Dynamics of Predator-Prey Model with Holling Type II Involving Predator Stage-Structured and Cannibalism

Sela Tri Indah Sari, Dian Savitri

Abstract


Predator–prey models with nonlinear functional responses provide a robust framework for understanding population regulation and oscillatory dynamics. This study analyzes a three-dimensional predator–prey model incorporating Holling type II functional responses, explicit predator stage structure, and cannibalism. The primary objective is to investigate how adult predation, maturation, and cannibalism parameters influence equilibrium stability and the emergence of oscillations through Hopf bifurcation. Analytical results establish the existence and local stability of a positive coexistence equilibrium. For a biologically relevant parameter set, numerical simulations demonstrate that trajectories converge to the coexistence equilibrium (59.9078, 23.9092, 56.0552). This state is locally asymptotically stable, as the real parts of all Jacobian eigenvalues are negative. Numerical continuation methods are employed to detect Hopf bifurcations induced by key parameters. Two Hopf points are identified for the adult predation rate at 0.4211 and 8.7725, while the maturation rate induces bifurcations at 0.2661 and 0.5271. Additionally, the cannibalism parameter triggers a Hopf bifurcation at 0.1835, initiating periodic population oscillations. These results demonstrate that maturation and cannibalism define distinct instability thresholds, jointly governing the transition from stable coexistence to sustained oscillatory dynamics in stage-structured systems


Keywords


Cannibalism; Dynamical Analysis; Holling Type II; Hopf Bifurcation; Stage- Structured

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] Lotka, A. J. (1956). Elements of Mathematical Biology. New York: Dover Publications.

[2] Volterra, V. (1926). Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature, 118(2972), 558–560.

[3] Holling, C. S. (1959). Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. The Canadian Entomologist, 91(7), 385–398. doi:10.4039/Ent91385-7

[4] Wang, S., Yu, H., Dai, C., & Zhao, M. (2020). The dynamical behavior of a predator–prey system with Holling type II functional response and Allee effect. Applied Mathematics, 11(5), 1–19. doi:10.4236/am.2020.115029

[5] Beay, L. K., Suryanto, A., Darti, I., & Trisilowati. (2020). Hopf bifurcation and stability analysis of the Rosenzweig–MacArthur predator–prey model with stage-structure in prey. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 17(4), 4080–4097. doi:10.3934/mbe.2020226

[6] Helali, S., Laribi, D., & Fredj, H. B. (2025). Two-prey predator model with Holling type-II functional response and multiple delays: Hopf bifurcation analysis, parameter estimation and capture prediction. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, 71, 7691–7724. doi:10.1007/s12190-025-02544-7

[7] Dai, X., Jiao, H., Jiao, J., & Quan, Q. (2023). Survival analysis of a predator–prey model with seasonal migration of prey populations between breeding and non-breeding regions. Mathematics, 11(18). doi:10.3390/math11183838

[8] Diz-Pita, É. (2024). Global dynamics of a predator-prey system with immigration in both species. Electronic Research Archive, 32(2), 762–778. doi:10.3934/era.2024036

[9] Azizah, F. N., Alivia, A. R., Haz, H. R. S., & Sukkur, U. Y. (2024). The effect of refugia on prey–predator model with parasite infection. International Journal of Applied Mathematics, Sciences, and Technology for National Defense, 2(2). doi:10.58524/app.sci.def.v2i2.423

[10] Yang, J., Zhao, Z., Kong, Y., & Xu, J. (2025). Spatiotemporal dynamics of a predator–prey model with harvest and disease in prey. Mathematics, 13(15). doi:10.3390/math13152474

[11] Almuallem, N. A., Mollah, H., & Sarwardi, S. (2025). A study of a prey–predator model with disease in predator including gestation delay, treatment and linear harvesting of predator species. AIMS Mathematics, 10(6), 14657–14698. doi:10.3934/math.2025660

[12] Duan, D., Niu, B., Wei, J., & Yuan, Y. (2024). The dynamical analysis of a nonlocal predator–prey model with cannibalism. European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 35(5), 707–731. doi:10.1017/S0956792524000019

[13] Polis, G. A. (1981). The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 12, 225–251. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001301

[14] Lin, Q., Liu, C., Xie, X., & Xue, Y. (2020). Global attractivity of Leslie–Gower predator–prey model incorporating prey cannibalism. Advances in Continuous and Discrete Models, 2020. doi:10.1186/s13662-020-02609-w

[15] Mishra, P., Raw, S., & Tiwari, B. (2021). On a cannibalistic predator–prey model with prey defense and diffusion. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 90, 165–190. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.060

