Syntactic agreement in authentic audio-visual input: Implications for ELT grammar instruction from an Indonesian EFL film

Dinar Dipta, Zeny Luthvia, Eta Lica Hanan Nadifa, Norhayati binti Haji Abd Karim

Abstract


Syntactical agreement is a pivotal grammatical relation that ensures coherence between elements in a clause, particularly in terms of number, gender, and person. Failing to master it results in grammatical errors that undermine communication. Focusing on the Inthiq! 2-Speak English! film by Gontor TV, the research aims to identify the types of agreement employed by the characters and their appropriateness across different agreement structures. Employing a qualitative content analysis design, data were collected from the film’s transcription and analyzed using established grammatical frameworks and relevant previous studies. The findings reveal two major agreement types: subject-verb agreement (55 occurrences) and pronoun-antecedent agreement (10 occurrences). Through a systematic analysis of these patterns, the researcher examines how accurately and consistently agreement forms are used in authentic dialogue and interprets how these naturally occurring examples can be transformed into pedagogical materials. The study highlights its relevance to EFL instruction by demonstrating that authentic media, particularly locally produced films, can serve as effective resources for teaching grammatical agreement, enhancing learners’ syntactic awareness, and illustrating real-life language use. The findings suggest that agreement patterns are predominantly simple and consistent, reflecting simplified spoken input rather than full natural complexity. Overall, the results provide both linguistic insights and practical implications for integrating audio-visual materials into EFL teaching.

Keywords


authentic materials; EFL pedagogical implications; Inthiq! 2 discourse; syntactical agreement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baker, M. C. (2008). The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge University Press.

Bureković, M., Perenda, Š., & Rizvić-Eminović, E. (2025). Subject-Verb Concord Proficiency Among EFL Bosnian Students. European Journal of Education Studies, 12(1), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i1.5804

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. The MIT Press.

Corbett, G. G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge University Press.

Corbett, G. G. (2022). The Agreement Hierarchy Revisited: The Typology of Controllers. Word Structure, 15(3), 181–225. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2022.0208

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th edition (international student edition)). SAGE Publications.

Dinamika, S. G., & Hanafiah, R. (2019). Syntactical Error Analysis on Report Text. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature), 4(2), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v4i2.7681

Gumbaridze, Z., & Popkhadze, T. (2025). Interpretation Challenges of English Analytical Terms for EFL Learners: A Linguistic Study of Semantic Transparency and Contextual Cues. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 4(48), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4025

Haig, G., & Forker, D. (2018). Agreement in Grammar and Discourse: A Research Overview. Linguistics, 56(4), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0014

Handayani, N. D., & Wardana, I. K. (2025). Assessing the Effectiveness of Interactive Grammar-Based Teaching in Enhancing EFL Learners’ Concord Comprehension and Learning Confidence. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 15(1), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v15i1.9345

Harley, H., & Ritter, E. (2002). Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis. Language, 78(3), 482–526. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2002.0158

Haspelmath, M. (2018). How Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Linguistic Categories Are Different. In D. Olmen, T. Mortelmans, & F. Brisard (Eds), Aspects of Linguistic Variation (pp. 83–114). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110607963-004

Hassanzadeh, M., & Shahbazi, F. (2021). Explicit Instruction of English Articles: An Appraisal of Consciousness-Raising Instruction and Processing Instruction Frameworks. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 18(4), 1211–1233. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.4.9.1211

Hofherr, P. C. (2020). Agreement Morphology. In P. C. Hofherr, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.500

Hossain, K. I. (2024). Literature-Based Language Learning: Challenges, and Opportunities for English Learners. Ampersand, 13, 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2024.100201

Humas. (2023, January 21). Rilis Film “Inthiq! 2”, Gontor Berikan Edukasi akan Pentingnya Belajar Bahasa Inggris. https://gontor.ac.id/rilis-film-inthiq-2-gontor-berikan-edukasi-akan-pentignya-belajar-bahasa-inggris/

Istifadah, I., & Badriyah, I. M. (2024). The effectiveness of the use “basic english grammar e-module” as an autonomous learning media toward students’ English grammar course achievementsMastering. Annual International Conference on Islamic Education for Students, 2(1), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.18326/aicoies.v2i1.616

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

Kusumawati, A. (2025). Indonesian and English Sentence Patterns: A Contrastive Syntactic Perspective. Linguistics Initiative, 5(2), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.52341

Li, S., & Akram, H. (2024). Navigating Pronoun-Antecedent Challenges: A Study of ESL Academic Writing Errors. Sage Open, 14(4), 21582440241296607. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241296607

López, J. E. L., López, J. S. C., & Tenesaca, J. R. B. (2025). English Movies as Audiovisual Resources to Improve Speaking Skills. Street Art & Urban Creativity, 11(6), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.62161/sauc.v11.5847

Moges, E. W., Chine, Dr. B. S., & Adugna, Dr. E. T. (2025). Assessing Syntactic Complexity Indices as Predictors of EFL Argumentative Essay Writing Quality: A Focus on First-Year University Students. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 22(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2025.22.1.4.65

Pabillo, J. N., & Cadiao, E. C. H. (2023). Error Analysis on Subject—Verb Agreement in the Cambridge Checkpoint Writing Exam of Indonesian Secondary 2 Students. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(5), 2060–2078. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.8002449

Pollard, C. J., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press.

Rahayu, F. E. S., Utomo, A., & Setyowati, R. (2021). Syntactic and Lexical Complexity of Undergraduate Students’ Essays: A Comparison Study between L1 and L2 Writings. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 5(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v5i2.706

Saber, A., Cartron, A., Kloppmann-Lambert, C., & Louis, C. (2020). Towards a Typology of Linguistic and Stylistic Errors in Scientific Abstracts Written by Low-Proficiency Geoscience and Mechanical Engineering Doctoral Students in France. Fachsprache, 42(3–4), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.24989/fs.v42i3-4.1839

Sahiruddin. (2022). Textual Syntactic Complexity and Its Role In Second Language Reading Outcomes In Indonesia. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 6(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v6i2.1268

Seriki, J. E., & Chahur, A. A. (2023). The Use of Pronoun-Antecedent Agreement in Social Media Communication Among Nigerian Speakers of English. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(8), 1189–1203. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7893

Siemund, P. (2016). The Mutual Relevance of Typology and Variation Studies. Linguistic Typology, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0024

Su, H., & Lu, X. (2022). Assessing Pragmatic Performance in Advanced L2 Academic Writing Through the Lens of Local Grammars: A Case Study of ‘Exemplification’. Assessing Writing, 54, 100668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100668

Webster, K., Recasens, M., Axelrod, V., & Baldridge, J. (2018). Mind the GAP: A Balanced Corpus of Gendered Ambiguous Pronouns. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6, 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00240




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/jetle.v7i2.41710

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JETLE)
Mailing Address
English Education Department
Faculty of Education and Teacher Training
Universitas Islam Negeri UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Jalan Gajayana 50 Malang 65144, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Telp/Fax: +62341-552398    Email: jetle@uin-malang.ac.id  
 
 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Indexed by

       

DOAJ - DIAMAS