Dynamic Analysis of a Predator–Prey Model with Group Defense in Prey and Cooperative Hunting in Predators

Nabilah Meladelvia, Dian Savitri

Abstract


This article discusses a single-prey and single-predator model by incorporating two behavioral mechanisms, namely group defense in prey modeled through a Holling type IV response function and cooperative hunting in predators represented by a predation rate dependent on predator density. Through system analysis, up to four equilibrium points are obtained mathematically. Among these, three equilibria are biologically feasible under typical parameter values, corresponding to total extinction, predator extinction, and coexistence states. The total extinction equilibrium is always unstable, while the stability of the predator extinction and coexistence equilibria depends on the predator attack rate. Numerical simulations in the form of phase portraits were obtained by varying the parameters related to the predator attack rate. The simulation results show various dynamic behaviors, including predator extinction, asymptotically stable coexistence between prey and predators, and bistability. Numerical continuation analysis identifies a subcritical Hopf bifurcation at α=0.4595, confirmed by a positive first Lyapunov coefficient, as well as a saddle-node at α= 0.0478 and transcritical bifurcations α=3.0505 that alter equilibrium structure and stability. These findings demonstrate how prey group defense and predator cooperation can generate bistability and abrupt transitions between extinction and coexistence, accompanied by damped oscillatory dynamics near critical parameter values.

Keywords


Cooperative Hunting; Dynamic Analysis; Group Defense; Holling type IV; Local Stability.

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] S. Sumarto and R. Koneri. Ekologi Hewan. 2016.

[2] D. Kikuchi et al. “The evolution and ecology of multiple antipredator defences”. In: Journal of Evolutionary Biology 36.7 (2023), pp. 975–991. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14192.

[3] J. Johnson and M. Belk. “Predators as Agents of Selection and Diversification”. In: Diversity 12.11 (2020), p. 415. doi: 10.3390/d12110415.

[4] S. Pal, N. Pal, S. Samanta, and J. Chattopadhyay. “Effect of hunting cooperation and fear in a predator-prey model”. In: Ecological Complexity 39 (2019), p. 100770. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2019.100770.

[5] S. Loarie, C. Tambling, and G. Asner. “Lion hunting behaviour and vegetation structure in an African savanna”. In: Animal Behaviour 85.5 (2013), pp. 899–906. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.01.018.

[6] S. Yiu, N. Owen-Smith, and J. Cain. “How lions move at night when they hunt?” In: Journal of Mammalogy 103.4 (2022), pp. 855–864. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyac025.

[7] N. Courbin, A. Loveridge, H. Fritz, D. Macdonald, R. Patin, M. Valeix, and S. Chamaillé-Jammes. “Zebra diel migrations reduce encounter risk with lions at night”. In: Journal of Animal Ecology 88.1 (2019), pp. 92–101. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12910.

[8] Resmawan, A. Suryanto, I. Darti, and Panigoro H. “Dynamical Analysis of a Predator-Prey Model with Additif Allee Effect and Prey Group Defense”. In: 12.11 (2024), p. 415. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/9ufkn.

[9] R. Pratama, M. Loupatty, W. Hariyanto H.and Caesarendra, and W. Rahmaniar. “Fear and Group Defense Effect of a Holling Type IV Predator-Prey System Intraspecific Competition”. In: Emerging Science Journal 7.2 (2023), pp. 385–395. doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-02-06.

[10] H. Chen, M. Liu, and X. Xu. “Dynamics of a Prey–Predator Model with Group Defense for Prey, Cooperative Hunting for Predator, and Lévy Jump”. In: Axioms 12.9 (2023), p. 878. doi: 10.3390/axioms12090878.

[11] S. Salwa, L. Shakira, and D. Savitri. “Dinamika Model Mangsa-Pemangsa Lotka Volterra Dengan Adanya Kerja Sama Berburu Pada Pemangsa”. In: Jurnal Riset dan Aplikasi Matematika (JRAM) 7.2 (2023), pp. 195–205. doi: 10.26740/jram.v7n2.p195-205.

[12] D. Bai and J. Tang. “Global Dynamics of a Predator–Prey System with Cooperative Hunting”. In: Applied Sciences 13.14 (2023), p. 8178. doi: 10.3390/app13148178.

