The implementation of metacognitive strategies in students’ teaching practice in microteaching class

Hanna Irma Wahyuni, Paulus Kuswandono

Abstract


A B S T R A C T
Microteaching classes can be a challenging area of negotiation between personal and professional values which can help and provide pre-service teachers understanding and opportunities to hone their teaching and learning process better. This research aims to identify the application of metacognitive strategies in the preparation process for teaching practice in microteaching classes, by focusing on the research questions regarding the implementation of metacognitive strategies in teaching practice exercises and students’s motivation to apply metacognitive strategies in micro-teaching classes. A qualitative case study method was used to answer these two research questions by employing purposive sampling with three participants in a micro-teaching class (semester five). The study reveals that students applied metacognitive strategies of goal-setting, planning, monitoring, and evaluating strategies to enhance their teaching practices. These strategies are influenced by internal and external motivation factors, such as intuition, personal experience, and self-awareness. Nevertheless, as this study involved a small group and did not focus on real classroom practices, future studies are suggested to involve more participants and combine methods to track both the immediate and long-term effects of using metacognitive strategies in teacher training.

Keywords


Metacognition; Micro-teaching; Motivation; Strategies; Teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2009). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Azizah, U., & Nasrudin, H. (2021). Metacognitive skills and self-regulated learning in prospective chemistry teachers: Role of metacognitive skill-based teaching materials. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(3), 461–476.https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.84

Azrai, E.P., Rini, D.S., & Suryanda, A. (2020). Micro-teaching in the digital industrial era 4.0: Necessary or not? Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4A), 23 - 30.https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081804.

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.

Budianto, L., Azmi, M., & Putera, A. A. (2021). The implementation of digital storytelling using discovery learning in EFL listening class: middle school students’ and teachers’ voices. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 11(2), 381-399.

Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Deliany, Z., & Cahyono, B. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of EFL university students across gender. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 421-437.https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17026

Fard, F. (2010). The effect of cognitive and metacognitive strategy-based grammar instruction on intermediate Iranian EFL learners "Development of structural knowledge". In R. Reinelt (ed.), The new decade and (2nd) FL teaching: Initial phase (pp. 31-57). Rudolf Reinelt research laboratory EU Matsuyama Japan.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.

Ivanova, N., & Vinogradova, M.A. (2022). Students’ educational motivation features in the context of distance learning. ARPHA Proceedings, 5, 675-693.https://doi.org/10.3897/ap.5.e0675

Ledger, S., & Fischetti, J. (2020). Micro-teaching 2.0: Technology as the classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 37–54.https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4561

Mitsea, E., & Drigas, A. (2019). A journey into the metacognitive learning strategies. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering, 15(14), 4–20.https://doi.org/10.3991/IJOE.V15I14.11379

Muhid, A., Amalia, E.R., Hilaliyah, H., Budiana, N., & Wajdi, M.B.N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategies implementation on students’ reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 847-862.https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13257a

Nurjanah, L., Wicaksono, B. H., Andini, T. M., & Effendi, M. I. (2023). Evaluation of teacher professional development program: A review of pre-service English teacher professionalism. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JETLE), 5(1), 20-27.

Rahayu, P., & Siregar, S.D. (2018). Teaching strategies in students’ micro teaching performance. Altar Conference: Post Graduate of English Department, 2(1), 202-211.

Ramadhanti, D., & Yanda, D. P. (2021). Students’ metacognitive awareness and its impact on writing skill. International Journal of Language Education, 5(3), 193-206.https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i3.18978

Reddy, K. R. (2019). Teaching how to teach: Microteaching (a way to build up teaching skills). Journal of Gandaki Medical College-Nepal, 12(1), 65-71.http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jgmcn.v12i1.22621

Schraw, G., & Bain, J. D. (2004). Teaching for metacognitive knowledge and skills. In D. H. Schunk (Ed.), Self-regulated learning: Conception and instructional implications for students with learning disabilities (pp. 131-154). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Taufik, A. R., Suryani, D. R., & Nurhayati, N. (2022). Analisis metakognisi siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gaya kognitif reflektif dan impulsif. Science Map Journal, 4(1), 40–48.https://doi.org/10.30598/jmsvol4issue1pp40-48

Thangaraju, P., & Medhi, B. (2023). Microteaching: Overview and examination evaluation. Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 55(4), 257-262. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_912_21

Van Loon, M. H., Bayard, N. S., Steiner, M., & Roebers, C. M. (2021). Connecting teachers’ classroom instructions with children’s metacognition and learning in elementary school. Metacognition and learning, 16, 623-650.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09248-2

Wang, J., Tigelaar, D. E., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Rural teachers’ sharing of digital educational resources: From motivation to behavior. Computers & Education, 161, 104055.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104055

Zulfikar, T., Nidawati, N., Khasinah, S., & Mayangsari, I. (2020). Indonesian students’ perceived benefits of the micro-teaching course to their teaching internship. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 242–250.https://doi.org/10.17509/IJAL.V10I1.25063




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/jetle.v5i2.26444

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JETLE)
Mailing Address
English Education Department
Faculty of Education and Teacher Training
Universitas Islam Negeri UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang 65144, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Telp/Fax: +62341-552398    Email: jetle@uin-malang.ac.id  
 
 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Indexed by