasa gaul terhadap penggunaan bahasa Indonesia mahasiswa Unswagati [The influence of slang on the use of Indonesian language among Unswagati students]. Jurnal Logika, 18(3), 114-119.

Syafruddin. (2022). Bahasa wiraniaga (Perspektif pragmatik) [Salesperson language (A pragmatic perspective)]. Penerbit Tahta Media Group.

Tafesse, W., & Dayan, M. (2023). Content creators’ participation in the creator economy: Examining the effect of creators’ content sharing frequency on user engagement behavior on digital platforms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, Article 103357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103357

Thanh, N. C., & Thanh, T. T. L. (2015). The interconnection between interpretivist paradigm and qualitative methods in education. American Journal of Educational Science, 1(2), 24-27.

Wiratno, T., & Santosa, R. (2014). Pengantar linguistik umum [Introduction to general linguistics]. Penerbit Universitas Terbuka.

Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik [Pragmatics] (Trans. by Indah Fajar Wahyuni). Pustaka Pelajar.

Yuliarti, Y., Rustono, R., & Nuryatin, A. (2015). Tindak tutur direktif dalam wacana novel trilogi karya Agustinus Wibowo. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(2), 78-85. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/seloka/article/view/9864/6304

Zagoto, M., M., Yarni, N., & Dakhi, O. (2019). Perbedaan individu dari gaya belajarnya serta implikasinya dalam pembelajaran [Individual differences in learning styles and their implications for instruction]. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 2(2), 259-265. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v2i2.481

Ziraluo, M. (2020). Analisis tindak tutur lokusi, ilikusi, dan perlokusi pada debat Capres-Cawapres Republik Indonesia tahun 2019 [Analysis of locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary speech acts in the 2019 Presidential and Vice-Presidential Debate of the Republic of Indonesia]. Jurnal Education And Development, 8(2), 249-256. https://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/1690/837

Zaim, M., (2014). Metode penelitian bahasa: Pendekatan struktural [Language research methods: A structural approach]. FBS UNP Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v20i2.35690



Copyright (c) 2025 LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Member of:

Crossref

Indexed by:

Dimension Google Scolar  Sinta Sinta   Journal TOCS     

Editorial Office:
Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65144
Email: jurnallingua@gmail.com
Phone: (+62) 341 570872


Creative Commons License
LiNGUA by Laboratory of Information and Publication, Faculty of Humanities is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/humbud/index.