[13] Y. Du, B. Niu, and Wei. J. “A predator-prey model with cooperative hunting in the predator and group defense in the prey”. In: Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems-Series B 27.10 (2022). doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021298.

[14] M. Alves and F. Hilker. “Hunting cooperation and Allee effects in predators”. In: Journal of theoretical biology 419 (2017), pp. 13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.02.002.

[15] K. Tsutsui, R. Tanaka, K. Takeda, and K. Fujii. “Collaborative hunting in artificial agents with deep reinforcement learning”. In: Elife 13 (2024), e85694. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85694.

[16] Y. Xu, J. Zhao, and X. Wei. “Spatiotemporal dynamics in a delayed diffusive predator-prey model with cooperative hunting and group defense”. In: Advances in Continuous and Discrete Models 2025.1 (2025), p. 113. doi: 10.1186/s13662-025-03971-3.

[17] M. Chen and W. Yang. “Role of Cooperative Hunting among Predators and Predator-Dependent Prey Refuge Behavior in a Predator-Prey Model”. In: Journal of Nonlinear Modeling and Analysis 7.1 (2025), pp. 209–228. doi: 10.12150/jnma.2025.209.

[18] M. Singh, A. Sharma, and L. Sánchez-Ruiz. “Impact of the Allee Effect on the Dynamics of a Predator-Prey Model Exhibiting Group Defense”. In: Mathematics 13.4 (2025), p. 633. doi: 10.3390/math13040633.

[19] H. Zhang. “Dynamics Behavior of a Predator-Prey Diffusion Model Incorporating Hunting Cooperation and Predator-Taxis”. In: Mathematics 12.10 (2024), p. 1474. doi: 10.3390/math12101474.

[20] Y. Zhang, L. Chen, F. Chen, and Z. Li. “Interplay between preys’ anti-predator behavior and predators’ cooperative hunting: A mathematical approach”. In: Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 199 (2025), p. 116624. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116624.

[21] I. Benamara and A. El Abdllaoui. “Bifurcation in a delayed predator–prey model with Holling type IV functional response incorporating hunting cooperation and fear effect”. In: International Journal of Dynamics and Control 11.6 (2023), pp. 2733–2750. doi: 10.1007/s40435-023-01123-7.

[22] D. Fitri and D. Savitri. “Prey predator Model with Holling Type II Functional Response and Hunting Cooperation of Predators”. In: MATHunesa: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika 12.3 (2024), pp. 637–645. doi: 10.26740/mathunesa.v12n3.p637-645.

[23] A. Salsabila and D. Savitri. “Dynamical Analysis of Holling Tanner Prey Predators Model with Add Food in Second Level Predators”. In: Jambura Journal of Biomathematics (JJBM) 5.2 (2024), pp. 63–70. doi: 10.37905/jjbm.v5i2.25753.

[24] Z. Ju, Y. Shao, X. Xie, X. Ma, and X. Fang. “The Dynamics of an Impulsive Predator-Prey System with Stage Structure and Holling Type III Functional Response”. In: Journal of Animal Ecology 2015.1 (2015). doi: 10.1155/2015/183526.

[25] A. Mufidah and D. Savitri. “Analisis kestabilan model mangsa pemangsa dengan makanan tambahan pada pemangsa menggunakan fungsi respon holling tipe iv”. In: Jurnal Riset dan Aplikasi Matematika (JRAM) 7.1 (2023), pp. 80–94. doi: 10.26740/jram.v7n1.p80-94.

[26] D. Das, D. Banerjee, and J. Bhattacharjee. “Super-Critical and Sub-Critical Hopf bifurcations in two and three dimensions”. In: Nonlinear Dynamics 77.1 (2014), pp. 169–184. doi: 10.1007/s11071-014-1282-8.

[27] D. Savitri and H. Panigoro. “Bifurkasi Hopf pada model prey-predator-super predator dengan fungsi respon yang berbeda”. In: Jambura Journal of Biomathematics (JJBM) 1.2 (2020), pp. 65–70. doi: 10.34312/jjbm.v1i2.8399.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v11i1.40210

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Dian Savitri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office
Mathematics Department,
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144
Faximile (+62) 341 558933
e-mail: cauchy@uin-malang.ac.id

Creative Commons License
CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.