Errors In Writing Educational Research For Master's And Doctoral Degrees In The Specialization Of Arabic Language Curriculum And Instruction In Egypt/ الأخطاء في كتابة البحوث التربوية في الماجستير والدكتوراه تخصص المناهج وطرق تدريس اللغة العربية في مصر

Abdulrahman Mohsen Hassan

Abstract


Adhering to scientific methodology and sound scientific writing rules is a fundamental requirement when writing Master's theses and Doctoral dissertations. However, the recurrence of errors often limits the quality and utility of such research. This study focused on educational research within the specialization of Curriculum and Instruction of Arabic Language. It aimed to elevate the standard of such research by identifying common errors, presenting authentic examples, and guiding researchers on how to avoid them. The study employed a descriptive method, utilizing qualitative content analysis supplemented by descriptive statistics to determine error frequencies. It analyzed a comprehensive census of all 30 Master's theses and Doctoral dissertations submitted to the Department of Curriculum and Instruction of Arabic Language at a Faculty of Education in Egypt during the last three years, from 2023 to 2025. Thus, the sample represented the entire research population during that period. For analysis purposes, a content analysis checklist was developed, and its validity and reliability were verified. Results revealed 64 types of methodological and linguistic errors across 20 research elements, including the problem statement, terminology, and language. Prominent errors included formulating a nonresearchable question, citing secondary sources in defining terms, and errors in writing hamzat al-wasl and hamzat al-qat' (Arabic orthography). The study proposed corrective models for these errors. It recommended adding language courses to graduate programs, especially related to academic language, and providing applied training in scientific writing. It also proposed developing a list of scientific research standards based on the identified errors to guide future evaluative studies.

Keywords


Scientific Writing; Educational Research; Common Errors; Curriculum and Instruction; Arabic Language Teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References


ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ, ʿIṣām ʿAṭiyyah. (2015). Al-akhṭāʾ al-shāʾiʿah fī al-khuṭaṭ al-baḥthiyyah bi-Kulliyyat al-Tarbiyah bi-al-ʿArīsh: Dirāsah ḥālah. Majallat Kulliyyat al-Tarbiyah – Jāmiʿat Būr Saʿīd, 18(18), 346–397. https://doi.org/10.21608/jftp.2015.32226

ʿAbd al-Rabb, ʿAbd Allah Ḥasan, al-Hadi, Aḥmad Masʿad, & al-Khulani, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Aḥmad. (2022). Al-akhṭāʾ al-shā’iʿah wa-al-ṣuʿūbāt fī iʿdād al-rasaʾil wa-al-aṭrūḥāt ladā ṭalabat al-dirāsāt al-ʿulyā fī kuliyyāt al-tarbiyah bil-jāmiʿāt al-yamaniyyah. Al-Ādāb li-l-Dirāsāt al-Nafsiyyah wa-al-Tarbawiyyah, 1(16), 43–83. https://doi.org/10.53285/artsep.v1i16.931

ʿAfānah, ʿAzzū Ismāʿīl. (2011). Akhṭāʾ shāʾiʿah fī taṣāmīm al-buḥūth al-tarbawiyyah ladā ṭalabat al-dirāsāt al-ʿulyā fī al-jāmiʿāt al-Filasṭīniyyah. In Aʿmāl Muʾtamar al-Baḥth al-ʿIlmī: Mafāhīmuhu, Akhlāqiyyātuhu, Tawẓīfuhu (pp. 306–336). al-Jāmiʿah al-Islāmiyyah. http://search.mandumah.com/Record/771930

Al-Baṣīṣ, Ḥātim Ḥusayn. (2020). Al-akhṭāʾ al-lughawiyyah al-shāʿiʿah fī buḥūth al-mājistīr wa-al-duktūrāh fī Kulliyyat al-Tarbiyah – Jāmiʿat al-Baʿth. Majallat Jāmiʿat al-Baʿth, 42(9), 53–107.

Al-Baṣīṣ, Ḥātim Ḥusayn. (2021). Dalīl al-akhṭāʾ al-lughawiyyah al-shāʿiʿah fī kitābat al-buḥūth al-ʿilmiyyah. Homs: Kulliyyat al-Tarbiyah, Jāmiʿat al-Baʿth. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11757.10725/1

Al-Dulaimi, Issam Hasan, & Saleh, Ali ʿAbd al-Rahim. (2014). Al-bahth al-ʿilmi: Ususuhu wa-manahijuhu. Amman: Dar al-Ridwan lil-Nashr wa al-Tawziʿ.

Al-Ḥawsaniyyah, ʿAfraʾ ʿAlī, & al-Ghatāmī, Sulaymān Yūsuf. (2021). Al-akhṭāʾ al-manhajiyyah al-shā’iʿah fī al-buḥūth al-ʿilmiyyah (Rasāʾil al-Mājisṭir) al-mujāzah fī takhaṣṣuṣ al-manāhij wa-ṭarāʾiq tadhrīs al-lughah al-ʿArabiyyah bi-Jāmiʿat al-Sulṭān Qābūs. Majallat Ittiḥād al-Jāmiʿāt al-ʿArabiyyah li-l-Buḥūth fī al-Taʿlīm al-ʿĀlī, 41(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.36024/1248-041-001-005

Al-Qaḥṭānī, Muḥammad Ḥasan. (2020). Al-akhṭāʾ al-shā’iʿah fī aṭrūḥāt al-duktūrāh takhaṣṣuṣ al-manāhij wa-ṭurūq al-tadrīs al-ʿāmmah bi-Jāmiʿat al-Malik Khālid fī ḍawʾ taḥlīl muḥtawāhā wa-ārāʾ aʿḍāʾ hayʾat al-tadrīs. Majallat Jāmiʿat al-Malik Khālid lil-ʿUlūm al-Tarbawiyyah, 7(1), 195–222. https://doi.org/10.55534/1320-007-001-009

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

Hassan, Ezzat ʿAbd al-Ḥamid Muḥammad. (2016). Akhṭāʾ al-bāḥithīn wa-al-munāqishīn al-shā’iʿah fī al-buḥūth al-nafsiyyah wa-al-tarbawiyyah. In Aʿmāl Muʾtamar Taqnīyāt al-Tarbiyah wa-al-Taḥaddiyāt al-ʿĀlamiyyah lil-Taʿlīm (pp. 67–85). al-Jamʿiyyah al-ʿArabiyyah li-Taqnīyāt al-Tarbiyah. http://search.mandumah.com/Record/854208

Kojak, Kawthar Ḥusayn. (2007). Akhṭāʾ shā’iʿah fī al-buḥūth al-tarbawiyyah. Cairo: ʿĀlam al-Kutub.

Maʿwaḍ, Naṣr Allāh Muḥammad Maḥmūd, & ʿĪd, Rajāʾ Aḥmad. (2010). Al-baḥth al-tarbawī bayna al-dalālah wa-al-ḍalālah: Dirāsah al-akhṭāʾ al-shāʿiʿah bi-al-baḥth al-tarbawī. In Aʿmāl al-Muʾtamar al-ʿIlmī al-ʿĀshir: Al-Baḥth al-Tarbawī fī al-Waṭan al-ʿArabī – Ruʾā Mustaqbaliyyah (Vol. 1, pp. 63–83). Kulliyyat al-Tarbiyah, Jāmiʿat al-Fayyūm. http://search.mandumah.com/Record/46307




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v9i2.38485

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Abdulrahman Mohsen Hassan

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/