[16] Fernández, F. J., Gámez, M., Garay, J., & Cabello, T. (2020). Do development and diet determine the degree of cannibalism in insects? To eat or not to eat conspecifics. Insects, 11(4), 242. doi:10.3390/insects11040242

[17] Wildy, E. L., & Whiles, M. R. (2021). Cannibalism and intraguild predation among larval amphibians under natural conditions. Ecology, 102(5), e03320. doi:10.1002/ecy.3320

[18] Sepúlveda-Quiroz, C. A., Pérez-Jiménez, G. M., Asencio-Alcudia, G. G., & Marín, E. S. P. (2024). Tryptophan reduces intracohort cannibalism behavior in tropical gar (Atractosteus tropicus) larvae. Fishes, 9(1), 40. doi:10.3390/fishes9010040

[19] Ebensperger, L. A., Hayes, L. D., & Ramírez-Estrada, J. (2020). Sex-specific variation in filial cannibalism among mammals. Biological Reviews, 95(6), 1559–1575. doi:10.1111/brv.12640

[20] Matos, C. S., Silva, R. S., & Oliveira, D. M. (2025). First record of cannibalism in the red-finger rubble crab Eriphia gonagra in a natural environment. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 45(1), ruae005. doi:10.1093/jcbiol/ruae005

[21] Fox, L. R. (1975). Cannibalism in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 6, 87–106. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.000511

[22] Elgar, M. A., & Crespi, B. J. (1992). Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution Among Diverse Taxa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[23] Li, J., & Zhu, Z. (2020). Impact of cannibalism on dynamics of a structured predator–prey system. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 78, 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2019.09.022

[24] Wei, Y. (2022). Stability analysis of a stage-structure predator–prey system with time delay. Axioms, 11(8), 421. doi:10.3390/axioms11080421

[25] Li, X. (2021). Global analysis of a juvenile–adult model for cannibalistic interactions. International Journal of Biomathematics, 14(1), 2150045. doi:10.1142/S1793524521500455

[26] Zhang, F., Chen, Y., & Li, J. (2019). Dynamical analysis of a stage-structured predator–prey model with cannibalism. Mathematical Biosciences, 307, 33–41. doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2018.11.004

[27] Rayungsari, M., Suryanto, A., Kusumawinahyu, W. M., & Darti, I. (2022). Dynamical analysis of a predator–prey model incorporating predator cannibalism and refuge. Axioms, 11(3), 116. doi:10.3390/axioms11030116

[28] Zheng, T., Zhang, L., Luo, Y., Zhou, X., Li, H.-L., & Teng, Z. (2021). Stability and Hopf bifurcation of a stage-structured cannibalism model with two delays. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 31(12), 2150242. doi:10.1142/S0218127421502424

[29] Dinnullah, R. (2018). A discrete-time predator–prey model with Holling type II functional response. CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi, 5(2), 65–72. doi:10.18860/ca.v5i2.4716

[30] Luis, P., Kamalia, P. Z., Peter, O. J., & Aldila, D. (2025). Implementation of non-standard finite difference on a predator–prey model considering cannibalism on predator and harvesting on prey. Jambura Journal of Biomathematics, 6(1), 35–43. doi:10.37905/jjbm.v6i1.30550

[31] Ikbal, M. (2025). Analisis kestabilan model dua mangsa–satu pemangsa dengan pemanenan pada mangsa. MATHunesa: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, 13(3), 388–394. doi:10.26740/mathunesa.v13n3.p388-394

[32] Alani, A. A., & Naji, R. K. (2025). The role of prey vigilance, cannibalism, and hunting cooperation on prey–predator dynamics. Communications in Mathematical Biology and Neuroscience, 2025, Article ID 112. doi:10.28919/cmbn/9513

[33] Abdulghafour, A. S., & Naji, R. K. (2022). Modeling and analysis of a prey–predator system incorporating fear, predator-dependent refuge, and cannibalism. Communications in Mathematical Biology and Neuroscience, Article ID 106. doi:10.28919/cmbn/7722

[34] Savitri, D., & Panigoro, H. S. (2020). Bifurkasi Hopf pada model prey–predator–super predator dengan fungsi respon yang berbeda. Jambura Journal of Biomathematics, 1(2), 65–72. doi:10.34312/jjbm.v1i2.8399




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v11i1.41044

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Dian Savitri, Sela Tri Indah Sari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office
Mathematics Department,
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Gajayana Street 50 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144
Faximile (+62) 341 558933
e-mail: cauchy@uin-malang.ac.id

Creative Commons License
CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.